Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A No 165.4 (164.1, 166.7) N/A 13,788 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Fountain County Rural No 214.5 (189.0, 242.8) 1 (1, 41) 53 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Scott County Rural No 213.9 (191.0, 238.9) 2 (1, 35) 67 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 4.4)
Orange County Rural No 205.3 (181.7, 231.5) 3 (1, 53) 58 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Jennings County Rural No 202.9 (182.0, 225.8) 4 (1, 49) 72 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Fayette County Rural No 202.0 (180.1, 226.1) 5 (1, 55) 66 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Pike County Rural No 200.8 (171.6, 234.0) 6 (1, 73) 36 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Grant County Rural No 200.7 (187.6, 214.4) 7 (1, 35) 186 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Henry County Rural No 198.8 (183.9, 214.8) 8 (1, 42) 136 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Blackford County Rural No 195.8 (168.5, 227.0) 9 (1, 79) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Fulton County Rural No 195.5 (172.8, 220.5) 10 (1, 68) 57 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Starke County Rural No 195.0 (174.0, 218.1) 11 (1, 63) 67 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Rush County Rural No 194.6 (169.6, 222.7) 12 (1, 73) 45 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Pulaski County Rural No 194.5 (166.1, 226.9) 13 (1, 81) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Jay County Rural No 194.3 (170.9, 220.2) 14 (1, 70) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.7)
Owen County Urban No 194.2 (171.8, 219.0) 15 (1, 70) 60 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Greene County Rural No 192.7 (174.4, 212.5) 16 (1, 60) 86 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Putnam County Rural No 192.4 (175.1, 211.2) 17 (1, 58) 93 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Jefferson County Rural No 191.1 (173.0, 210.7) 18 (1, 60) 86 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Randolph County Rural No 188.1 (168.2, 209.9) 19 (1, 72) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Vermillion County Urban No 187.4 (161.9, 216.3) 20 (1, 86) 41 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.4)
Clay County Urban No 186.7 (166.8, 208.5) 21 (1, 75) 67 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Lawrence County Rural No 186.4 (171.6, 202.2) 22 (2, 60) 124 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Wabash County Rural No 184.8 (167.8, 203.4) 23 (2, 70) 92 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Vigo County Urban No 184.8 (174.4, 195.7) 24 (7, 52) 246 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Knox County Rural No 182.4 (165.5, 200.6) 25 (3, 75) 90 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Morgan County Urban No 181.7 (169.4, 194.7) 26 (7, 64) 173 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Howard County Urban No 181.7 (170.7, 193.3) 27 (8, 60) 213 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 4.2)
Benton County Urban No 181.2 (148.3, 220.0) 28 (1, 91) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
White County Rural No 180.5 (161.1, 201.9) 29 (2, 82) 66 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Huntington County Rural No 179.9 (163.3, 197.8) 30 (4, 79) 90 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Union County Rural No 178.5 (142.2, 222.2) 31 (1, 92) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Dearborn County Urban No 177.2 (163.0, 192.4) 32 (8, 76) 122 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Madison County Urban No 176.7 (167.9, 185.9) 33 (14, 61) 312 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Washington County Urban No 176.4 (157.2, 197.4) 34 (4, 86) 65 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Miami County Rural No 175.5 (158.7, 193.6) 35 (5, 82) 83 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Clinton County Rural No 175.2 (157.2, 194.7) 36 (4, 85) 72 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Marion County Urban No 174.8 (171.0, 178.7) 37 (25, 52) 1,694 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Decatur County Rural No 174.6 (154.9, 196.3) 38 (3, 88) 59 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Wayne County Rural No 174.3 (162.3, 187.0) 39 (12, 76) 165 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Jackson County Rural No 173.9 (158.9, 190.1) 40 (8, 83) 100 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Clark County Urban No 173.6 (164.1, 183.6) 41 (17, 68) 262 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 4.1)
Sullivan County Urban No 173.4 (152.1, 197.2) 42 (3, 90) 49 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Delaware County Urban No 173.2 (163.5, 183.4) 43 (16, 70) 248 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Franklin County Urban No 172.9 (152.4, 195.6) 44 (4, 90) 55 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Shelby County Urban No 172.5 (157.9, 188.2) 45 (10, 81) 107 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Harrison County Urban No 169.5 (153.9, 186.3) 46 (12, 85) 92 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Vanderburgh County Urban No 169.5 (161.9, 177.3) 47 (25, 71) 400 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
