Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A No 142.9 (142.3, 143.5) N/A 42,765 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Motley County Rural No 185.0 (95.4, 332.8) 58 (1, 241) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.7, 3.6)
Oldham County Urban No 177.2 (101.7, 289.3) 76 (1, 241) 3
*
*
Briscoe County Rural No 145.6 (86.4, 240.9) 177 (1, 241) 3
*
*
Irion County Urban No 157.6 (92.4, 258.5) 144 (1, 241) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.5)
Throckmorton County Rural Yes 110.4 (66.1, 188.6) 239 (21, 241) 3 falling falling trend -6.8 (-16.6, -3.1)
Culberson County Rural No 124.1 (75.0, 197.4) 222 (6, 241) 4 rising rising trend 20.1 (0.8, 56.7)
Stonewall County Rural No 192.7 (111.1, 320.2) 33 (1, 241) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 2.7)
Upton County Rural Yes 111.9 (67.3, 175.4) 236 (12, 241) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.9, 1.6)
Schleicher County Rural Yes 111.6 (68.6, 176.3) 237 (19, 241) 4 falling falling trend -6.4 (-32.8, -2.4)
Armstrong County Urban No 149.9 (91.8, 237.5) 167 (1, 241) 4
*
*
Dickens County Rural No 163.0 (100.2, 257.7) 124 (1, 241) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.4, 1.4)
Hemphill County Rural Yes 120.6 (75.6, 183.4) 229 (11, 241) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.4)
Edwards County Rural No 205.3 (128.7, 320.3) 12 (1, 241) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.6, 4.6)
Reagan County Rural No 194.3 (119.9, 294.5) 27 (1, 241) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.4, 3.2)
Menard County Rural No 123.7 (75.5, 200.9) 224 (5, 241) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.2, 1.7)
Shackelford County Rural No 124.7 (79.5, 188.1) 220 (7, 241) 5 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.5, -1.8)
Lipscomb County Rural No 144.8 (95.7, 212.3) 180 (4, 241) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 1.8)
Cochran County Urban No 193.6 (131.0, 277.4) 32 (1, 240) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 0.5)
Collingsworth County Rural No 185.8 (124.6, 268.8) 56 (1, 240) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.3)
Hudspeth County Urban No 246.0 (166.8, 349.7) 3 (1, 234) 6
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural No 122.7 (81.0, 238.6) 225 (1, 241) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.8, 2.8)
Hall County Rural No 135.9 (95.0, 193.9) 209 (7, 241) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.1)
Hartley County Rural Yes 118.6 (84.3, 163.1) 231 (43, 241) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Concho County Rural No 158.7 (113.1, 220.5) 141 (2, 241) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.8)
Crane County Rural No 180.5 (128.2, 246.6) 64 (1, 238) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Donley County Rural No 139.8 (96.8, 199.0) 200 (5, 241) 8 falling falling trend -9.7 (-31.9, -1.0)
Presidio County Rural Yes 81.4 (55.8, 115.6) 241 (207, 241) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.4)
Hardeman County Rural No 144.7 (102.5, 201.0) 181 (6, 241) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 1.9)
Sutton County Rural No 168.0 (119.5, 232.1) 104 (2, 241) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 0.9)
Bailey County Rural No 124.3 (90.6, 166.5) 221 (47, 241) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.4)
Garza County Urban No 178.8 (130.3, 239.7) 67 (2, 238) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Martin County Urban No 187.6 (136.4, 251.7) 48 (1, 237) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.6)
Crockett County Rural No 234.5 (171.2, 315.5) 5 (1, 213) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.3)
Dallam County Rural No 154.5 (113.0, 205.8) 158 (6, 240) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.4)
Kinney County Rural No 173.7 (124.7, 238.9) 87 (2, 240) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.4)
Knox County Rural No 194.2 (141.9, 261.7) 28 (1, 236) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 2.8)
Winkler County Rural No 134.0 (99.7, 176.4) 214 (24, 241) 10 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.6, 0.0)
Ochiltree County Rural Yes 110.8 (82.7, 145.3) 238 (106, 241) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.8)
Crosby County Urban No 156.4 (117.3, 205.6) 150 (6, 240) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.6)
Yoakum County Rural No 151.8 (113.7, 198.5) 161 (7, 239) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 4.1)
Jim Hogg County Rural No 199.0 (148.8, 261.2) 17 (1, 228) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.7)
