Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County
All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mecklenburg County | Urban | Yes | 116.3 (112.4, 120.3) | 93 (78, 97) | 688 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.7, -1.3) |
| Wake County | Urban | Yes | 107.9 (104.3, 111.7) | 98 (88, 100) | 668 |
falling
|
-4.2 (-6.4, -1.9) |
| Guilford County | Urban | No | 128.2 (122.9, 133.6) | 74 (50, 87) | 458 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
| Forsyth County | Urban | No | 139.2 (132.8, 145.8) | 47 (25, 71) | 373 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.6) |
| Cumberland County | Urban | No | 152.6 (144.7, 160.9) | 24 (9, 50) | 283 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.1, -0.1) |
| Buncombe County | Urban | Yes | 118.7 (112.2, 125.5) | 91 (66, 97) | 265 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.0, -1.1) |
| Durham County | Urban | Yes | 122.3 (115.2, 129.6) | 86 (55, 96) | 236 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-4.0, -0.2) |
| Gaston County | Urban | No | 138.0 (129.9, 146.6) | 51 (25, 80) | 222 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.6, -0.7) |
| New Hanover County | Urban | No | 128.8 (121.1, 136.9) | 72 (41, 91) | 221 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Brunswick County | Urban | No | 125.6 (116.8, 135.0) | 79 (45, 96) | 193 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
| Davidson County | Urban | No | 146.2 (136.8, 156.2) | 32 (13, 66) | 188 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.2, 0.0) |
| Alamance County | Urban | No | 143.3 (133.9, 153.2) | 37 (15, 73) | 180 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.0, 0.1) |
| Johnston County | Urban | No | 137.8 (128.6, 147.5) | 52 (22, 81) | 176 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
| Union County | Urban | Yes | 121.2 (113.0, 129.9) | 89 (56, 97) | 166 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.1, -0.3) |
| Iredell County | Urban | No | 127.3 (118.6, 136.4) | 77 (42, 94) | 165 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.9, -0.4) |
| Cabarrus County | Urban | No | 123.2 (114.9, 132.0) | 83 (51, 96) | 165 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.8, -1.0) |
| Catawba County | Urban | No | 132.0 (122.7, 141.9) | 66 (29, 90) | 157 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.6) |
| Randolph County | Urban | No | 143.6 (133.2, 154.6) | 36 (14, 77) | 149 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.5) |
| Onslow County | Urban | No | 175.4 (162.8, 188.7) | 4 (1, 24) | 149 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.5, 1.1) |
| Rowan County | Urban | No | 141.2 (131.0, 152.1) | 43 (17, 80) | 149 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-6.7, -0.8) |
| Henderson County | Urban | No | 129.8 (120.0, 140.3) | 70 (36, 93) | 147 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
| Pitt County | Urban | No | 142.0 (131.7, 152.9) | 41 (16, 76) | 147 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.8, -0.3) |
| Wayne County | Urban | No | 162.0 (149.4, 175.5) | 14 (2, 44) | 128 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.2, 0.4) |
| Cleveland County | Rural | No | 161.9 (148.8, 175.9) | 15 (3, 46) | 120 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.8, 0.6) |
| Harnett County | Rural | No | 154.3 (142.1, 167.4) | 22 (6, 59) | 120 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
| Moore County | Urban | No | 124.7 (114.2, 136.0) | 82 (41, 98) | 117 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.8, -0.3) |
| Robeson County | Rural | No | 152.1 (139.7, 165.4) | 26 (6, 65) | 116 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.4, 0.3) |
| Craven County | Rural | No | 137.5 (125.8, 150.1) | 54 (18, 86) | 110 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Rockingham County | Urban | No | 136.7 (124.8, 149.6) | 57 (19, 91) | 104 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.0, -0.9) |
| Burke County | Urban | No | 137.2 (125.1, 150.3) | 55 (17, 90) | 102 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.0) |
| Orange County | Urban | Yes | 110.0 (100.5, 120.3) | 95 (72, 100) | 101 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.7, -1.4) |
| Nash County | Urban | No | 136.8 (124.8, 149.8) | 56 (19, 88) | 100 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.5, -0.1) |
| Caldwell County | Urban | No | 151.9 (138.2, 166.7) | 27 (5, 71) | 97 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.2, 0.6) |
