Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Utah by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Utah N/A Yes 121.5 (119.7, 123.4) N/A 3,494 stable stable trend -0.6 (-0.8, 0.3)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Summit County Rural Yes 89.9 (76.7, 104.7) 27 (24, 27) 39 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.7)
Cache County Urban Yes 113.2 (104.1, 123.0) 26 (15, 26) 115 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 5.4)
Garfield County Rural Yes 115.2 (81.7, 159.3) 25 (2, 27) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 2.1)
Washington County Urban Yes 115.4 (109.6, 121.5) 24 (15, 26) 324 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.2)
Utah County Urban Yes 117.4 (112.7, 122.3) 23 (15, 26) 484 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Grand County Rural Yes 118.5 (93.4, 148.8) 22 (4, 27) 16 falling falling trend -6.3 (-15.0, -2.3)
San Juan County Rural Yes 120.7 (97.1, 148.5) 21 (4, 27) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Wasatch County Rural Yes 121.0 (103.4, 140.7) 20 (6, 26) 38 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.7)
Davis County Urban Yes 121.3 (115.7, 127.1) 19 (12, 25) 364 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Salt Lake County Urban Yes 121.5 (118.4, 124.6) 18 (13, 23) 1,253 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Weber County Urban No 124.4 (118.1, 131.0) 17 (10, 24) 301 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Iron County Rural No 126.8 (113.3, 141.6) 16 (6, 26) 68 stable stable trend -0.9 (-12.4, 3.1)
Morgan County Urban No 127.3 (98.8, 161.4) 15 (2, 27) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.7)
Emery County Rural No 129.2 (101.8, 162.1) 14 (2, 27) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.8)
Box Elder County Rural No 132.3 (119.1, 146.7) 13 (5, 24) 75 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.9)
Millard County Rural No 134.7 (109.9, 163.5) 12 (2, 26) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Uintah County Rural No 138.5 (120.4, 158.5) 11 (2, 24) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 3.9)
Piute County Rural No 140.0 (79.3, 238.9) 10 (1, 27) 4
*
*
Sanpete County Rural No 140.1 (121.1, 161.2) 9 (2, 24) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Tooele County Urban No 140.4 (126.3, 155.5) 8 (3, 20) 79 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Duchesne County Rural No 141.6 (118.3, 168.1) 7 (1, 25) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Sevier County Rural No 151.6 (130.4, 175.3) 6 (1, 18) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Carbon County Rural No 156.4 (134.5, 180.9) 5 (1, 16) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Wayne County Rural No 158.6 (101.2, 239.4) 4 (1, 27) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.2, 4.7)
Juab County Urban No 162.3 (129.8, 200.4) 3 (1, 22) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.5)
Beaver County Rural No 166.0 (124.0, 217.3) 2 (1, 25) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Kane County Rural No 172.4 (138.4, 213.0) 1 (1, 16) 20 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.6, 4.0)
Daggett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rich County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 5:14 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top