La Salle County Rural No 152.7 (115.4, 198.7) 160 (6, 239) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Lynn County Urban No 163.1 (122.8, 213.1) 123 (4, 239) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.3)
Hansford County Rural No 195.3 (148.3, 253.1) 26 (1, 227) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.7, 3.7)
Kimble County Rural No 156.9 (115.1, 211.1) 148 (5, 240) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.0)
Castro County Rural No 139.9 (105.5, 182.1) 199 (14, 241) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.6)
Fisher County Rural No 213.0 (159.9, 280.5) 8 (1, 222) 12 stable stable trend 12.8 (-1.7, 33.0)
Coke County Rural No 209.3 (157.3, 276.3) 10 (1, 219) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Floyd County Rural No 174.7 (133.4, 225.8) 84 (3, 238) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.0)
Real County Rural No 241.5 (182.8, 318.5) 4 (1, 181) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.7)
Wheeler County Rural No 186.7 (144.4, 239.3) 51 (2, 232) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Carson County Urban No 172.9 (134.2, 220.5) 91 (3, 236) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 1.9)
Mason County Rural No 188.4 (142.0, 248.1) 45 (1, 236) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Baylor County Rural No 254.5 (196.4, 326.8) 2 (1, 138) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 1.8)
Brooks County Rural No 177.5 (138.8, 224.0) 73 (4, 234) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.7)
Delta County Rural No 175.2 (137.4, 222.0) 80 (3, 235) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.2)
Haskell County Rural No 171.4 (133.6, 218.3) 95 (5, 237) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 1.8)
Mills County Rural No 176.0 (135.6, 227.7) 77 (4, 231) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.6)
Brewster County Rural Yes 104.1 (81.1, 132.6) 240 (160, 241) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
San Saba County Rural No 167.5 (132.2, 211.3) 109 (5, 234) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Parmer County Rural No 143.6 (113.3, 179.7) 189 (19, 239) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.1)
Childress County Rural No 197.9 (156.6, 247.6) 20 (1, 217) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.7)
Archer County Urban Yes 122.5 (96.8, 154.0) 226 (81, 241) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Swisher County Rural No 186.1 (147.7, 232.1) 54 (2, 219) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 1.9)
Mitchell County Rural No 177.3 (141.3, 219.8) 75 (4, 230) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.6)
Goliad County Urban No 138.7 (110.2, 173.8) 203 (38, 239) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Zapata County Rural No 129.1 (103.3, 159.4) 217 (67, 241) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 3.0)
Ward County Rural No 158.9 (127.7, 195.5) 140 (12, 236) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Zavala County Rural No 199.0 (160.9, 243.4) 18 (1, 209) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Duval County Rural No 161.3 (130.3, 197.8) 132 (7, 237) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Jack County Rural No 180.9 (146.5, 221.4) 63 (3, 224) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Somervell County Rural No 145.8 (117.9, 179.1) 176 (24, 239) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.6)
Dimmit County Rural No 200.0 (162.7, 243.7) 15 (1, 217) 20 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 2.9)
Refugio County Rural No 187.1 (152.2, 229.2) 49 (2, 216) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Dawson County Rural No 158.4 (129.6, 192.0) 142 (13, 236) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Reeves County Rural No 175.9 (144.1, 212.5) 78 (5, 225) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Pecos County Rural No 151.1 (124.2, 182.1) 164 (27, 236) 22 stable stable trend 4.6 (-0.4, 17.1)
Terry County Rural No 172.1 (141.5, 207.6) 93 (7, 226) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.7)
Stephens County Rural No 169.6 (139.3, 205.2) 101 (7, 232) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Gaines County Rural No 145.6 (119.7, 175.1) 178 (30, 238) 23 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.2)
Andrews County Rural No 160.3 (132.2, 192.5) 134 (14, 234) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Live Oak County Rural No 147.1 (121.3, 177.3) 175 (28, 238) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