| Carteret County | Rural | No | 139.2 (126.2, 153.6) | 46 (13, 88) | 93 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.9, -0.2) |
| Surry County | Rural | No | 155.2 (141.0, 170.8) | 19 (3, 64) | 92 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.6) |
| Chatham County | Urban | Yes | 114.1 (102.9, 126.4) | 94 (57, 100) | 85 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.7, 0.0) |
| Lincoln County | Urban | No | 125.4 (113.4, 138.6) | 80 (33, 98) | 83 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
| Wilson County | Rural | No | 135.9 (122.8, 150.2) | 59 (18, 93) | 83 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-8.4, -1.2) |
| Wilkes County | Rural | No | 139.2 (125.1, 154.6) | 48 (12, 92) | 79 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-0.9, 0.2) |
| Rutherford County | Rural | No | 141.0 (126.8, 156.6) | 44 (11, 90) | 77 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.2) |
| Haywood County | Rural | No | 126.3 (113.2, 140.9) | 78 (29, 98) | 75 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.8, 0.0) |
| Stanly County | Rural | No | 151.7 (136.0, 168.9) | 29 (4, 75) | 71 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
| Sampson County | Rural | No | 164.1 (147.0, 182.8) | 11 (1, 55) | 70 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.6, 1.3) |
| Columbus County | Rural | No | 165.7 (147.7, 185.6) | 6 (1, 58) | 66 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.9, 0.9) |
| Lenoir County | Rural | No | 144.0 (128.1, 161.5) | 35 (8, 89) | 66 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.9, 0.0) |
| Granville County | Rural | No | 152.8 (136.4, 170.8) | 23 (3, 77) | 66 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.4, 0.1) |
| Halifax County | Rural | No | 157.7 (140.2, 177.1) | 18 (2, 74) | 65 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.4, 0.5) |
| Edgecombe County | Urban | No | 158.4 (140.8, 177.9) | 16 (2, 72) | 64 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.3, 0.2) |
| Pender County | Urban | No | 144.5 (128.6, 162.0) | 34 (7, 87) | 63 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.6) |
| Franklin County | Urban | No | 125.3 (111.3, 140.8) | 81 (29, 99) | 61 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.5, -0.1) |
| Lee County | Rural | No | 133.3 (118.2, 149.9) | 63 (16, 95) | 59 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.0, 0.4) |
| McDowell County | Rural | No | 164.1 (145.3, 185.2) | 10 (1, 64) | 59 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.8, 1.6) |
| Stokes County | Urban | No | 151.8 (134.0, 171.6) | 28 (3, 82) | 58 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.6, 0.3) |
| Richmond County | Rural | No | 187.9 (166.1, 211.9) | 3 (1, 29) | 57 |
stable
|
4.4 (-0.1, 13.8) |
| Vance County | Rural | No | 164.9 (145.1, 186.9) | 7 (1, 64) | 54 |
stable
|
0.7 (-3.7, 5.4) |
| Duplin County | Rural | No | 146.8 (128.8, 166.7) | 31 (4, 88) | 53 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.7, 0.4) |
| Beaufort County | Rural | No | 123.2 (107.9, 140.5) | 84 (25, 100) | 51 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.0, 0.0) |
| Davie County | Urban | No | 131.4 (115.0, 149.8) | 67 (12, 98) | 49 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.4, 1.1) |
| Macon County | Rural | No | 130.8 (113.9, 150.1) | 69 (12, 99) | 49 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.7, 0.3) |
| Person County | Urban | No | 142.5 (124.5, 162.9) | 40 (5, 92) | 47 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.1, 0.3) |
| Scotland County | Rural | No | 168.1 (145.5, 193.6) | 5 (1, 69) | 42 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.4, 0.9) |
| Yadkin County | Urban | No | 138.5 (119.8, 159.8) | 49 (7, 96) | 42 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.3, 0.2) |
| Cherokee County | Rural | No | 127.4 (109.6, 148.4) | 76 (17, 100) | 42 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.1, -0.2) |
| Hoke County | Urban | No | 164.4 (141.8, 189.4) | 9 (1, 75) | 41 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.8, 0.9) |
| Transylvania County | Rural | Yes | 109.4 (93.5, 128.1) | 96 (46, 100) | 40 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.9, -0.4) |
| Pasquotank County | Rural | No | 132.9 (114.6, 153.6) | 65 (9, 98) | 40 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.8, -0.6) |
