Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A No 184.4 (182.8, 186.0) N/A 11,033 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Oscoda County Rural No 249.3 (200.0, 310.5) 1 (1, 71) 19 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.5)
Baraga County Rural No 247.6 (193.4, 314.0) 2 (1, 77) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.5)
Kalkaska County Urban No 243.5 (205.1, 287.7) 3 (1, 59) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.2)
Iosco County Rural No 236.4 (207.2, 269.5) 4 (1, 45) 55 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Clare County Rural No 234.5 (207.2, 265.1) 5 (1, 47) 59 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Lake County Rural No 233.4 (193.8, 280.5) 6 (1, 70) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Schoolcraft County Rural No 231.5 (182.3, 293.3) 7 (1, 78) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Roscommon County Rural No 230.1 (200.6, 264.0) 8 (1, 51) 57 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Chippewa County Rural No 225.2 (198.4, 254.8) 9 (1, 60) 54 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Crawford County Rural No 225.0 (186.8, 270.5) 10 (1, 74) 27 stable stable trend -8.0 (-14.9, 0.0)
Gladwin County Rural No 223.6 (194.2, 256.9) 11 (1, 65) 49 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Calhoun County Urban No 216.9 (202.2, 232.5) 12 (3, 40) 173 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Osceola County Rural No 216.6 (184.6, 253.1) 13 (1, 74) 36 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Houghton County Rural No 213.3 (185.8, 244.0) 14 (1, 70) 46 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 7.0)
Hillsdale County Rural No 210.8 (187.9, 235.9) 15 (2, 68) 67 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Montcalm County Urban No 210.3 (190.4, 231.9) 16 (3, 62) 89 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Alpena County Rural No 210.1 (183.5, 240.0) 17 (2, 71) 48 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Mason County Rural No 209.7 (182.8, 240.1) 18 (2, 73) 48 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Mecosta County Rural No 209.0 (183.0, 238.0) 19 (2, 72) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Newaygo County Rural No 207.9 (185.3, 232.7) 20 (2, 69) 69 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Monroe County Urban No 205.7 (192.6, 219.6) 21 (7, 53) 199 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Jackson County Urban No 204.9 (192.2, 218.2) 22 (8, 54) 209 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Muskegon County Urban No 204.5 (191.8, 217.8) 23 (8, 54) 213 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Isabella County Rural No 203.7 (179.8, 229.8) 24 (2, 73) 58 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Ogemaw County Rural No 203.5 (174.2, 237.4) 25 (1, 78) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Missaukee County Rural No 202.8 (165.2, 247.4) 26 (1, 81) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.2)
Delta County Rural No 201.7 (178.2, 227.8) 27 (4, 75) 59 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Arenac County Rural No 201.6 (165.4, 244.7) 28 (1, 82) 26 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Montmorency County Rural No 200.6 (159.3, 253.0) 29 (1, 83) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.0)
Lenawee County Rural No 199.7 (183.7, 216.8) 30 (8, 69) 124 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Sanilac County Rural No 199.3 (176.7, 224.3) 31 (5, 75) 62 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Alcona County Rural No 198.9 (158.5, 250.6) 32 (1, 83) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Shiawassee County Rural No 197.1 (177.6, 218.4) 33 (7, 73) 82 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Cass County Urban No 196.1 (175.8, 218.4) 34 (7, 76) 75 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Saginaw County Urban No 194.8 (183.5, 206.6) 35 (15, 65) 237 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
St. Clair County Urban No 194.8 (182.6, 207.6) 36 (14, 67) 211 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Oceana County Rural No 194.0 (166.5, 225.3) 37 (3, 80) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.1, 4.8)
Genesee County Urban No 193.7 (185.7, 202.0) 38 (21, 60) 468 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Bay County Urban No 193.4 (178.5, 209.2) 39 (12, 70) 135 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.6)
Cheboygan County Rural No 192.7 (166.7, 222.6) 40 (5, 80) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Tuscola County Rural No 192.7 (172.7, 214.6) 41 (8, 76) 74 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Iron County Rural No 191.3 (152.4, 239.4) 42 (1, 83) 20 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Wayne County Urban No 189.5 (185.4, 193.6) 43 (31, 59) 1,764 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -2.0)
