Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota N/A No 151.1 (147.8, 154.4) N/A 1,733 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Campbell County Rural Yes 102.7 (59.6, 187.4) 63 (12, 63) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.1, 3.5)
McPherson County Rural Yes 113.7 (74.0, 174.7) 62 (12, 63) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.1, 1.2)
Lincoln County Urban Yes 115.5 (104.4, 127.4) 61 (41, 63) 83 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 3.1)
Edmunds County Rural Yes 117.9 (84.7, 163.0) 60 (17, 63) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.0)
Davison County Rural Yes 118.5 (101.1, 138.3) 59 (32, 63) 35 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
Douglas County Rural Yes 118.9 (76.7, 179.9) 58 (11, 63) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.4)
Spink County Rural Yes 120.2 (91.0, 157.3) 57 (19, 63) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Deuel County Rural Yes 120.3 (86.7, 165.3) 56 (14, 63) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.6)
Yankton County Rural No 122.7 (106.7, 140.8) 55 (30, 63) 44 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Charles Mix County Rural No 123.1 (95.6, 156.4) 54 (19, 63) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.5)
Clark County Rural No 126.5 (88.5, 178.0) 53 (10, 63) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.2)
Lawrence County Rural No 126.9 (111.5, 144.1) 52 (29, 62) 53 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.8, -1.5)
Lake County Rural No 127.2 (101.8, 157.5) 51 (19, 63) 20 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.2)
Brule County Rural No 129.7 (94.4, 175.1) 50 (12, 63) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.7, -0.3)
Day County Rural No 130.1 (100.1, 168.9) 49 (15, 63) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.3)
Tripp County Rural No 130.5 (98.5, 171.2) 48 (14, 63) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -1.0)
Sanborn County Rural No 131.0 (81.5, 203.5) 47 (5, 63) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.7, 0.8)
Moody County Rural No 132.3 (100.3, 172.4) 46 (12, 63) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Marshall County Rural No 132.6 (96.9, 179.6) 45 (10, 63) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.5)
Walworth County Rural No 132.9 (100.7, 174.0) 44 (12, 63) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.2)
Brown County Rural No 134.9 (120.6, 150.5) 43 (24, 59) 68 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Custer County Urban No 135.0 (110.7, 165.2) 42 (16, 62) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Potter County Rural No 136.4 (89.7, 204.8) 41 (6, 63) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.3, 1.7)
Brookings County Rural No 137.6 (120.2, 156.8) 40 (20, 60) 47 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Bon Homme County Rural No 139.3 (108.8, 176.8) 39 (12, 63) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.0)
Stanley County Rural No 139.4 (96.1, 199.2) 38 (7, 63) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -0.8)
Roberts County Rural No 142.5 (115.5, 174.6) 37 (13, 62) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.7)
Codington County Rural No 142.9 (126.7, 160.8) 36 (19, 56) 59 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Miner County Rural No 143.7 (91.0, 220.4) 35 (4, 63) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 3.2)
Sully County Rural No 144.1 (76.5, 252.9) 34 (2, 63) 3 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.5, 3.1)
Kingsbury County Rural No 145.3 (110.2, 189.8) 33 (9, 63) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.2)
Gregory County Rural No 145.8 (105.9, 198.4) 32 (6, 63) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.0)
Perkins County Rural No 148.3 (103.6, 210.7) 31 (5, 63) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.6, 2.6)
Meade County Urban No 149.9 (132.1, 169.6) 30 (15, 53) 54 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Turner County Urban No 152.0 (123.5, 186.1) 29 (10, 60) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Clay County Rural No 153.3 (125.0, 186.2) 28 (10, 58) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Pennington County Urban No 154.0 (144.8, 163.6) 27 (18, 41) 228 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Union County Urban No 154.9 (132.2, 180.5) 26 (11, 54) 35 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Beadle County Rural No 158.0 (136.3, 182.3) 25 (11, 51) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Aurora County Rural No 162.6 (111.8, 231.7) 24 (3, 63) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.5, 4.7)
Hand County Rural No 164.0 (115.8, 228.7) 23 (3, 63) 9 stable stable trend 27.8 (-0.4, 51.0)
Bennett County Rural No 167.7 (111.6, 242.3) 22 (2, 63) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.3)
Haakon County Rural No 168.3 (109.7, 254.8) 21 (2, 63) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.2, 17.2)
Hutchinson County Rural No 169.3 (137.6, 207.3) 20 (6, 54) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 1.8)
Hughes County Rural No 169.3 (146.0, 195.5) 19 (8, 46) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Grant County Rural No 169.9 (139.0, 207.0) 18 (6, 55) 22 stable stable trend 11.6 (-0.3, 25.4)
Butte County Rural No 170.9 (141.8, 204.9) 17 (6, 50) 25 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.4)
Minnehaha County Urban No 180.2 (171.6, 189.1) 16 (9, 25) 357 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Hamlin County Rural No 189.5 (145.1, 243.3) 15 (2, 56) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.4)
Corson County Rural No 192.9 (130.4, 274.1) 14 (1, 62) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.2)
Jerauld County Rural No 196.6 (127.9, 297.2) 13 (1, 63) 6
*
*
Fall River County Rural No 197.5 (163.5, 238.6) 12 (2, 36) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Faulk County Rural No 198.1 (136.9, 282.5) 11 (1, 59) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.4, 4.7)
Lyman County Rural No 198.4 (142.7, 269.5) 10 (1, 59) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.2)
McCook County Urban No 207.3 (162.5, 261.5) 9 (1, 40) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 3.6)
Jones County Rural No 217.7 (120.6, 379.5) 8 (1, 63) 3
*
*
Oglala Lakota County Rural No 222.4 (177.6, 274.5) 7 (1, 31) 19
*
*
Hyde County Rural No 225.3 (143.0, 349.0) 6 (1, 61) 5
*
*
Mellette County Rural No 227.9 (144.2, 345.1) 5 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 3.3)
Jackson County Rural No 232.1 (158.7, 327.8) 4 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 3.8)
Hanson County Rural No 243.9 (150.3, 368.1) 3 (1, 62) 5 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.2, 7.9)
Dewey County Rural No 252.5 (184.7, 336.0) 2 (1, 35) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 1.8)
Todd County Rural No 273.9 (210.9, 348.4) 1 (1, 20) 14 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.4)
Buffalo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ziebach County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 5:28 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top