McCulloch County Rural No 191.9 (158.0, 232.2) 35 (2, 200) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Karnes County Rural No 163.1 (136.1, 194.1) 122 (14, 230) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Lamb County Rural No 156.0 (130.2, 185.7) 152 (18, 233) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Deaf Smith County Rural No 151.2 (126.3, 179.5) 163 (32, 234) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Frio County Rural No 162.4 (135.8, 192.6) 126 (15, 230) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.4)
Franklin County Rural No 166.7 (138.5, 199.5) 112 (9, 227) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 4.6)
Moore County Rural No 141.1 (117.9, 167.5) 195 (51, 238) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Willacy County Rural No 126.9 (106.6, 150.0) 218 (119, 240) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Clay County Urban No 167.5 (139.8, 200.0) 110 (9, 225) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Wilbarger County Rural No 165.4 (138.8, 196.0) 116 (14, 224) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.2)
Madison County Rural No 185.9 (156.4, 219.5) 55 (4, 196) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
San Augustine County Rural No 194.1 (162.1, 231.9) 29 (3, 188) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Marion County Rural No 157.6 (132.4, 187.7) 145 (18, 231) 30 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.0)
Runnels County Rural No 197.7 (166.6, 233.6) 22 (3, 180) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Camp County Rural No 184.4 (155.2, 217.7) 59 (4, 206) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Scurry County Rural No 159.0 (134.6, 186.6) 139 (20, 229) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Comanche County Rural No 142.7 (119.7, 169.4) 190 (49, 237) 31 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -1.0)
Coleman County Rural No 223.8 (188.5, 265.2) 6 (1, 146) 31 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Hamilton County Rural No 211.4 (177.5, 250.9) 9 (1, 156) 31 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0)
Blanco County Rural No 149.9 (126.8, 177.0) 169 (35, 234) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 1.0)
Jackson County Rural No 149.1 (126.7, 174.6) 171 (42, 235) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Sabine County Rural No 161.7 (136.1, 192.0) 128 (15, 223) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Callahan County Urban No 168.9 (144.1, 197.1) 102 (8, 217) 35 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Newton County Rural No 196.0 (166.6, 229.6) 25 (3, 171) 36 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.9, 11.4)
Morris County Rural No 196.4 (168.9, 227.9) 24 (3, 156) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Jones County Urban No 165.7 (142.9, 191.4) 114 (16, 220) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Rains County Rural No 178.4 (152.6, 208.0) 70 (8, 200) 38 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Nolan County Rural No 190.6 (164.3, 220.3) 38 (3, 174) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Lee County Rural No 151.1 (130.0, 174.9) 165 (44, 231) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Falls County Urban No 161.9 (139.7, 187.0) 127 (18, 220) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Gonzales County Rural No 159.3 (137.8, 183.5) 137 (30, 224) 40 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Red River County Rural No 204.8 (176.1, 237.5) 13 (2, 136) 41 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Hutchinson County Rural No 158.4 (137.0, 182.3) 143 (29, 224) 41 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Hockley County Urban No 175.2 (152.3, 200.8) 81 (12, 201) 43 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.0)
Gray County Rural No 172.7 (150.7, 197.3) 92 (14, 205) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Robertson County Urban No 188.3 (164.1, 215.5) 46 (5, 165) 46 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Burleson County Urban No 173.9 (151.7, 198.8) 86 (13, 205) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Leon County Rural No 189.8 (165.6, 217.0) 40 (6, 163) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Bee County Rural No 164.3 (144.4, 186.2) 118 (23, 210) 50 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.4)