| Dare County | Rural | No | 128.5 (110.3, 149.3) | 73 (15, 99) | 39 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.9, -0.5) |
| Alexander County | Urban | No | 133.3 (114.5, 154.7) | 64 (12, 99) | 38 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.6, 0.7) |
| Ashe County | Rural | No | 138.5 (118.2, 162.3) | 50 (5, 98) | 37 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.3, 1.0) |
| Watauga County | Rural | Yes | 116.6 (99.8, 135.8) | 92 (34, 100) | 37 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.1, 0.4) |
| Bladen County | Rural | No | 141.3 (120.7, 165.0) | 42 (4, 97) | 37 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.2, 0.3) |
| Jackson County | Rural | Yes | 108.0 (91.5, 126.9) | 97 (54, 100) | 33 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.2, -0.9) |
| Martin County | Rural | No | 158.0 (133.4, 186.8) | 17 (1, 86) | 32 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.8, 7.0) |
| Montgomery County | Rural | No | 130.8 (109.6, 155.7) | 68 (9, 100) | 28 |
stable
|
14.2 (-2.0, 27.0) |
| Polk County | Rural | No | 127.9 (103.1, 158.3) | 75 (5, 100) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.2, 0.5) |
| Anson County | Urban | No | 164.5 (136.7, 197.0) | 8 (1, 85) | 27 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.3, 2.8) |
| Caswell County | Rural | No | 140.3 (116.6, 168.3) | 45 (3, 99) | 27 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.9, 0.5) |
| Hertford County | Rural | No | 143.1 (118.3, 172.5) | 39 (2, 99) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.9, -0.3) |
| Currituck County | Urban | No | 134.5 (110.9, 161.9) | 62 (5, 100) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.8, -0.4) |
| Northampton County | Rural | No | 136.0 (110.2, 167.4) | 58 (4, 100) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.0, 0.1) |
| Madison County | Urban | No | 137.7 (113.4, 166.6) | 53 (3, 99) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.6, -0.1) |
| Warren County | Rural | No | 135.7 (110.3, 166.4) | 60 (4, 100) | 24 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-3.2, -0.1) |
| Bertie County | Rural | No | 152.1 (123.4, 186.9) | 25 (1, 98) | 23 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.9, -0.1) |
| Yancey County | Rural | Yes | 121.8 (99.9, 148.5) | 88 (15, 100) | 23 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-3.2, -0.3) |
| Mitchell County | Rural | No | 163.7 (132.2, 201.9) | 13 (1, 93) | 22 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.6, 2.2) |
| Swain County | Rural | No | 203.0 (165.5, 247.4) | 1 (1, 51) | 22 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.3, 2.8) |
| Washington County | Rural | No | 188.9 (149.4, 237.5) | 2 (1, 77) | 19 |
rising
|
4.0 (1.2, 16.0) |
| Pamlico County | Rural | No | 143.1 (109.4, 186.4) | 38 (1, 100) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.4, 1.3) |
| Perquimans County | Rural | No | 135.1 (106.0, 171.5) | 61 (3, 100) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.1, 1.5) |
| Avery County | Rural | Yes | 119.7 (94.8, 150.8) | 90 (11, 100) | 17 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.5, 0.2) |
| Chowan County | Rural | Yes | 122.4 (95.7, 155.9) | 85 (7, 100) | 16 |
stable
|
-2.0 (-20.5, 0.6) |
| Alleghany County | Rural | No | 149.1 (114.9, 192.7) | 30 (1, 100) | 16 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.1, 0.8) |
| Greene County | Rural | Yes | 106.5 (83.3, 135.2) | 99 (26, 100) | 15 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-4.0, 0.2) |
| Clay County | Rural | Yes | 102.6 (77.9, 136.3) | 100 (23, 100) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.0, 0.1) |
| Jones County | Rural | No | 154.6 (117.6, 202.3) | 21 (1, 100) | 13 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.4, 3.0) |
| Graham County | Rural | No | 163.9 (122.7, 217.6) | 12 (1, 99) | 11 |
stable
|
0.9 (-1.3, 3.4) |
| Gates County | Urban | No | 145.6 (108.2, 193.4) | 33 (1, 100) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.2, 0.6) |
| Camden County | Urban | No | 129.6 (93.7, 176.1) | 71 (1, 100) | 9 |
stable
|
17.9 (-2.5, 35.8) |
| Hyde County | Rural | Yes | 122.2 (80.5, 189.1) | 87 (1, 100) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.9, 1.4) |
| Tyrrell County | Rural | No | 154.7 (100.0, 240.2) | 20 (1, 100) | 5 |
stable
|
-2.4 (-7.0, 1.7) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/30/2026 11:45 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).
Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.


