Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A No 159.1 (157.7, 160.5) N/A 10,409 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Autauga County Urban No 153.8 (141.2, 167.2) 54 (20, 66) 114 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Baldwin County Urban No 143.9 (138.2, 149.8) 62 (50, 66) 515 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Barbour County Rural No 178.9 (159.3, 200.4) 17 (1, 58) 64 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.7, 6.0)
Bibb County Urban No 166.2 (145.8, 189.0) 36 (3, 65) 49 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Blount County Urban No 166.3 (153.8, 179.7) 35 (9, 58) 135 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Bullock County Rural No 149.7 (121.9, 182.6) 59 (3, 67) 21 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Butler County Rural No 169.5 (147.9, 193.8) 27 (2, 65) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Calhoun County Urban No 176.8 (167.3, 186.9) 19 (5, 41) 270 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Chambers County Rural No 169.5 (153.3, 187.0) 28 (4, 60) 85 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Cherokee County Rural No 183.5 (164.7, 204.2) 7 (1, 53) 76 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Chilton County Urban No 181.1 (165.5, 197.9) 11 (1, 50) 103 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Choctaw County Rural No 156.9 (133.8, 183.6) 52 (4, 66) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Clarke County Rural No 203.6 (182.2, 227.2) 2 (1, 29) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Clay County Rural No 169.8 (145.9, 197.1) 26 (1, 65) 37 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Cleburne County Rural No 189.7 (164.4, 218.2) 5 (1, 54) 42 stable stable trend 10.3 (-0.8, 19.0)
Coffee County Rural No 150.7 (137.8, 164.5) 58 (24, 66) 103 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Colbert County Urban No 164.4 (152.1, 177.5) 38 (10, 61) 139 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Conecuh County Rural No 166.5 (140.0, 197.2) 34 (2, 66) 31 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Coosa County Rural No 159.0 (132.7, 190.1) 47 (2, 66) 28 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Covington County Rural No 180.7 (165.3, 197.3) 12 (2, 49) 108 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.4)
Crenshaw County Rural No 204.7 (175.9, 237.2) 1 (1, 43) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Cullman County Rural No 152.2 (142.4, 162.6) 57 (30, 65) 188 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Dale County Rural No 163.1 (149.3, 178.0) 40 (10, 62) 107 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Dallas County Rural No 156.4 (140.9, 173.3) 53 (13, 66) 81 falling falling trend -11.2 (-18.1, -3.9)
DeKalb County Rural No 157.3 (145.9, 169.4) 49 (19, 64) 147 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Elmore County Urban No 167.2 (156.2, 178.7) 33 (9, 56) 182 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Escambia County Rural No 194.7 (177.4, 213.4) 4 (1, 30) 97 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Etowah County Urban No 183.0 (173.0, 193.4) 9 (2, 33) 266 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Fayette County Rural No 171.3 (148.0, 197.6) 23 (1, 65) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Franklin County Rural No 179.3 (161.2, 199.1) 14 (1, 56) 73 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Geneva County Urban No 172.3 (153.9, 192.5) 22 (3, 60) 67 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Greene County Urban No 181.7 (146.6, 223.6) 10 (1, 66) 21 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 11.6)
Hale County Urban No 179.0 (153.4, 208.1) 16 (1, 62) 37 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.5)
Henry County Urban No 165.0 (143.9, 188.9) 37 (3, 66) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Houston County Urban No 159.9 (150.6, 169.7) 45 (20, 60) 228 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Jackson County Rural No 183.7 (170.1, 198.2) 6 (1, 40) 144 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Jefferson County Urban No 160.2 (156.2, 164.2) 44 (30, 54) 1,311 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Lamar County Rural No 170.3 (146.1, 198.0) 25 (1, 65) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Lauderdale County Urban No 145.1 (135.9, 154.8) 61 (42, 66) 198 stable stable trend -2.7 (-4.8, 0.9)
Lawrence County Urban No 179.2 (162.1, 197.9) 15 (1, 54) 84 stable stable trend -0.8 (-9.3, 4.9)
Lee County Urban No 159.1 (150.6, 168.0) 46 (22, 60) 274 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.7)
Limestone County Urban No 140.0 (130.8, 149.6) 65 (50, 66) 182 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -1.3)
Lowndes County Urban No 169.0 (140.0, 203.0) 29 (1, 66) 25 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Macon County Urban No 168.8 (146.6, 193.8) 30 (1, 65) 45 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Madison County Urban No 142.1 (137.3, 147.2) 63 (53, 66) 667 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Marengo County Rural No 146.1 (126.4, 168.4) 60 (15, 67) 41 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Marion County Rural No 179.9 (162.7, 198.7) 13 (1, 54) 82 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Marshall County Rural No 167.3 (157.0, 178.1) 32 (11, 55) 207 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Mobile County Urban No 167.7 (162.7, 172.9) 31 (18, 45) 872 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Monroe County Rural No 158.6 (138.1, 181.5) 48 (5, 66) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Montgomery County Urban No 162.3 (155.4, 169.4) 41 (22, 55) 438 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Morgan County Urban No 152.8 (144.3, 161.7) 56 (32, 64) 252 falling falling trend -6.4 (-10.0, -1.8)
Perry County Rural No 140.2 (110.9, 175.7) 64 (7, 67) 17 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.6)
Pickens County Urban No 176.3 (154.4, 200.9) 20 (1, 62) 48 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Pike County Rural No 178.0 (158.9, 198.9) 18 (1, 57) 66 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Randolph County Rural No 157.3 (138.4, 178.3) 50 (7, 66) 54 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Russell County Urban No 200.7 (185.5, 216.8) 3 (1, 20) 136 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Shelby County Urban Yes 118.0 (112.2, 124.0) 67 (65, 67) 326 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
St. Clair County Urban No 161.6 (151.5, 172.3) 42 (16, 59) 198 falling falling trend -1.9 (-5.2, -1.3)
Sumter County Rural No 157.1 (128.4, 190.6) 51 (1, 67) 24 falling falling trend -14.7 (-26.8, -1.1)
Talladega County Rural No 175.7 (164.6, 187.4) 21 (4, 47) 198 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Tallapoosa County Rural No 164.3 (150.0, 179.8) 39 (8, 62) 107 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Tuscaloosa County Urban No 135.8 (129.2, 142.8) 66 (57, 66) 328 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.0)
Walker County Urban No 183.4 (170.9, 196.7) 8 (2, 38) 168 falling falling trend -3.3 (-8.2, -1.4)
Washington County Rural No 153.6 (130.9, 179.6) 55 (6, 67) 34 falling falling trend -6.1 (-16.6, -1.9)
Wilcox County Rural No 170.9 (141.1, 205.7) 24 (1, 66) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Winston County Rural No 161.1 (142.8, 181.4) 43 (6, 66) 60 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 6:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top