Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
County |
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | No | 137.2 (135.4, 139.0) | N/A | 4,742 | falling | -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1) |
United States | No | 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) | N/A | 283,896 | falling | -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7) |
Clarke County | No | 157.7 (133.0, 186.2) | 10 (1, 61) | 31 | stable | 14.2 (-1.0, 31.6) |
Fayette County | No | 172.4 (140.7, 210.1) | 3 (1, 59) | 23 | stable | 0.5 (-0.5, 1.4) |
Bullock County | No | 180.2 (136.1, 235.5) | 1 (1, 64) | 12 | stable | 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7) |
Crenshaw County | No | 177.9 (142.2, 221.0) | 2 (1, 56) | 19 | stable | 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2) |
Geneva County | No | 146.9 (123.8, 173.6) | 23 (1, 64) | 31 | stable | 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3) |
Covington County | No | 162.0 (141.8, 184.6) | 8 (1, 51) | 51 | stable | 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8) |
Wilcox County | No | 168.5 (129.8, 216.5) | 4 (1, 64) | 14 | stable | 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2) |
Blount County | No | 162.9 (145.7, 181.8) | 7 (1, 42) | 68 | stable | 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8) |
Clay County | No | 146.2 (114.7, 185.1) | 24 (1, 67) | 16 | stable | 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2) |
Walker County | No | 154.3 (138.8, 171.2) | 14 (2, 49) | 77 | stable | 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4) |
Marion County | No | 152.3 (130.2, 177.6) | 16 (1, 61) | 37 | stable | -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7) |
Sumter County | No | 164.5 (126.2, 211.6) | 6 (1, 66) | 15 | stable | -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2) |
DeKalb County | No | 132.1 (117.9, 147.7) | 52 (15, 65) | 65 | stable | -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4) |
Lowndes County | No | 147.9 (110.1, 195.8) | 21 (1, 67) | 11 | stable | -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9) |
Morgan County | No | 148.8 (137.2, 161.3) | 19 (5, 49) | 127 | stable | -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2) |
Chilton County | No | 130.9 (113.1, 150.9) | 54 (9, 67) | 40 | stable | -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5) |
Henry County | No | 129.3 (103.6, 160.6) | 55 (3, 67) | 19 | stable | -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8) |
Dallas County | No | 140.6 (121.1, 162.5) | 34 (4, 65) | 40 | stable | -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Lamar County | No | 147.8 (116.9, 185.7) | 22 (1, 67) | 17 | stable | -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
Perry County | No | 137.7 (101.7, 184.2) | 41 (1, 67) | 11 | stable | -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0) |
Russell County | No | 161.7 (143.6, 181.6) | 9 (1, 44) | 60 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
Barbour County | No | 156.1 (129.8, 186.7) | 13 (1, 64) | 28 | stable | -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4) |
Colbert County | No | 149.7 (133.4, 167.6) | 18 (3, 56) | 66 | stable | -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0) |
Jackson County | No | 157.0 (139.5, 176.3) | 11 (1, 50) | 64 | stable | -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0) |
Tallapoosa County | No | 142.8 (123.8, 164.2) | 31 (4, 63) | 46 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3) |
Cherokee County | No | 139.4 (117.2, 165.4) | 36 (3, 66) | 30 | stable | -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1) |
Coffee County | No | 142.5 (125.4, 161.5) | 32 (4, 63) | 52 | stable | -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0) |
Franklin County | No | 144.8 (122.7, 170.0) | 26 (2, 64) | 32 | stable | -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2) |
Chambers County | No | 143.0 (122.5, 166.2) | 30 (3, 64) | 38 | falling | -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
Cullman County | Yes | 122.0 (109.7, 135.5) | 61 (31, 66) | 75 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2) |
Escambia County | No | 137.9 (117.9, 160.6) | 40 (5, 65) | 36 | falling | -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
Lawrence County | No | 144.3 (123.4, 168.1) | 27 (3, 64) | 36 | stable | -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
