Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A No 174.3 (172.6, 176.0) N/A 8,341 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Adair County Rural No 212.2 (186.4, 240.8) 17 (1, 51) 50 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Alfalfa County Rural No 184.1 (144.7, 232.6) 36 (1, 77) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 2.9)
Atoka County Rural No 180.3 (154.2, 209.9) 39 (6, 74) 35 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Beaver County Rural No 136.3 (101.2, 181.3) 76 (27, 77) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.4)
Beckham County Rural No 187.5 (164.0, 213.4) 33 (6, 68) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Blaine County Rural No 224.0 (187.4, 266.4) 8 (1, 58) 28 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 10.9)
Bryan County Rural No 179.9 (164.7, 196.2) 41 (18, 63) 107 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Caddo County Rural No 226.6 (203.5, 251.8) 7 (1, 35) 71 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Canadian County Urban No 148.3 (139.9, 157.1) 69 (55, 76) 243 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.4)
Carter County Rural No 202.3 (186.3, 219.4) 24 (5, 45) 123 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Cherokee County Rural No 194.2 (178.5, 210.9) 28 (9, 53) 119 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Choctaw County Rural No 188.3 (162.4, 217.6) 32 (4, 70) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-7.1, -0.2)
Cimarron County Rural No 133.9 (83.8, 208.0) 77 (4, 77) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.8, 2.9)
Cleveland County Urban No 145.1 (139.2, 151.2) 72 (61, 76) 467 falling falling trend -2.0 (-6.7, -0.8)
Coal County Rural No 221.8 (176.8, 276.3) 9 (1, 69) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 1.9)
Comanche County Urban No 173.0 (162.6, 183.8) 48 (30, 65) 216 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Cotton County Urban No 196.1 (155.2, 246.0) 26 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.2)
Craig County Rural No 173.6 (148.5, 202.2) 47 (11, 75) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Creek County Urban No 185.7 (173.6, 198.4) 34 (18, 56) 185 falling falling trend -7.4 (-10.8, -4.2)
Custer County Rural No 168.2 (148.0, 190.5) 51 (21, 74) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Delaware County Rural No 158.6 (145.1, 173.3) 64 (37, 75) 112 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Dewey County Rural No 180.2 (134.7, 237.4) 40 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 8.2)
Ellis County Rural No 146.0 (103.1, 202.9) 71 (8, 77) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.0)
Garfield County Urban No 174.4 (161.1, 188.5) 45 (26, 66) 134 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Garvin County Rural No 212.3 (190.4, 236.2) 16 (1, 46) 71 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Grady County Urban No 168.4 (154.8, 182.9) 50 (30, 71) 119 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Grant County Rural No 231.0 (177.1, 297.6) 2 (1, 69) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 2.9)
Greer County Rural No 166.0 (126.7, 214.6) 54 (4, 77) 12 falling falling trend -15.1 (-26.9, -1.5)
Harmon County Rural No 162.5 (105.0, 242.6) 59 (1, 77) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 0.4)
Harper County Rural No 140.7 (97.2, 200.1) 75 (7, 77) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.7, -0.1)
Haskell County Rural No 205.4 (175.7, 239.3) 21 (1, 64) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Hughes County Rural No 209.9 (180.8, 242.7) 18 (1, 58) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Jackson County Rural No 165.1 (144.5, 187.9) 56 (23, 76) 47 falling falling trend -2.7 (-11.1, -0.7)
Jefferson County Rural No 229.4 (182.4, 286.1) 5 (1, 66) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Johnston County Rural No 199.4 (166.4, 237.4) 25 (1, 70) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Kay County Rural No 195.2 (179.5, 212.0) 27 (8, 52) 119 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Kingfisher County Rural No 159.4 (134.6, 187.6) 62 (22, 77) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Kiowa County Rural No 230.8 (193.0, 274.5) 3 (1, 52) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Latimer County Rural No 166.8 (138.7, 199.8) 53 (13, 77) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Le Flore County Rural No 202.8 (187.1, 219.5) 23 (5, 43) 129 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Lincoln County Urban No 183.6 (166.5, 202.1) 37 (15, 65) 88 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Logan County Urban No 146.4 (133.1, 160.8) 70 (50, 77) 93 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Love County Rural No 212.5 (178.7, 251.3) 15 (1, 62) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Major County Rural No 143.6 (113.3, 180.5) 73 (22, 77) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Marshall County Rural No 190.7 (166.8, 217.6) 30 (4, 66) 48 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Mayes County Rural No 192.0 (175.2, 210.2) 29 (10, 56) 101 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
McClain County Urban No 163.9 (148.0, 181.2) 58 (30, 75) 81 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.4)
McCurtain County Rural No 216.9 (196.5, 239.1) 11 (1, 37) 86 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
McIntosh County Rural No 188.9 (168.2, 212.0) 31 (7, 66) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Murray County Rural No 177.2 (151.8, 206.1) 44 (9, 74) 36 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.4)
Muskogee County Rural No 207.3 (193.6, 221.9) 19 (5, 37) 175 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Noble County Rural No 164.3 (137.7, 195.3) 57 (16, 77) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Nowata County Rural No 227.0 (191.4, 268.0) 6 (1, 53) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Okfuskee County Rural No 249.4 (214.5, 288.7) 1 (1, 33) 38 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.3)
Oklahoma County Urban No 172.9 (168.8, 176.9) 49 (38, 57) 1,466 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Okmulgee County Urban No 214.3 (196.1, 233.9) 13 (2, 37) 106 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Osage County Urban No 157.0 (143.7, 171.4) 65 (40, 76) 108 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Ottawa County Rural No 214.9 (194.6, 236.8) 12 (1, 41) 85 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Pawnee County Urban No 177.2 (153.1, 204.5) 43 (10, 73) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Payne County Rural No 177.5 (164.3, 191.5) 42 (24, 63) 139 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Pittsburg County Rural No 204.8 (189.0, 221.6) 22 (4, 42) 130 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Pontotoc County Rural No 159.0 (143.3, 176.0) 63 (35, 75) 78 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Pottawatomie County Rural No 206.5 (193.2, 220.6) 20 (6, 38) 186 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Pushmataha County Rural No 213.5 (183.3, 248.0) 14 (1, 54) 38 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Roger Mills County Rural No 159.7 (114.6, 219.5) 61 (3, 77) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.7)
Rogers County Urban No 167.1 (156.8, 177.9) 52 (35, 68) 206 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Seminole County Rural No 217.9 (195.3, 242.7) 10 (1, 39) 70 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Sequoyah County Urban No 229.9 (211.8, 249.3) 4 (1, 23) 124 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Stephens County Rural No 184.7 (169.6, 200.9) 35 (15, 61) 118 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Texas County Rural No 165.6 (140.4, 193.8) 55 (15, 77) 32 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1)
Tillman County Rural No 180.3 (144.9, 222.9) 38 (2, 76) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 5.3)
Tulsa County Urban No 160.4 (156.3, 164.6) 60 (50, 68) 1,203 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Wagoner County Urban No 152.1 (141.5, 163.3) 68 (48, 76) 161 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Washington County Rural No 174.1 (160.7, 188.4) 46 (26, 67) 132 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Washita County Rural No 142.6 (115.9, 174.1) 74 (33, 77) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Woods County Rural No 152.3 (120.9, 189.8) 67 (15, 77) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2)
Woodward County Rural No 152.3 (131.2, 175.9) 66 (32, 77) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 12:01 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top