Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
County |
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tennessee | No | 142.7 (141.2, 144.3) | N/A | 6,603 | falling | -1.2 (-1.4, -1.1) |
United States | No | 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) | N/A | 283,896 | falling | -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7) |
Overton County | No | 197.2 (168.1, 230.7) | 1 (1, 56) | 35 | stable | 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2) |
Scott County | No | 193.9 (163.8, 228.4) | 2 (1, 56) | 30 | stable | 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8) |
Hardeman County | No | 193.2 (163.8, 227.0) | 3 (1, 59) | 34 | stable | 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3) |
Benton County | No | 189.8 (157.8, 227.8) | 4 (1, 67) | 27 | rising | 1.2 (0.1, 2.2) |
Crockett County | No | 189.7 (152.2, 234.4) | 5 (1, 80) | 19 | stable | 1.1 (0.0, 2.3) |
Carroll County | No | 185.8 (160.8, 214.1) | 6 (1, 58) | 42 | stable | -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2) |
Houston County | No | 185.4 (140.1, 242.9) | 7 (1, 92) | 12 | stable | 0.8 (-0.4, 2.1) |
Perry County | No | 184.7 (137.1, 245.5) | 8 (1, 92) | 11 | stable | 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7) |
Grundy County | No | 182.9 (146.7, 226.6) | 9 (1, 83) | 19 | stable | 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5) |
Lauderdale County | No | 182.9 (154.8, 215.1) | 10 (1, 74) | 31 | stable | -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6) |
Johnson County | No | 181.9 (149.5, 220.5) | 11 (1, 88) | 26 | stable | 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1) |
Dickson County | No | 178.7 (159.3, 200.0) | 12 (1, 54) | 64 | stable | 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0) |
Gibson County | No | 172.8 (154.3, 193.2) | 13 (2, 62) | 66 | stable | 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5) |
McNairy County | No | 172.8 (147.3, 201.9) | 14 (1, 80) | 36 | stable | 0.6 (-0.2, 1.3) |
Chester County | No | 169.4 (137.9, 206.6) | 15 (1, 91) | 21 | stable | 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0) |
Hickman County | No | 169.0 (141.6, 200.6) | 16 (1, 85) | 29 | stable | -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8) |
Meigs County | No | 168.8 (131.7, 214.4) | 17 (1, 92) | 15 | stable | 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5) |
Lake County | No | 167.6 (117.5, 237.0) | 18 (1, 95) | 8 | stable | -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8) |
Claiborne County | No | 166.5 (143.4, 192.7) | 19 (2, 84) | 40 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6) |
Cheatham County | No | 166.4 (143.9, 191.6) | 20 (2, 81) | 42 | stable | -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1) |
Polk County | No | 165.6 (135.6, 201.3) | 21 (1, 90) | 23 | stable | -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2) |
Campbell County | No | 165.5 (145.4, 188.0) | 22 (3, 80) | 52 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
Smith County | No | 163.9 (134.0, 199.1) | 23 (1, 90) | 22 | stable | 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1) |
Rhea County | No | 163.3 (141.0, 188.7) | 24 (2, 85) | 40 | stable | -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4) |
Dyer County | No | 162.8 (141.5, 186.6) | 25 (3, 83) | 44 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3) |
Weakley County | No | 162.1 (139.3, 187.9) | 26 (3, 87) | 39 | stable | 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5) |
Monroe County | No | 161.7 (142.7, 182.9) | 27 (4, 82) | 58 | stable | -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4) |
Henderson County | No | 161.4 (136.9, 189.4) | 28 (2, 88) | 33 | stable | 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7) |
Stewart County | No | 160.8 (126.7, 202.5) | 29 (1, 93) | 16 | stable | -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3) |
Hawkins County | No | 160.7 (143.7, 179.4) | 30 (5, 78) | 72 | stable | -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3) |
Wayne County | No | 160.6 (130.1, 197.8) | 31 (1, 92) | 21 | stable | 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9) |
Greene County | No | 160.3 (145.5, 176.3) | 32 (7, 72) | 93 | stable | 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7) |
Macon County | No | 160.1 (132.9, 191.6) | 33 (2, 90) | 25 | stable | -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6) |
Tipton County | No | 160.0 (142.3, 179.5) | 34 (6, 81) | 61 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
Warren County | No | 158.8 (138.8, 181.3) | 35 (4, 86) | 47 | stable | 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0) |
DeKalb County | No | 156.0 (129.0, 187.9) | 36 (1, 92) | 24 | stable | -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7) |
Lawrence County | No | 154.4 (135.5, 175.6) | 37 (6, 86) | 50 | stable | -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2) |
Unicoi County | No | 154.2 (126.5, 187.4) | 38 (2, 93) | 24 | stable | -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6) |
Grainger County | No | 153.7 (128.7, 182.9) | 39 (4, 92) | 29 | stable | 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0) |
Humphreys County | No | 152.8 (124.8, 186.0) | 40 (2, 94) | 22 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5) |
Sevier County | No | 152.5 (139.7, 166.3) | 41 (14, 80) | 113 | stable | -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4) |
Bedford County | No | 152.4 (133.3, 173.7) | 42 (8, 88) | 47 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
Fentress County | No | 150.9 (123.5, 183.6) | 43 (3, 93) | 23 | stable | -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2) |
Coffee County | No | 150.9 (133.9, 169.5) | 44 (10, 87) | 60 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Clay County | No | 148.7 (109.3, 201.3) | 45 (1, 95) | 10 | stable | -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2) |
Montgomery County | No | 148.7 (137.2, 160.8) | 46 (19, 81) | 130 | falling | -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2) |
Roane County | No | 148.5 (132.6, 166.1) | 47 (14, 87) | 70 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
