Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Florida by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Orange County Urban No 156.3 (151.8, 160.9) 54 (47, 59) 992 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.4)
Monroe County Rural No 137.9 (125.9, 150.9) 65 (52, 66) 104 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.7, -2.2)
Broward County Urban No 146.8 (143.7, 150.0) 61 (54, 64) 1,725 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -2.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 151.2 (120.9, 188.0) 57 (20, 67) 18 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.7)
Liberty County Rural No 181.5 (129.9, 247.7) 35 (2, 67) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.0, 0.2)
Franklin County Rural No 168.1 (135.9, 207.6) 44 (11, 66) 19 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.5, 0.3)
St. Johns County Urban No 143.8 (136.3, 151.7) 62 (52, 66) 287 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.7)
Collier County Urban Yes 116.5 (111.6, 121.7) 67 (66, 67) 507 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Hillsborough County Urban No 167.7 (163.5, 172.1) 47 (38, 52) 1,254 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.9)
Palm Beach County Urban No 133.7 (130.8, 136.7) 66 (62, 66) 1,692 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.2, -1.9)
Suwannee County Rural No 201.4 (180.1, 224.9) 22 (7, 45) 67 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Taylor County Rural No 214.3 (182.4, 250.8) 18 (2, 47) 34 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.5)
Clay County Urban No 193.6 (182.3, 205.4) 27 (16, 39) 240 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Lee County Urban No 139.6 (135.6, 143.7) 64 (59, 66) 1,048 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Leon County Urban No 166.5 (156.6, 176.9) 49 (34, 57) 226 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Manatee County Urban No 143.6 (138.0, 149.4) 63 (54, 65) 550 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.7)
Baker County Urban No 222.4 (188.1, 261.1) 14 (2, 43) 32 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Duval County Urban No 196.0 (190.2, 201.9) 25 (17, 33) 964 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Gadsden County Urban No 223.3 (198.2, 250.9) 13 (2, 35) 62 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Levy County Urban No 225.1 (202.9, 249.5) 12 (2, 29) 83 falling falling trend -1.9 (-6.6, -1.0)
St. Lucie County Urban No 165.1 (158.3, 172.3) 50 (38, 55) 465 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Walton County Urban No 192.5 (175.1, 211.2) 28 (14, 47) 102 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Alachua County Urban No 182.6 (172.4, 193.4) 34 (21, 47) 248 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
Lake County Urban No 170.6 (164.2, 177.2) 41 (34, 52) 585 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Okaloosa County Urban No 182.7 (171.5, 194.4) 33 (21, 47) 215 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.4)
Pinellas County Urban No 162.1 (158.1, 166.2) 51 (43, 55) 1,320 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Bay County Urban No 190.7 (179.3, 202.6) 30 (17, 42) 222 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Bradford County Rural No 202.4 (173.3, 235.2) 21 (4, 54) 36 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Charlotte County Urban No 149.9 (142.2, 158.1) 59 (49, 65) 374 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Miami-Dade County Urban No 150.6 (147.8, 153.5) 58 (51, 61) 2,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Pasco County Urban No 179.0 (173.3, 184.9) 38 (29, 44) 778 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Seminole County Urban No 168.0 (160.7, 175.4) 46 (36, 54) 423 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Calhoun County Rural No 206.3 (167.4, 252.3) 19 (2, 61) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.7)
Flagler County Urban No 168.8 (157.9, 180.4) 43 (31, 56) 204 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Hernando County Urban No 192.4 (183.0, 202.3) 29 (17, 38) 336 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Marion County Urban No 194.3 (187.4, 201.5) 26 (17, 35) 671 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Washington County Urban No 225.9 (194.5, 261.2) 11 (2, 38) 38 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Hamilton County Rural No 244.8 (199.4, 298.1) 5 (2, 40) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Hendry County Rural No 178.1 (153.5, 205.5) 39 (14, 64) 38 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Highlands County Urban No 153.6 (142.4, 165.6) 55 (41, 65) 177 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Nassau County Urban No 186.1 (171.5, 201.7) 32 (16, 49) 132 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Sarasota County Urban No 152.4 (147.1, 157.9) 56 (49, 62) 805 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Volusia County Urban No 190.2 (184.5, 196.1) 31 (21, 37) 886 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Citrus County Urban No 197.4 (187.0, 208.4) 24 (15, 37) 349 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Osceola County Urban No 173.1 (164.4, 182.1) 40 (30, 52) 323 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Putnam County Rural No 233.9 (215.6, 253.6) 6 (2, 20) 134 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Santa Rosa County Urban No 204.5 (191.9, 217.8) 20 (10, 34) 218 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Wakulla County Urban No 226.3 (195.4, 260.6) 10 (2, 39) 44 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.4)
Lafayette County Rural No 198.0 (145.9, 263.7) 23 (2, 67) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.3)
Madison County Rural No 255.9 (216.6, 300.9) 2 (2, 29) 32 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Martin County Urban No 159.0 (150.1, 168.5) 52 (40, 61) 271 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Escambia County Urban No 226.9 (216.9, 237.2) 9 (4, 19) 417 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Hardee County Rural No 166.9 (139.3, 198.6) 48 (15, 66) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Indian River County Urban No 180.2 (170.4, 190.6) 36 (25, 48) 312 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.6)
Okeechobee County Rural No 214.5 (191.6, 239.7) 17 (3, 38) 65 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Sumter County Urban No 147.9 (138.3, 158.3) 60 (48, 66) 332 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.0, 0.0)
Columbia County Rural No 228.7 (209.4, 249.4) 8 (2, 23) 109 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Gulf County Rural No 216.3 (179.1, 260.1) 16 (2, 52) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.8)
Holmes County Rural No 221.5 (187.5, 260.5) 15 (2, 43) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
DeSoto County Rural No 170.1 (149.1, 193.6) 42 (19, 64) 49 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Dixie County Rural No 251.4 (216.5, 291.5) 4 (2, 27) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.8)
Jackson County Rural No 233.4 (210.4, 258.3) 7 (2, 25) 78 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Brevard County Urban No 179.5 (174.1, 185.0) 37 (29, 44) 904 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)
Glades County Rural No 156.8 (126.4, 194.7) 53 (17, 67) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 2.7)
Gilchrist County Urban No 253.8 (215.8, 297.2) 3 (2, 26) 33 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.7)
Union County Rural No 563.6 (500.4, 633.0) 1 (1, 1) 63 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.2)
Polk County Urban No 168.0 (162.9, 173.3) 45 (37, 52) 844 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 2.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 6:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top