Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for West Virginia by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Webster County Rural No 160.9 (131.1, 196.8) 49 (7, 55) 22 falling falling trend -5.7 (-14.3, -2.8)
Wirt County Urban No 173.4 (134.6, 222.2) 39 (2, 55) 14 falling falling trend -3.6 (-15.3, -1.8)
Nicholas County Rural No 164.6 (146.4, 184.8) 44 (18, 55) 64 falling falling trend -2.0 (-6.3, -1.1)
Doddridge County Rural No 153.0 (122.7, 190.2) 51 (9, 55) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Kanawha County Urban No 169.5 (162.2, 177.2) 42 (29, 49) 432 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Ohio County Urban No 164.0 (149.5, 179.6) 47 (24, 54) 104 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Putnam County Urban No 152.2 (139.8, 165.6) 52 (37, 55) 116 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Tyler County Rural No 141.9 (115.5, 174.1) 54 (24, 55) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.1, -0.1)
Monongalia County Urban No 139.2 (128.6, 150.4) 55 (47, 55) 135 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Boone County Urban No 200.5 (178.4, 224.9) 13 (2, 44) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Braxton County Rural No 174.7 (149.5, 203.9) 37 (6, 55) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Brooke County Urban No 161.0 (142.3, 181.9) 48 (20, 55) 59 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Clay County Urban No 214.6 (178.0, 257.6) 4 (1, 48) 26 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Hampshire County Urban No 179.6 (160.1, 201.3) 33 (6, 52) 67 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.9, 0.3)
Jackson County Rural No 175.3 (157.5, 194.9) 36 (10, 53) 74 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Mineral County Rural No 164.5 (146.9, 183.9) 45 (19, 55) 67 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Hancock County Urban No 175.5 (158.3, 194.4) 35 (10, 52) 82 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Logan County Rural No 200.2 (181.9, 220.1) 14 (2, 38) 95 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.2)
Mingo County Rural No 208.0 (185.1, 233.2) 8 (2, 38) 66 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Preston County Urban No 152.0 (136.3, 169.2) 53 (32, 55) 72 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Calhoun County Rural No 191.9 (153.7, 238.4) 20 (1, 54) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Marshall County Urban No 165.8 (149.2, 183.9) 43 (19, 54) 80 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Cabell County Urban No 183.0 (172.2, 194.4) 30 (13, 44) 225 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
McDowell County Rural No 223.8 (197.6, 253.1) 3 (1, 32) 56 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Upshur County Rural No 173.2 (153.7, 194.9) 40 (10, 54) 61 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Wyoming County Rural No 193.8 (171.2, 218.9) 17 (3, 48) 59 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Berkeley County Urban No 198.5 (187.2, 210.3) 16 (4, 32) 250 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Marion County Rural No 190.5 (176.5, 205.5) 21 (5, 42) 144 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Greenbrier County Rural No 188.0 (171.1, 206.4) 23 (6, 45) 99 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Harrison County Rural No 204.3 (191.1, 218.3) 10 (3, 29) 188 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 189.5 (174.5, 205.5) 22 (6, 43) 126 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Morgan County Urban No 192.4 (168.8, 219.1) 19 (3, 49) 54 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Raleigh County Urban No 169.6 (158.1, 181.9) 41 (22, 52) 172 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Fayette County Urban No 209.3 (192.5, 227.3) 7 (2, 28) 124 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Hardy County Rural No 164.4 (139.5, 193.2) 46 (10, 55) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Mercer County Rural No 186.0 (172.8, 200.1) 24 (8, 45) 158 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Grant County Rural No 159.5 (133.5, 189.9) 50 (11, 55) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Mason County Rural No 204.9 (184.8, 226.8) 9 (2, 39) 81 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Monroe County Rural No 174.5 (149.2, 203.6) 38 (5, 54) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Ritchie County Rural No 182.3 (150.0, 220.6) 32 (2, 55) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Tucker County Rural No 183.2 (149.2, 224.8) 29 (2, 55) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.1)
Barbour County Rural No 203.9 (177.0, 234.1) 12 (1, 46) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.8)
Lewis County Rural No 209.8 (184.7, 238.0) 6 (1, 41) 52 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Pocahontas County Rural No 192.5 (159.3, 232.2) 18 (1, 53) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Summers County Rural No 177.8 (151.0, 209.2) 34 (4, 55) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Wood County Urban No 184.3 (173.5, 195.8) 28 (11, 43) 226 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Roane County Rural No 199.7 (172.6, 230.5) 15 (2, 49) 42 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Taylor County Rural No 185.2 (161.2, 212.3) 27 (3, 52) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 1.7)
Wetzel County Rural No 204.2 (178.1, 233.7) 11 (1, 46) 47 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Pleasants County Rural No 235.4 (193.2, 284.8) 2 (1, 41) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.0)
Gilmer County Rural No 212.5 (172.0, 261.2) 5 (1, 52) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Randolph County Rural No 182.4 (164.2, 202.4) 31 (6, 51) 78 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 7.4)
Pendleton County Rural No 185.8 (150.0, 229.9) 25 (2, 55) 21 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Wayne County Urban No 185.4 (169.8, 202.3) 26 (7, 46) 110 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 4.7)
Lincoln County Rural No 255.5 (228.9, 284.7) 1 (1, 7) 72 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.7, 12.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 5:30 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top