Henry County | No | 148.2 (128.4, 170.7) | 48 (9, 91) | 44 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Morgan County | No | 148.0 (120.0, 181.4) | 49 (3, 94) | 21 | stable | -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5) |
Madison County | No | 147.9 (135.2, 161.7) | 50 (18, 84) | 105 | stable | 1.2 (-1.4, 3.8) |
Sullivan County | No | 147.5 (138.1, 157.5) | 51 (24, 79) | 200 | stable | -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0) |
Union County | No | 146.7 (119.3, 179.2) | 52 (4, 94) | 21 | stable | 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0) |
White County | No | 145.8 (123.4, 171.7) | 53 (7, 93) | 32 | stable | -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4) |
Marshall County | No | 145.5 (124.1, 169.9) | 54 (7, 93) | 34 | stable | -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0) |
Decatur County | No | 145.3 (112.1, 187.0) | 55 (2, 95) | 15 | stable | -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1) |
Maury County | No | 145.3 (132.0, 159.6) | 56 (19, 87) | 93 | falling | -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3) |
Bradley County | No | 145.2 (133.0, 158.3) | 57 (22, 87) | 110 | stable | -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0) |
Washington County | No | 145.2 (134.2, 156.9) | 58 (24, 84) | 137 | stable | -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5) |
Shelby County | No | 145.0 (140.6, 149.6) | 59 (39, 73) | 836 | falling | -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4) |
Putnam County | No | 144.4 (130.1, 160.0) | 60 (20, 89) | 78 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2) |
Cocke County | No | 144.4 (125.2, 166.2) | 61 (12, 92) | 43 | falling | -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
McMinn County | No | 144.4 (128.1, 162.4) | 62 (15, 91) | 61 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2) |
Lincoln County | No | 143.5 (123.7, 166.0) | 63 (11, 93) | 39 | falling | -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2) |
Robertson County | No | 143.3 (127.8, 160.3) | 64 (18, 90) | 64 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1) |
Franklin County | No | 141.5 (122.7, 162.7) | 65 (13, 93) | 45 | stable | -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Giles County | No | 141.4 (120.1, 165.9) | 66 (11, 93) | 33 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Anderson County | No | 141.3 (127.9, 156.0) | 67 (25, 90) | 88 | falling | -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2) |
Sumner County | No | 141.2 (131.9, 151.0) | 68 (34, 86) | 177 | falling | -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2) |
Lewis County | No | 140.1 (107.9, 180.3) | 69 (3, 95) | 14 | stable | -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5) |
Marion County | No | 138.7 (117.2, 163.5) | 70 (13, 94) | 31 | stable | -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0) |
Hardin County | No | 138.3 (116.5, 163.7) | 71 (12, 94) | 31 | stable | -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8) |
Blount County | No | 138.2 (128.0, 149.0) | 72 (33, 89) | 146 | falling | -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1) |
Van Buren County | No | 138.1 (94.8, 199.5) | 73 (1, 95) | 7 | falling | -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2) |
Hamblen County | No | 137.1 (122.5, 153.2) | 74 (27, 92) | 67 | falling | -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3) |
Obion County | No | 136.5 (116.2, 159.7) | 75 (16, 94) | 35 | falling | -4.8 (-9.1, -0.2) |
Jackson County | No | 136.0 (105.9, 174.5) | 76 (7, 95) | 14 | stable | -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5) |
Hancock County | No | 135.6 (93.9, 192.9) | 77 (1, 95) | 7 | stable | 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7) |
Knox County | No | 135.2 (129.4, 141.3) | 78 (52, 87) | 422 | falling | -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8) |
Cumberland County | No | 135.2 (121.1, 150.9) | 79 (30, 93) | 83 | falling | -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
Davidson County | No | 134.4 (129.2, 139.8) | 80 (57, 87) | 517 | falling | -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6) |
Rutherford County | No | 134.2 (126.0, 142.8) | 81 (47, 90) | 207 | falling | -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8) |
Cannon County | No | 133.7 (103.5, 171.0) | 82 (8, 95) | 14 | stable | 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4) |
Jefferson County | No | 132.8 (117.5, 149.9) | 83 (30, 93) | 57 | falling | -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
Sequatchie County | No | 132.4 (103.5, 168.0) | 84 (9, 95) | 15 | stable | 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9) |
Carter County | No | 131.9 (117.2, 148.3) | 85 (32, 94) | 63 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Trousdale County | No | 129.7 (89.9, 182.1) | 86 (2, 95) | 7 | stable | -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3) |
Wilson County | No | 126.2 (115.9, 137.3) | 87 (56, 93) | 114 | falling | -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
Haywood County | No | 125.6 (100.2, 156.3) | 88 (20, 95) | 18 | stable | -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3) |
Hamilton County | No | 123.7 (117.7, 130.0) | 89 (73, 93) | 335 | falling | -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1) |
Fayette County | No | 122.8 (105.8, 142.3) | 90 (41, 95) | 40 | falling | -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4) |
Loudon County | Yes | 120.6 (106.5, 136.5) | 91 (48, 95) | 61 | falling | -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
Bledsoe County | Yes | 120.4 (92.1, 156.8) | 92 (14, 95) | 13 | falling | -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1) |
Moore County | Yes | 110.6 (69.8, 169.3) | 93 (6, 95) | 5 | falling | -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3) |
Williamson County | Yes | 107.1 (99.3, 115.5) | 94 (87, 95) | 142 | falling | -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2) |
Pickett County | Yes | 100.2 (59.2, 164.3) | 95 (8, 95) | 5 | stable | -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2024 9:06 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2024 9:06 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.