DeWitt County Rural No 167.6 (147.1, 190.5) 108 (20, 208) 50 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Hale County Rural No 144.3 (126.8, 163.5) 185 (74, 233) 50 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Calhoun County Rural No 186.5 (164.0, 211.6) 52 (6, 167) 51 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Eastland County Rural No 187.0 (164.1, 212.6) 50 (6, 171) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Tyler County Rural No 167.9 (147.4, 190.9) 105 (18, 208) 52 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Trinity County Rural No 206.8 (181.0, 236.0) 11 (3, 124) 52 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Kleberg County Rural No 173.4 (152.9, 195.9) 89 (13, 190) 53 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Young County Rural No 204.1 (179.6, 231.2) 14 (3, 127) 53 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Limestone County Rural No 162.8 (143.3, 184.5) 125 (32, 213) 53 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Uvalde County Rural No 178.5 (157.6, 201.6) 68 (10, 183) 54 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Freestone County Rural No 189.8 (167.5, 214.6) 39 (7, 166) 55 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Houston County Rural No 153.3 (135.5, 173.3) 159 (51, 222) 55 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Colorado County Rural No 173.4 (152.8, 196.3) 88 (15, 203) 56 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Montague County Rural No 169.7 (150.0, 191.6) 100 (20, 202) 56 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Titus County Rural No 163.4 (144.6, 184.0) 121 (29, 214) 56 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Lavaca County Rural No 169.8 (150.1, 191.7) 99 (19, 202) 58 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Lampasas County Urban No 188.8 (167.6, 212.2) 43 (7, 163) 61 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Panola County Rural No 189.2 (168.0, 212.6) 42 (8, 157) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Howard County Rural No 175.6 (156.1, 196.9) 79 (13, 192) 61 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Bandera County Urban No 147.3 (130.6, 166.3) 173 (70, 228) 63 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.0, 0.0)
Shelby County Rural No 197.7 (176.1, 221.3) 23 (4, 136) 63 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Fayette County Rural No 139.0 (123.1, 156.6) 202 (100, 233) 63 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Austin County Urban No 142.5 (126.8, 159.7) 191 (84, 231) 64 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Grimes County Rural No 155.3 (138.4, 173.9) 154 (48, 221) 65 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Bosque County Urban No 199.5 (177.4, 224.1) 16 (5, 123) 65 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Erath County Rural No 140.3 (125.2, 156.8) 196 (105, 231) 65 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Milam County Rural No 167.7 (149.5, 187.8) 107 (20, 200) 65 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Gillespie County Rural Yes 121.7 (108.2, 136.8) 227 (172, 239) 70 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Maverick County Urban No 135.0 (121.1, 150.1) 210 (130, 233) 70 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Chambers County Urban No 157.6 (141.1, 175.5) 146 (51, 216) 71 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.5)
Val Verde County Rural No 143.9 (129.4, 159.6) 186 (91, 228) 72 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Starr County Rural No 134.2 (121.0, 148.3) 212 (125, 234) 77 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Llano County Rural No 154.8 (137.3, 174.5) 156 (44, 220) 78 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Aransas County Urban No 174.9 (156.8, 195.0) 82 (13, 181) 80 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
San Jacinto County Urban No 182.8 (164.3, 203.0) 60 (11, 166) 80 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Washington County Rural No 140.3 (126.4, 155.6) 197 (107, 231) 80 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 199.0 (179.5, 220.2) 19 (5, 122) 82 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.9, 11.6)
Jim Wells County Rural No 180.9 (163.6, 199.6) 62 (11, 158) 83 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 5.5)
