Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Missouri by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Adair County Rural No 211.2 (176.9, 250.5) 54 (6, 112) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Andrew County Urban No 198.4 (163.3, 239.4) 76 (13, 114) 24 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.2)
Atchison County Rural No 276.4 (209.0, 363.2) 8 (1, 106) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
Audrain County Rural No 245.8 (205.6, 291.5) 18 (2, 97) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Barry County Rural No 221.5 (195.5, 250.3) 42 (10, 94) 57 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Barton County Rural No 185.4 (144.3, 235.6) 91 (13, 115) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Bates County Urban No 173.2 (138.3, 214.8) 104 (27, 115) 18 falling falling trend -19.8 (-30.7, -8.7)
Benton County Rural No 200.4 (172.3, 233.2) 73 (19, 112) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Bollinger County Urban No 221.3 (175.4, 276.9) 43 (2, 114) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Boone County Urban No 180.9 (167.6, 195.1) 96 (59, 110) 145 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Buchanan County Urban No 204.4 (186.1, 224.1) 66 (27, 98) 96 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Butler County Rural No 235.5 (209.7, 263.8) 25 (7, 74) 63 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Caldwell County Urban No 220.5 (168.0, 285.1) 44 (1, 114) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Callaway County Urban No 177.3 (155.2, 201.9) 97 (48, 114) 49 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Camden County Rural No 185.4 (165.7, 207.3) 92 (44, 112) 77 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Cape Girardeau County Urban No 184.3 (166.7, 203.3) 93 (49, 112) 84 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Carroll County Rural No 166.7 (124.8, 220.5) 108 (21, 115) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.8)
Carter County Rural No 306.0 (226.2, 407.1) 1 (1, 101) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.1)
Cass County Urban No 186.8 (171.8, 202.8) 89 (51, 108) 120 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Cedar County Rural No 175.6 (141.3, 216.8) 100 (23, 115) 19 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.8)
Chariton County Rural No 236.3 (183.6, 302.1) 24 (1, 112) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Christian County Urban No 187.5 (170.2, 206.1) 87 (45, 111) 92 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Clark County Rural No 176.9 (126.5, 242.7) 99 (10, 115) 8 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.4)
Clay County Urban No 173.2 (162.7, 184.1) 105 (76, 113) 221 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Clinton County Urban No 185.8 (155.5, 220.8) 90 (24, 115) 27 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Cole County Urban No 168.3 (151.2, 187.0) 107 (69, 114) 75 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Cooper County Urban No 194.5 (157.7, 237.8) 80 (15, 115) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.9)
Crawford County Rural No 229.9 (196.2, 268.2) 32 (5, 100) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Dade County Rural No 205.2 (156.9, 266.4) 64 (4, 115) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Dallas County Urban No 259.0 (217.7, 306.4) 14 (1, 84) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Daviess County Rural No 188.8 (140.1, 250.3) 86 (8, 115) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.7)
DeKalb County Urban No 221.8 (176.2, 276.4) 41 (3, 114) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 3.1)
Dent County Rural No 247.5 (206.1, 295.8) 17 (1, 94) 27 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Douglas County Rural No 193.7 (155.9, 239.5) 82 (12, 115) 19 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.4)
Dunklin County Rural No 278.6 (242.2, 319.2) 7 (1, 47) 44 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 2.5)
Franklin County Urban No 205.4 (189.4, 222.4) 63 (31, 96) 133 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Gasconade County Rural No 181.9 (147.8, 222.6) 95 (23, 115) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Gentry County Rural No 259.0 (191.9, 343.8) 13 (1, 113) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.7, 3.9)
Greene County Urban No 183.9 (174.5, 193.7) 94 (66, 106) 297 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Grundy County Rural No 193.6 (149.3, 248.3) 83 (7, 115) 13 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.1)
Harrison County Rural No 220.1 (169.6, 283.0) 45 (2, 114) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 6.8)
Henry County Rural No 208.7 (178.8, 243.1) 57 (13, 109) 36 stable stable trend 3.3 (-3.5, 10.5)
Hickory County Rural No 242.0 (190.5, 306.4) 19 (1, 109) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.7)
Holt County Rural No 156.6 (102.0, 236.0) 113 (10, 115) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.1)
Howard County Urban No 189.7 (143.5, 247.0) 85 (10, 115) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.3)
Howell County Rural No 238.2 (211.6, 267.5) 22 (5, 77) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Iron County Rural No 233.8 (184.7, 293.6) 28 (1, 112) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.6)
Jackson County Urban No 187.1 (180.7, 193.7) 88 (68, 99) 686 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -1.7)
Jasper County Urban No 212.9 (197.0, 229.8) 53 (23, 85) 139 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 205.7 (193.9, 218.1) 61 (34, 87) 260 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Johnson County Rural No 218.1 (192.5, 246.0) 47 (12, 98) 55 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Knox County Rural No 267.3 (182.8, 381.0) 11 (1, 114) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.6)
Laclede County Rural No 214.3 (187.1, 244.6) 52 (13, 105) 47 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Lafayette County Urban No 199.2 (172.7, 228.9) 75 (23, 111) 42 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.8, 8.3)
Lawrence County Rural No 221.9 (195.8, 250.6) 40 (9, 95) 54 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.7, 10.9)
Lewis County Rural No 224.8 (172.3, 288.9) 37 (1, 113) 13 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.4)