Macomb County Urban No 188.9 (183.4, 194.6) 44 (30, 62) 959 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
St. Joseph County Rural No 188.6 (169.0, 210.0) 45 (11, 78) 71 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Ionia County Urban No 187.8 (167.2, 210.2) 46 (9, 79) 67 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Manistee County Rural No 187.7 (161.7, 217.4) 47 (7, 82) 41 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Midland County Urban No 187.4 (171.1, 204.9) 48 (14, 77) 102 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.3, 6.0)
Gratiot County Rural No 186.7 (163.6, 212.3) 49 (9, 80) 48 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Emmet County Rural No 186.1 (162.5, 212.5) 50 (9, 80) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Berrien County Urban No 185.4 (173.5, 198.0) 51 (21, 74) 191 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Van Buren County Rural No 184.7 (167.2, 203.6) 52 (15, 78) 90 falling falling trend -2.5 (-6.8, -1.6)
Lapeer County Urban No 184.6 (168.3, 202.3) 53 (16, 77) 108 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Kent County Urban No 183.9 (177.0, 190.9) 54 (34, 69) 580 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.0, -0.7)
Kalamazoo County Urban No 183.8 (173.3, 194.7) 55 (27, 74) 245 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Menominee County Rural No 183.7 (157.5, 213.9) 56 (7, 82) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Branch County Rural No 183.1 (160.7, 207.9) 57 (11, 81) 53 falling falling trend -9.9 (-16.9, -1.9)
Ingham County Urban No 183.1 (172.6, 194.1) 58 (27, 73) 244 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Allegan County Rural No 181.8 (167.2, 197.3) 59 (23, 78) 130 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Mackinac County Rural No 180.2 (143.7, 225.9) 60 (3, 83) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.0, -0.1)
Livingston County Urban No 179.0 (167.9, 190.7) 61 (32, 77) 218 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 5.3)
Otsego County Rural No 178.4 (150.9, 210.0) 62 (9, 83) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.1)
Antrim County Rural No 177.0 (151.3, 206.9) 63 (9, 83) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Wexford County Rural No 176.7 (152.7, 203.8) 64 (12, 82) 42 falling falling trend -3.6 (-11.8, -1.3)
Charlevoix County Rural No 176.0 (151.5, 204.3) 65 (12, 82) 40 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Dickinson County Rural No 175.9 (150.2, 205.3) 66 (13, 83) 36 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Grand Traverse County Urban No 175.7 (160.5, 192.0) 67 (26, 80) 107 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.5, 8.9)
Marquette County Rural No 174.7 (157.2, 193.9) 68 (22, 81) 77 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Eaton County Urban No 174.5 (160.4, 189.6) 69 (32, 80) 121 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -1.2)
Huron County Rural No 174.4 (151.8, 200.1) 70 (16, 82) 47 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Barry County Urban No 174.2 (154.9, 195.4) 71 (20, 82) 68 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Benzie County Urban No 173.0 (143.4, 208.0) 72 (9, 83) 27 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Luce County Rural No 171.9 (124.6, 233.8) 73 (2, 83) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.1, -0.2)
Gogebic County Rural No 171.8 (139.9, 210.6) 74 (9, 83) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.8)
Keweenaw County Rural No 171.6 (102.1, 301.9) 75 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.7, 1.1)
Presque Isle County Rural No 169.9 (137.3, 210.5) 76 (8, 83) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Ottawa County Urban No 163.6 (154.6, 173.0) 77 (58, 82) 257 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Clinton County Urban No 162.2 (145.6, 180.2) 78 (40, 83) 75 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Oakland County Urban No 157.4 (153.2, 161.6) 79 (71, 82) 1,160 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Ontonagon County Rural No 152.5 (113.6, 212.0) 80 (6, 83) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.3)
Washtenaw County Urban No 147.6 (139.6, 156.0) 81 (74, 83) 268 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Alger County Rural No 144.3 (108.0, 191.6) 82 (19, 83) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Leelanau County Urban No 140.7 (118.5, 167.3) 83 (60, 83) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 4:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top