Wharton County Rural No 149.9 (135.6, 165.5) 168 (78, 223) 83 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Matagorda County Rural No 178.2 (161.1, 196.7) 71 (15, 163) 83 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Waller County Urban No 159.7 (144.2, 176.3) 136 (48, 208) 83 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Hopkins County Rural No 168.1 (152.2, 185.3) 103 (32, 193) 85 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Kendall County Urban No 124.1 (112.3, 136.9) 223 (172, 238) 85 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Caldwell County Urban No 159.2 (144.3, 175.3) 138 (50, 206) 86 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Atascosa County Urban No 156.9 (142.4, 172.6) 147 (55, 211) 87 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Cass County Rural No 194.0 (175.7, 214.0) 30 (7, 128) 88 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Fannin County Rural No 178.5 (161.9, 196.4) 69 (15, 162) 88 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Brown County Rural No 161.5 (146.7, 177.6) 129 (47, 199) 92 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Jasper County Rural No 197.8 (179.5, 217.6) 21 (6, 105) 93 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Cooke County Rural No 165.4 (150.6, 181.5) 115 (39, 195) 96 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Medina County Urban No 142.4 (129.7, 156.1) 192 (107, 225) 96 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Wilson County Urban No 149.6 (136.2, 164.0) 170 (78, 218) 97 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Hill County Rural No 189.6 (173.1, 207.5) 41 (9, 123) 102 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Upshur County Urban No 187.7 (171.7, 205.0) 47 (10, 131) 106 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 2.5)
Cherokee County Rural No 163.4 (149.8, 178.0) 120 (49, 191) 110 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Navarro County Rural No 171.1 (156.8, 186.3) 96 (26, 167) 111 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.6)
Walker County Rural No 145.1 (133.4, 157.7) 179 (110, 220) 117 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Rusk County Urban No 179.0 (164.6, 194.4) 66 (20, 151) 119 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.1, 6.6)
Hardin County Urban No 164.9 (151.7, 178.9) 117 (47, 185) 120 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.1)
Burnet County Rural No 147.2 (135.4, 160.0) 174 (102, 217) 123 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Nacogdoches County Rural No 173.4 (159.8, 187.8) 90 (30, 161) 127 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Coryell County Urban No 181.7 (167.7, 196.6) 61 (16, 141) 128 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Harrison County Urban No 148.1 (136.7, 160.1) 172 (96, 217) 132 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
San Patricio County Urban No 167.8 (155.1, 181.4) 106 (41, 176) 133 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Lamar County Rural No 191.2 (176.6, 206.8) 36 (12, 111) 133 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Wise County Urban No 174.5 (161.6, 188.2) 85 (32, 158) 145 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.2)
Anderson County Rural No 215.4 (199.8, 232.0) 7 (3, 49) 146 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 3.2)
Van Zandt County Rural No 166.9 (154.8, 179.8) 111 (49, 171) 149 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Polk County Rural No 265.7 (244.3, 288.5) 1 (1, 10) 151 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.4, 9.3)
Rockwall County Urban No 138.3 (128.4, 148.7) 205 (143, 227) 154 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.8)
Kerr County Rural No 151.5 (140.2, 163.7) 162 (91, 214) 156 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Wood County Rural No 186.2 (172.6, 200.9) 53 (15, 119) 157 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.7, 11.0)
Hood County Rural No 144.6 (134.1, 155.7) 182 (119, 219) 159 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.9)
Bastrop County Urban No 141.2 (131.3, 151.6) 194 (127, 220) 164 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Victoria County Urban No 154.6 (144.3, 165.5) 157 (85, 199) 174 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.0)
Angelina County Rural No 166.0 (155.0, 177.6) 113 (52, 173) 175 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.6, 8.5)
Liberty County Urban No 192.3 (179.3, 205.9) 34 (11, 102) 177 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Orange County Urban No 177.9 (166.3, 190.1) 72 (26, 139) 183 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Midland County Urban No 138.3 (129.7, 147.3) 206 (148, 222) 205 falling falling trend -2.3 (-6.3, -0.6)
Tom Green County Urban No 143.7 (135.0, 153.0) 187 (130, 216) 207 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Potter County Urban No 169.9 (159.7, 180.5) 98 (47, 153) 214 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Bowie County Urban No 185.6 (174.6, 197.2) 57 (20, 114) 219 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 3.8)