Lincoln County Urban No 193.7 (171.5, 218.0) 81 (30, 111) 61 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Linn County Rural No 222.5 (178.5, 275.3) 39 (4, 112) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.4)
Livingston County Rural No 217.9 (175.8, 267.8) 48 (5, 112) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Macon County Rural No 207.0 (169.6, 251.1) 58 (9, 113) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Madison County Rural No 202.6 (161.8, 251.4) 70 (8, 115) 17 falling falling trend -3.8 (-14.3, -1.5)
Maries County Rural No 219.1 (169.7, 280.4) 46 (2, 114) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.3)
Marion County Rural No 228.1 (196.4, 263.8) 34 (6, 98) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
McDonald County Rural No 231.7 (194.0, 274.7) 30 (3, 102) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Mercer County Rural No 232.5 (156.2, 338.6) 29 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.9)
Miller County Rural No 222.5 (191.3, 257.9) 38 (8, 104) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Mississippi County Rural No 239.8 (190.3, 298.7) 21 (1, 109) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Moniteau County Urban No 209.5 (168.3, 257.9) 56 (5, 113) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.7)
Monroe County Rural No 200.7 (153.3, 260.0) 72 (5, 115) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Montgomery County Rural No 267.3 (216.6, 327.3) 10 (1, 91) 20 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.1)
Morgan County Rural No 216.2 (185.7, 251.0) 51 (9, 105) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
New Madrid County Rural No 286.1 (240.0, 339.1) 5 (1, 60) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Newton County Urban No 206.6 (185.9, 229.1) 60 (23, 100) 77 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Nodaway County Rural No 151.8 (122.3, 186.7) 114 (59, 115) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Oregon County Rural No 279.2 (222.1, 348.4) 6 (1, 82) 18 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Osage County Urban No 204.5 (161.2, 256.4) 65 (6, 114) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Ozark County Rural No 227.9 (181.6, 285.5) 35 (2, 112) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Pemiscot County Rural No 231.6 (188.0, 282.9) 31 (2, 110) 21 stable stable trend -8.1 (-28.0, 0.2)
Perry County Rural No 193.1 (160.0, 231.6) 84 (14, 114) 25 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Pettis County Rural No 216.6 (191.2, 244.5) 50 (14, 98) 55 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Phelps County Rural No 175.1 (153.0, 199.7) 101 (49, 114) 47 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Pike County Rural No 196.7 (160.6, 238.7) 78 (12, 114) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Platte County Urban No 165.2 (149.9, 181.7) 110 (75, 115) 93 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Polk County Urban No 166.2 (141.0, 194.8) 109 (50, 115) 32 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Pulaski County Rural No 199.3 (170.7, 231.2) 74 (17, 112) 38 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Putnam County Rural No 237.1 (171.1, 324.3) 23 (1, 114) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Ralls County Rural No 210.3 (165.8, 264.8) 55 (4, 114) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Randolph County Rural No 265.0 (227.5, 307.2) 12 (1, 65) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Ray County Urban No 240.4 (205.2, 280.2) 20 (3, 84) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.9)
Reynolds County Rural No 229.6 (174.0, 301.0) 33 (1, 113) 12 stable stable trend 6.7 (-2.8, 27.3)
Ripley County Rural No 293.4 (239.3, 357.0) 2 (1, 57) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.8)
Saline County Rural No 235.3 (199.3, 276.3) 26 (3, 93) 32 stable stable trend 12.0 (-0.5, 22.1)
Schuyler County Rural No 177.1 (112.4, 269.0) 98 (2, 115) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.8, 0.3)
Scotland County Rural No 125.3 (75.7, 198.5) 115 (32, 115) 4 falling falling trend -23.8 (-46.2, -2.2)
Scott County Rural No 202.6 (176.9, 231.2) 69 (18, 108) 47 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Shannon County Rural No 288.2 (221.4, 370.8) 3 (1, 103) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.7)
Shelby County Rural No 226.3 (165.9, 304.2) 36 (1, 115) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.5)
St. Charles County Urban No 161.5 (153.8, 169.4) 112 (95, 114) 359 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
St. Clair County Rural No 287.0 (233.6, 350.9) 4 (1, 68) 23 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.2, 18.6)
St. Francois County Rural No 247.8 (225.7, 271.6) 16 (5, 56) 99 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
St. Louis City Urban No 194.9 (184.4, 205.9) 79 (50, 98) 288 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -2.7)
St. Louis County Urban No 174.9 (170.0, 180.0) 102 (85, 108) 1,012 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Ste. Genevieve County Rural No 174.3 (143.5, 210.3) 103 (33, 115) 24 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Stoddard County Rural No 235.0 (205.2, 268.3) 27 (5, 84) 46 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Stone County Rural No 171.0 (148.0, 197.2) 106 (52, 115) 51 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Sullivan County Rural No 217.0 (155.4, 297.0) 49 (1, 115) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.3)
Taney County Rural No 202.8 (182.8, 224.7) 68 (28, 102) 81 stable stable trend 6.4 (-0.6, 11.0)
Texas County Rural No 203.2 (174.4, 235.8) 67 (16, 111) 37 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Vernon County Rural No 205.5 (170.8, 245.7) 62 (10, 112) 26 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Warren County Urban No 165.0 (141.3, 191.7) 111 (56, 115) 38 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.7)
Washington County Rural No 258.1 (222.3, 298.4) 15 (1, 72) 40 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.6, 6.3)
Wayne County Rural No 269.2 (222.4, 324.9) 9 (1, 74) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Webster County Urban No 197.1 (170.5, 226.6) 77 (24, 112) 42 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Worth County Rural No 206.7 (112.8, 359.4) 59 (1, 115) 3
*
*
Wright County Rural No 201.5 (166.0, 242.8) 71 (13, 114) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 6:29 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top