Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa N/A No 178.2 (175.4, 180.9) N/A 3,368 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Ringgold County Rural No 232.6 (165.2, 322.3) 7 (1, 97) 8 stable stable trend -29.4 (-57.5, 0.0)
Jefferson County Rural Yes 120.1 (92.3, 154.6) 99 (58, 99) 14 falling falling trend -4.8 (-16.5, -1.9)
Clay County Rural No 142.5 (113.9, 177.1) 93 (30, 99) 17 stable stable trend -4.4 (-7.5, 0.4)
Dallas County Urban No 137.3 (121.9, 154.1) 96 (69, 99) 61 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -2.1)
Johnson County Urban No 128.6 (116.3, 141.9) 97 (82, 99) 84 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -1.9)
Louisa County Rural No 174.0 (132.3, 225.6) 64 (4, 99) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.8)
Wright County Rural No 145.5 (112.4, 186.4) 92 (23, 99) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Crawford County Rural No 173.4 (138.2, 215.2) 65 (6, 99) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.9)
Hancock County Rural No 178.6 (138.4, 228.3) 57 (4, 99) 14 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.6)
Muscatine County Rural No 168.9 (146.2, 194.2) 72 (18, 95) 42 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Worth County Rural No 157.1 (112.9, 215.2) 82 (5, 99) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 0.6)
Harrison County Urban No 199.3 (160.8, 244.9) 26 (1, 92) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.9)
Winneshiek County Rural No 139.3 (113.1, 170.5) 95 (45, 99) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.1, -0.1)
Buena Vista County Rural No 146.6 (116.5, 182.3) 90 (25, 99) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Dubuque County Urban No 164.0 (149.4, 179.7) 76 (40, 92) 97 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Story County Urban No 141.4 (125.3, 159.0) 94 (63, 99) 58 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Appanoose County Rural No 172.9 (136.9, 217.1) 66 (6, 98) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.0)
Guthrie County Urban No 189.5 (148.2, 240.4) 40 (2, 97) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Jasper County Urban No 170.7 (148.6, 195.5) 69 (18, 95) 44 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Lee County Rural No 193.9 (169.1, 221.7) 34 (6, 82) 47 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Page County Rural No 200.0 (164.4, 241.8) 24 (2, 91) 23 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Fremont County Rural No 185.6 (136.2, 250.2) 45 (1, 99) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 0.9)
Hamilton County Rural No 154.8 (123.2, 193.2) 87 (17, 99) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Humboldt County Rural No 146.2 (109.1, 193.6) 91 (16, 99) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.4)
Jones County Urban No 156.4 (129.1, 188.3) 86 (21, 99) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Sac County Rural No 128.0 (93.9, 172.5) 98 (35, 99) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 0.6)
Scott County Urban No 179.6 (167.6, 192.2) 53 (27, 76) 178 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Marshall County Rural No 188.5 (164.4, 215.3) 42 (7, 85) 46 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Monona County Rural No 179.4 (135.8, 234.8) 54 (2, 99) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.3)
Union County Rural No 206.2 (162.3, 259.2) 18 (1, 93) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Wayne County Rural No 198.1 (141.9, 271.0) 28 (1, 99) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.2)
Carroll County Rural No 178.7 (148.8, 213.4) 56 (8, 96) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Cedar County Rural No 168.1 (137.1, 204.7) 73 (12, 98) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Cerro Gordo County Rural No 183.9 (162.5, 207.6) 47 (13, 87) 57 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Linn County Urban No 163.9 (154.0, 174.4) 77 (48, 88) 211 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
O'Brien County Rural No 175.2 (139.3, 218.2) 61 (5, 98) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Plymouth County Rural No 167.8 (140.0, 199.7) 75 (13, 98) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Polk County Urban No 191.3 (183.0, 199.9) 37 (20, 60) 431 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Shelby County Rural No 179.6 (141.9, 225.7) 52 (4, 98) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.3)
Woodbury County Urban No 175.2 (159.3, 192.2) 62 (23, 86) 94 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -1.0)