Hunt County Urban No 177.4 (166.9, 188.5) 74 (28, 132) 221 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.4, -0.8)
Brazos County Urban No 131.2 (123.6, 139.1) 216 (173, 227) 231 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Randall County Urban No 144.4 (136.1, 153.1) 183 (128, 215) 235 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Kaufman County Urban No 174.7 (164.5, 185.3) 83 (35, 139) 240 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 2.0)
Ector County Urban No 191.1 (180.3, 202.4) 37 (13, 95) 246 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.4, 6.2)
Gregg County Urban No 170.4 (161.0, 180.3) 97 (45, 150) 252 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Henderson County Rural No 193.9 (182.9, 205.4) 31 (13, 82) 253 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Taylor County Urban No 161.0 (152.1, 170.2) 133 (71, 175) 257 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Guadalupe County Urban No 141.7 (134.2, 149.5) 193 (142, 218) 278 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Wichita County Urban No 188.6 (178.6, 199.0) 44 (17, 98) 279 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 3.7)
Hays County Urban No 134.0 (126.9, 141.3) 213 (168, 224) 295 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Webb County Urban No 136.4 (129.4, 143.6) 208 (163, 224) 296 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Parker County Urban No 164.2 (155.8, 172.9) 119 (64, 162) 303 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Comal County Urban No 140.3 (133.2, 147.6) 198 (152, 218) 319 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Ellis County Urban No 161.4 (153.3, 169.7) 131 (81, 175) 322 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 2.0)
Grayson County Urban No 179.7 (170.9, 188.9) 65 (31, 118) 327 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Johnson County Urban No 171.4 (163.1, 179.9) 94 (50, 141) 342 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Smith County Urban No 150.0 (143.7, 156.4) 166 (127, 193) 446 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.6, 1.2)
McLennan County Urban No 155.7 (149.4, 162.3) 153 (106, 177) 464 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.9)
Jefferson County Urban No 156.6 (150.2, 163.2) 149 (100, 176) 466 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Lubbock County Urban No 159.8 (153.5, 166.3) 135 (92, 168) 495 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Bell County Urban No 154.8 (148.8, 160.9) 155 (109, 181) 527 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Cameron County Urban No 126.8 (122.1, 131.6) 219 (200, 229) 562 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.4, 5.7)
Nueces County Urban No 136.4 (131.4, 141.7) 207 (171, 220) 563 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Brazoria County Urban No 156.2 (150.4, 162.2) 151 (105, 175) 577 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.5, 1.1)
Galveston County Urban No 161.5 (155.9, 167.3) 130 (86, 160) 662 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Williamson County Urban Yes 121.3 (117.4, 125.4) 228 (211, 233) 754 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Fort Bend County Urban Yes 117.1 (113.6, 120.8) 232 (215, 237) 911 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -0.6)
Hidalgo County Urban Yes 115.3 (112.0, 118.8) 234 (219, 238) 913 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Montgomery County Urban No 139.8 (135.7, 144.0) 201 (167, 213) 932 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Denton County Urban Yes 119.4 (115.9, 122.9) 230 (213, 236) 989 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.7)
El Paso County Urban No 131.7 (128.3, 135.2) 215 (191, 222) 1,129 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.7)
Collin County Urban Yes 115.2 (112.2, 118.4) 235 (220, 238) 1,139 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Travis County Urban Yes 115.8 (112.8, 118.8) 233 (219, 238) 1,262 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Bexar County Urban No 138.4 (136.0, 140.8) 204 (177, 210) 2,734 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Tarrant County Urban No 144.3 (141.9, 146.7) 184 (158, 196) 2,889 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Dallas County Urban No 143.7 (141.5, 145.9) 188 (160, 196) 3,390 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Harris County Urban No 134.5 (132.9, 136.1) 211 (191, 217) 5,720 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 12:34 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top