Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota N/A No 176.8 (171.5, 182.2) N/A 915 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Aurora County Rural No 161.4 (93.3, 266.7) 37 (4, 53) 3
*
*
Beadle County Rural No 193.2 (157.7, 234.5) 19 (6, 46) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Bon Homme County Rural No 173.7 (126.5, 234.5) 30 (7, 53) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 1.8)
Brookings County Rural No 173.2 (145.0, 205.3) 32 (12, 48) 28 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Brown County Rural No 157.0 (134.0, 182.9) 42 (19, 51) 34 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Brule County Rural No 142.9 (88.6, 219.9) 47 (7, 53) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.7, 0.6)
Butte County Rural No 210.5 (163.7, 267.6) 13 (3, 45) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 2.0)
Charles Mix County Rural No 158.8 (113.5, 216.8) 39 (8, 53) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8)
Clark County Rural No 202.3 (126.0, 309.4) 15 (2, 53) 5
*
*
Clay County Rural No 199.6 (149.7, 260.5) 17 (4, 50) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.6)
Codington County Rural No 168.9 (142.9, 198.6) 35 (14, 49) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Corson County Rural No 232.7 (113.2, 412.0) 9 (1, 53) 3 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.5, 6.5)
Custer County Urban No 159.7 (122.2, 209.7) 38 (11, 53) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.6)
Davison County Rural No 143.1 (114.6, 176.8) 46 (22, 53) 18 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Day County Rural No 176.4 (123.8, 247.8) 28 (5, 53) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.3)
Deuel County Rural No 176.5 (118.0, 258.4) 27 (4, 53) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 1.8)
Dewey County Rural No 293.2 (177.1, 451.1) 3 (1, 49) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 1.6)
Douglas County Rural No 127.7 (70.8, 222.7) 52 (9, 53) 3
*
*
Edmunds County Rural No 149.8 (95.9, 229.0) 45 (7, 53) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.8, 4.4)
Fall River County Rural No 264.2 (206.6, 336.8) 6 (1, 28) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.6)
Faulk County Rural No 222.3 (139.4, 351.1) 11 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Grant County Rural No 206.8 (157.1, 269.4) 14 (4, 48) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Gregory County Rural No 180.2 (117.3, 269.3) 26 (4, 53) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.1)
Hamlin County Rural No 256.7 (182.9, 350.1) 7 (1, 43) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.1)
Hand County Rural No 192.3 (118.3, 301.0) 21 (2, 53) 5 rising rising trend 30.1 (5.0, 53.4)
Hanson County Rural No 492.7 (199.2, 939.2) 1 (1, 53) 3 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.1, 9.1)
Hughes County Rural No 199.4 (162.5, 242.6) 18 (5, 44) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 2.1)
Hutchinson County Rural No 223.6 (169.5, 291.3) 10 (2, 44) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.0, 3.1)
Jackson County Rural No 326.4 (201.3, 499.7) 2 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.6)
Kingsbury County Rural No 173.4 (120.0, 246.1) 31 (6, 53) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.6)
Lake County Rural No 155.3 (114.3, 207.0) 43 (11, 53) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.9)
Lawrence County Rural No 140.8 (117.1, 168.5) 48 (25, 53) 27 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
Lincoln County Urban Yes 120.5 (103.8, 139.1) 53 (40, 53) 39 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.6, -2.0)
Lyman County Rural No 201.9 (126.2, 308.0) 16 (2, 53) 4
*
*
Marshall County Rural No 152.6 (98.2, 230.2) 44 (7, 53) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.7)
McCook County Urban No 234.3 (161.5, 328.9) 8 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.1)
Meade County Urban No 171.4 (143.3, 203.7) 34 (12, 48) 29 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.1)
Miner County Rural No 192.9 (110.5, 322.1) 20 (2, 53) 3
*
*
Minnehaha County Urban No 211.1 (196.6, 226.4) 12 (7, 25) 181 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Moody County Rural No 135.9 (89.7, 199.3) 49 (12, 53) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.5, 0.5)
Oglala Lakota County Rural No 284.9 (202.5, 387.1) 4 (1, 34) 10
*
*
Pennington County Urban No 181.2 (166.3, 197.1) 25 (15, 40) 121 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Perkins County Rural No 186.0 (114.4, 295.6) 23 (2, 53) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.5, 4.9)
Potter County Rural No 157.3 (90.0, 271.0) 41 (4, 53) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 2.7)
Roberts County Rural No 164.5 (123.5, 215.8) 36 (9, 53) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.6, -0.1)
Spink County Rural No 134.7 (91.3, 194.9) 50 (14, 53) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.4)
Stanley County Rural No 184.6 (112.0, 293.3) 24 (2, 53) 4
*
*
Todd County Rural No 273.3 (183.2, 388.5) 5 (1, 46) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 4.3)
Tripp County Rural No 174.5 (120.5, 247.2) 29 (5, 53) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.5, -0.4)
Turner County Urban No 187.7 (141.0, 246.4) 22 (5, 51) 11 stable stable trend 14.4 (-1.4, 27.5)
Union County Urban No 171.8 (136.4, 214.0) 33 (9, 51) 17 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.6)
Walworth County Rural No 157.7 (109.5, 224.2) 40 (9, 53) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.6)
Yankton County Rural No 131.6 (107.1, 160.5) 51 (29, 53) 21 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -1.0)
Bennett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Campbell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haakon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jerauld County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mellette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanborn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sully County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ziebach County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 2:14 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top