Marengo County | No | 152.2 (124.9, 184.4) | 17 (1, 64) | 23 | stable | -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2) |
Marshall County | No | 134.5 (122.1, 148.0) | 47 (14, 63) | 90 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1) |
Pike County | No | 143.0 (120.1, 169.3) | 29 (2, 65) | 29 | stable | -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2) |
Talladega County | No | 148.0 (134.3, 163.0) | 20 (5, 53) | 89 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3) |
Butler County | No | 132.6 (107.6, 162.4) | 50 (3, 67) | 22 | stable | -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3) |
Conecuh County | No | 168.3 (132.4, 212.1) | 5 (1, 63) | 17 | stable | -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1) |
Macon County | No | 153.3 (124.6, 187.5) | 15 (1, 64) | 23 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1) |
Monroe County | No | 127.7 (104.1, 155.8) | 57 (5, 67) | 22 | stable | -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1) |
Randolph County | No | 137.1 (113.0, 165.4) | 44 (3, 66) | 25 | stable | -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3) |
Cleburne County | No | 128.7 (100.2, 163.8) | 56 (3, 67) | 15 | stable | -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4) |
Coosa County | No | 137.6 (103.3, 182.1) | 43 (1, 67) | 12 | stable | -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4) |
Greene County | No | 138.8 (99.9, 189.9) | 38 (1, 67) | 10 | stable | -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6) |
Lauderdale County | No | 124.7 (113.2, 137.2) | 59 (28, 66) | 94 | falling | -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4) |
Jefferson County | No | 140.4 (135.4, 145.4) | 35 (20, 49) | 649 | falling | -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8) |
Pickens County | Yes | 120.7 (97.5, 148.8) | 63 (11, 67) | 19 | falling | -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2) |
Washington County | No | 134.5 (105.9, 169.2) | 48 (2, 67) | 16 | falling | -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1) |
Baldwin County | No | 127.6 (119.9, 135.8) | 58 (33, 64) | 216 | falling | -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8) |
Bibb County | No | 137.7 (111.7, 168.5) | 42 (2, 67) | 20 | falling | -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3) |
Calhoun County | No | 156.6 (144.6, 169.5) | 12 (3, 40) | 132 | falling | -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
Dale County | No | 139.3 (122.0, 158.5) | 37 (5, 64) | 48 | falling | -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
Mobile County | No | 144.1 (137.8, 150.7) | 28 (14, 46) | 409 | falling | -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8) |
Autauga County | No | 133.0 (116.6, 151.2) | 49 (10, 65) | 48 | falling | -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5) |
Elmore County | No | 138.1 (124.1, 153.4) | 39 (7, 62) | 73 | falling | -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6) |
Etowah County | No | 145.3 (133.3, 158.1) | 25 (7, 56) | 116 | falling | -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9) |
Montgomery County | No | 141.1 (132.6, 150.1) | 33 (15, 55) | 212 | falling | -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9) |
Choctaw County | Yes | 101.5 (75.4, 135.2) | 67 (20, 67) | 11 | falling | -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5) |
Shelby County | Yes | 104.0 (96.4, 112.0) | 66 (60, 67) | 145 | falling | -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0) |
Madison County | No | 130.9 (124.4, 137.7) | 53 (30, 60) | 313 | falling | -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1) |
Winston County | Yes | 107.4 (87.4, 131.3) | 65 (29, 67) | 22 | falling | -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5) |
Limestone County | Yes | 120.7 (108.8, 133.7) | 64 (37, 67) | 77 | falling | -2.0 (-3.3, -0.6) |
Houston County | Yes | 120.8 (110.0, 132.6) | 62 (37, 66) | 95 | falling | -4.0 (-5.9, -2.1) |
Hale County | No | 132.4 (103.1, 168.4) | 51 (2, 67) | 15 | falling | -4.1 (-6.8, -1.2) |
St. Clair County | No | 135.1 (122.1, 149.3) | 46 (13, 63) | 82 | stable | -4.1 (-8.5, 0.5) |
Lee County | No | 136.3 (125.1, 148.2) | 45 (14, 61) | 113 | falling | -5.4 (-9.7, -0.8) |
Tuscaloosa County | Yes | 122.4 (113.5, 131.8) | 60 (37, 66) | 148 | stable | -6.0 (-12.8, 1.2) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2024 10:04 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2024 10:04 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.