St. Joseph County Urban No 169.3 (162.9, 175.8) 48 (29, 68) 564 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Tipton County Urban No 167.8 (145.1, 193.7) 49 (5, 91) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
DeKalb County Rural No 167.7 (152.4, 184.2) 50 (12, 87) 92 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Noble County Rural No 167.4 (152.5, 183.4) 51 (14, 87) 98 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Adams County Rural No 167.4 (150.2, 186.0) 52 (11, 90) 73 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Martin County Rural No 166.0 (136.4, 200.7) 53 (2, 92) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Floyd County Urban No 165.3 (154.1, 177.1) 54 (26, 86) 171 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Jasper County Urban No 164.2 (147.6, 182.3) 55 (14, 91) 75 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Crawford County Rural No 164.2 (136.1, 197.0) 56 (4, 92) 26 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Whitley County Urban No 164.0 (147.8, 181.6) 57 (17, 90) 79 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Newton County Urban No 163.1 (139.4, 190.2) 58 (7, 92) 35 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.3)
Kosciusko County Rural No 162.8 (151.8, 174.5) 59 (25, 86) 168 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Cass County Rural No 162.8 (147.4, 179.5) 60 (18, 90) 85 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Parke County Rural No 162.2 (139.1, 188.5) 61 (8, 91) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Perry County Rural No 161.5 (140.3, 185.4) 62 (11, 91) 43 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Brown County Urban No 161.4 (139.4, 186.7) 63 (9, 91) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Ohio County Urban No 161.0 (128.3, 201.5) 64 (1, 92) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Allen County Urban No 160.6 (155.2, 166.0) 65 (47, 80) 712 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Steuben County Rural No 160.3 (144.8, 177.3) 66 (19, 91) 83 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Switzerland County Rural No 159.9 (130.8, 194.2) 67 (3, 92) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Bartholomew County Urban No 159.2 (148.3, 170.6) 68 (34, 88) 163 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Montgomery County Rural No 158.7 (143.3, 175.4) 69 (22, 91) 82 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Ripley County Rural No 158.3 (140.9, 177.4) 70 (18, 91) 62 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.4)
Johnson County Urban No 158.1 (150.2, 166.5) 71 (42, 87) 301 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Hancock County Urban No 157.8 (146.9, 169.3) 72 (37, 90) 162 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
LaPorte County Urban No 157.1 (148.2, 166.4) 73 (41, 88) 244 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Wells County Urban No 156.7 (139.0, 176.1) 74 (19, 91) 60 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Porter County Urban No 156.0 (148.6, 163.7) 75 (49, 88) 349 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Lake County Urban No 155.5 (151.2, 160.0) 76 (57, 85) 1,006 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -2.0)
Elkhart County Urban No 154.9 (147.8, 162.2) 77 (50, 88) 369 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
LaGrange County Rural No 154.1 (137.4, 172.2) 78 (25, 91) 65 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Gibson County Rural No 153.5 (137.2, 171.4) 79 (28, 91) 67 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Posey County Urban No 153.5 (135.4, 173.5) 80 (24, 92) 55 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Marshall County Rural No 152.9 (139.0, 167.8) 81 (34, 91) 93 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 2.6)
Warrick County Urban No 152.5 (140.9, 164.8) 82 (43, 91) 133 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Spencer County Rural No 152.2 (131.8, 175.2) 83 (20, 92) 43 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.8)
Tippecanoe County Urban No 151.6 (143.3, 160.2) 84 (52, 91) 257 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Boone County Urban No 151.1 (139.2, 163.8) 85 (45, 91) 122 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Daviess County Rural No 149.0 (132.0, 167.5) 86 (32, 92) 58 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Carroll County Urban No 147.6 (128.5, 169.1) 87 (29, 92) 45 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Warren County Urban No 143.8 (115.6, 177.8) 88 (9, 92) 18 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.1)
Dubois County Rural No 143.8 (130.0, 158.7) 89 (50, 92) 83 falling falling trend -2.0 (-5.3, -1.1)
Hendricks County Urban No 143.7 (136.2, 151.6) 90 (70, 91) 281 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Monroe County Urban No 143.1 (134.4, 152.2) 91 (68, 91) 209 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Hamilton County Urban No 123.7 (118.6, 129.0) 92 (90, 92) 449 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 6:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top