Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 141.4 (140.2, 142.7) N/A 10,162 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Swift County Rural Yes 117.8 (94.4, 146.1) 86 (22, 87) 19 falling falling trend -14.5 (-28.5, -2.0)
Chisago County Urban No 166.5 (153.0, 180.9) 17 (5, 53) 118 stable stable trend -7.6 (-13.2, 0.7)
Becker County Rural No 140.6 (126.4, 156.3) 67 (21, 86) 76 falling falling trend -2.6 (-8.8, -1.3)
Nicollet County Urban No 123.0 (108.6, 138.9) 83 (46, 87) 55 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4)
Murray County Rural No 126.4 (102.3, 156.2) 81 (12, 87) 20 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.5)
Scott County Urban No 127.2 (118.9, 135.9) 80 (59, 86) 184 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Cook County Rural Yes 105.6 (78.8, 141.8) 87 (33, 87) 12 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.5)
Koochiching County Rural No 138.9 (118.1, 163.4) 69 (11, 87) 33 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Todd County Rural No 131.4 (115.2, 149.4) 77 (21, 87) 53 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.1)
Dakota County Urban No 130.5 (126.0, 135.1) 79 (63, 84) 666 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Hennepin County Urban No 133.2 (130.5, 136.0) 74 (61, 80) 1,929 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Washington County Urban No 131.9 (126.2, 137.7) 76 (56, 83) 430 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Anoka County Urban No 141.2 (136.0, 146.5) 64 (40, 74) 587 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Benton County Urban No 153.3 (137.4, 170.6) 39 (7, 79) 70 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Lake of the Woods County Rural No 141.6 (101.6, 195.6) 63 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Rice County Rural No 143.6 (132.0, 156.1) 55 (22, 81) 116 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Roseau County Rural No 131.3 (110.6, 155.2) 78 (16, 87) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.4)
Carver County Urban Yes 119.3 (110.3, 128.9) 85 (70, 87) 135 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Jackson County Rural Yes 122.1 (98.5, 150.5) 84 (17, 87) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Cass County Rural No 154.8 (139.4, 171.8) 37 (7, 76) 84 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Kanabec County Rural No 160.3 (138.4, 185.2) 24 (2, 79) 40 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Redwood County Rural No 142.9 (121.6, 167.2) 57 (8, 87) 34 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
St. Louis County Urban No 148.6 (142.3, 155.1) 46 (25, 66) 445 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Beltrami County Rural No 143.5 (129.5, 158.6) 56 (17, 83) 81 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Itasca County Rural No 157.2 (144.5, 171.0) 31 (9, 68) 123 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Renville County Rural No 159.4 (136.2, 185.8) 27 (2, 82) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Blue Earth County Urban No 141.0 (129.1, 153.8) 65 (23, 83) 106 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Mower County Rural No 142.8 (128.8, 158.0) 58 (18, 84) 80 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Steele County Rural No 138.9 (124.7, 154.3) 70 (23, 85) 73 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Crow Wing County Rural No 147.0 (136.7, 158.0) 48 (19, 76) 165 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.5)
Lincoln County Rural No 154.0 (119.4, 197.1) 38 (1, 87) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Otter Tail County Rural No 143.7 (133.0, 155.2) 54 (24, 80) 150 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Winona County Rural No 145.8 (132.6, 160.0) 50 (16, 82) 95 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Clay County Urban No 141.8 (129.5, 155.0) 62 (21, 83) 100 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Morrison County Rural No 157.4 (141.8, 174.3) 30 (6, 73) 80 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Rock County Urban No 152.9 (125.3, 185.5) 40 (2, 87) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Wabasha County Urban No 155.9 (137.5, 176.5) 32 (5, 79) 55 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Wilkin County Rural No 158.5 (123.6, 201.4) 29 (1, 87) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.0)
