Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for New Mexico by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
De Baca County Rural No 265.9 (145.6, 459.9) 1 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Sierra County Rural No 203.9 (164.9, 252.2) 2 (1, 21) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Union County Rural No 192.3 (125.9, 284.3) 3 (1, 32) 5
*
*
Eddy County Rural No 191.6 (169.9, 215.3) 4 (1, 15) 60 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 6.0)
McKinley County Rural No 182.1 (159.6, 206.8) 5 (1, 21) 52 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.2)
Curry County Rural No 178.2 (153.3, 205.8) 6 (1, 25) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Lea County Rural No 174.2 (153.1, 197.2) 7 (2, 24) 54 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
Quay County Rural No 174.0 (131.6, 228.3) 8 (1, 31) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.2, -0.5)
Grant County Rural No 172.4 (148.6, 199.7) 9 (2, 26) 44 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Otero County Rural No 170.7 (152.8, 190.2) 10 (3, 24) 69 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Hidalgo County Rural No 167.1 (109.7, 249.3) 11 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Valencia County Urban No 163.7 (147.5, 181.3) 12 (4, 26) 79 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Socorro County Rural No 162.8 (130.7, 201.2) 13 (2, 31) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.2, 0.0)
Luna County Rural No 162.5 (136.5, 192.5) 14 (2, 30) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Chaves County Rural No 157.1 (139.1, 176.8) 15 (5, 29) 57 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Cibola County Rural No 156.7 (129.3, 188.3) 16 (3, 32) 24 rising rising trend 13.5 (0.4, 24.1)
Roosevelt County Rural No 153.4 (120.4, 192.9) 17 (2, 32) 15 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.4)
Torrance County Urban No 153.2 (122.6, 190.2) 18 (2, 32) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.1)
Bernalillo County Urban No 153.0 (147.3, 158.8) 19 (11, 25) 589 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Dona Ana County Urban No 152.2 (142.4, 162.6) 20 (10, 27) 185 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Rio Arriba County Rural No 152.1 (131.6, 175.2) 21 (5, 31) 42 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
San Juan County Urban No 150.5 (137.1, 165.0) 22 (9, 29) 99 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Sandoval County Urban No 148.3 (136.9, 160.4) 23 (11, 29) 137 stable stable trend -1.1 (-1.8, 1.0)
Mora County Rural No 139.3 (94.2, 209.1) 24 (2, 32) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.1)
Guadalupe County Rural No 138.6 (89.4, 209.7) 25 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.9, 3.0)
Lincoln County Rural No 137.6 (114.5, 165.5) 26 (8, 32) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.5)
Los Alamos County Rural No 136.3 (108.0, 170.1) 27 (6, 32) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.0)
Colfax County Rural No 135.6 (105.9, 173.2) 28 (6, 32) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.6)
Taos County Rural No 134.8 (116.1, 156.5) 29 (12, 32) 42 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.8)
San Miguel County Rural No 132.5 (110.0, 158.7) 30 (10, 32) 27 falling falling trend -3.3 (-24.3, -0.2)
Catron County Rural No 130.1 (77.0, 223.1) 31 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.1, 1.4)
Santa Fe County Urban No 124.5 (115.3, 134.4) 32 (24, 32) 152 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -1.5)
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 1:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top