Carlton County Urban No 168.6 (152.6, 186.0) 15 (3, 58) 84 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Douglas County Rural No 137.5 (124.9, 151.2) 72 (25, 85) 94 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 142.2 (128.7, 156.7) 60 (20, 83) 88 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Pine County Rural No 169.9 (153.2, 188.3) 13 (2, 59) 79 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Sibley County Rural No 146.0 (123.1, 172.3) 49 (5, 87) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Stevens County Rural No 134.1 (104.9, 169.2) 73 (6, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Wright County Urban No 149.6 (140.8, 158.9) 44 (19, 70) 222 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Lake County Rural No 155.4 (130.7, 184.5) 36 (2, 85) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Meeker County Rural No 149.8 (132.1, 169.5) 43 (7, 83) 54 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Pope County Rural No 151.7 (126.6, 181.2) 41 (3, 86) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Waseca County Rural No 160.1 (138.6, 184.1) 25 (3, 81) 42 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Freeborn County Rural No 143.7 (128.7, 160.2) 53 (14, 84) 73 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Lyon County Rural No 155.5 (136.5, 176.5) 35 (5, 81) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Pennington County Rural No 175.5 (149.3, 205.3) 10 (1, 72) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 167.6 (137.4, 203.1) 16 (1, 85) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.5)
Martin County Rural No 148.9 (130.5, 169.7) 45 (10, 84) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Sherburne County Urban No 161.9 (150.1, 174.4) 20 (7, 59) 150 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Dodge County Urban No 133.2 (113.3, 155.7) 75 (16, 87) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Hubbard County Rural No 141.9 (125.0, 160.9) 61 (15, 85) 56 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
McLeod County Rural No 140.2 (126.3, 155.4) 68 (19, 85) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Traverse County Rural No 171.4 (127.2, 230.0) 12 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.6)
Brown County Rural No 169.9 (151.6, 189.9) 14 (2, 63) 70 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Isanti County Urban No 155.6 (140.7, 171.9) 34 (8, 75) 82 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Norman County Rural No 195.4 (157.9, 240.4) 2 (1, 74) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Polk County Urban No 160.7 (144.0, 178.9) 22 (5, 72) 71 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Red Lake County Rural No 159.1 (116.2, 214.9) 28 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.7)
Stearns County Urban No 145.6 (137.9, 153.8) 51 (26, 73) 272 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.6)
Fillmore County Urban No 164.1 (145.0, 185.5) 19 (2, 70) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Goodhue County Rural No 160.0 (146.8, 174.3) 26 (7, 65) 113 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Houston County Urban No 145.1 (125.5, 167.2) 52 (8, 86) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 138.8 (109.7, 175.0) 71 (4, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Aitkin County Rural No 150.0 (130.5, 172.8) 42 (7, 84) 53 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 3.7)
Cottonwood County Rural No 155.8 (131.5, 184.0) 33 (3, 85) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Mahnomen County Rural No 200.9 (155.3, 256.7) 1 (1, 78) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 191.5 (171.5, 213.4) 3 (1, 28) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Clearwater County Rural No 177.0 (144.7, 215.0) 8 (1, 80) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Nobles County Rural No 148.0 (128.0, 170.3) 47 (7, 85) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Watonwan County Rural No 160.4 (133.3, 192.0) 23 (1, 85) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.6)
Le Sueur County Urban No 161.0 (143.3, 180.6) 21 (4, 74) 62 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 4.7)
Olmsted County Urban No 126.3 (119.4, 133.6) 82 (62, 86) 256 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 3.7)
Pipestone County Rural No 191.2 (159.8, 227.7) 4 (1, 66) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Marshall County Rural No 141.0 (114.1, 173.3) 66 (5, 87) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 4.5)
Chippewa County Rural No 166.1 (140.6, 195.4) 18 (1, 82) 33 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Faribault County Rural No 171.8 (148.4, 198.6) 11 (1, 71) 41 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Wadena County Rural No 189.2 (163.5, 218.2) 5 (1, 45) 41 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Grant County Rural No 176.7 (139.4, 222.1) 9 (1, 85) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Kittson County Rural No 184.0 (140.8, 239.0) 7 (1, 86) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
Ramsey County Urban No 142.6 (138.4, 147.0) 59 (40, 71) 898 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.0)
Big Stone County Rural No 187.8 (146.5, 239.0) 6 (1, 82) 17 stable stable trend 5.4 (-3.0, 21.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 12:00 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top