Sioux County Rural No 151.6 (127.7, 178.7) 88 (36, 99) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Warren County Urban No 168.9 (147.9, 192.2) 71 (21, 94) 49 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Webster County Rural No 201.9 (176.2, 230.4) 22 (4, 74) 47 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Adair County Rural No 156.6 (113.9, 212.5) 84 (6, 99) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.9, 1.0)
Audubon County Rural No 197.2 (138.5, 275.6) 30 (1, 99) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.4)
Benton County Urban No 161.3 (134.8, 191.8) 80 (18, 98) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Dickinson County Rural No 161.5 (133.6, 194.8) 79 (20, 99) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Marion County Rural No 203.1 (176.5, 232.9) 20 (3, 75) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Osceola County Rural No 178.0 (129.0, 242.8) 58 (2, 99) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Pottawattamie County Urban No 213.1 (195.7, 231.7) 12 (3, 47) 117 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Wapello County Rural No 208.7 (181.5, 239.1) 15 (2, 71) 44 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.2)
Buchanan County Rural No 179.7 (147.3, 217.3) 51 (5, 97) 22 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Fayette County Rural No 185.7 (153.4, 223.4) 44 (5, 95) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Hardin County Rural No 177.3 (145.4, 215.1) 59 (7, 97) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Keokuk County Rural No 168.1 (127.1, 219.4) 74 (3, 99) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 0.8)
Kossuth County Rural No 156.6 (125.2, 194.7) 83 (15, 99) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Mahaska County Rural No 187.9 (156.2, 224.4) 43 (5, 94) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Allamakee County Rural No 160.9 (126.3, 202.9) 81 (9, 99) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.6)
Cherokee County Rural No 169.0 (130.4, 216.5) 70 (5, 99) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Clinton County Rural No 199.3 (177.2, 223.7) 25 (6, 73) 62 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Henry County Rural No 182.7 (151.2, 219.3) 49 (5, 94) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Howard County Rural No 175.5 (132.3, 229.7) 60 (3, 99) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.0)
Jackson County Rural No 195.7 (163.6, 233.0) 31 (3, 89) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Mills County Urban No 150.7 (116.5, 192.6) 89 (17, 99) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.8, 1.8)
Calhoun County Rural No 191.7 (148.4, 245.1) 36 (2, 97) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.8)
Van Buren County Rural No 208.0 (156.2, 273.7) 16 (1, 97) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.5)
Black Hawk County Urban No 189.3 (175.1, 204.3) 41 (16, 71) 139 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Franklin County Rural No 203.1 (158.4, 257.8) 21 (1, 95) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.2)
Delaware County Rural No 171.7 (139.6, 209.6) 68 (8, 98) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 3.1)
Floyd County Rural No 189.6 (155.0, 230.7) 39 (3, 94) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 0.9)
Lucas County Rural No 195.1 (150.3, 251.0) 33 (1, 98) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Butler County Rural No 175.0 (140.8, 216.0) 63 (6, 98) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Clayton County Rural No 198.0 (165.4, 236.2) 29 (3, 87) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Palo Alto County Rural No 249.3 (195.9, 314.3) 1 (1, 76) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.3)
Washington County Urban No 156.5 (128.7, 189.0) 85 (20, 99) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Taylor County Rural No 163.6 (115.8, 227.9) 78 (4, 99) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.6)
Bremer County Urban No 181.0 (152.1, 214.2) 50 (7, 95) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 5.5)
Lyon County Rural No 184.1 (143.0, 234.0) 46 (2, 98) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Monroe County Rural No 239.7 (181.3, 312.4) 5 (1, 90) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.7)
Tama County Rural No 179.3 (146.0, 218.8) 55 (5, 97) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Iowa County Rural No 214.9 (176.7, 259.5) 11 (1, 83) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Pocahontas County Rural No 233.6 (178.6, 302.9) 6 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Poweshiek County Rural No 183.4 (152.2, 220.1) 48 (5, 94) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Ida County Rural No 198.4 (147.6, 263.6) 27 (1, 98) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Clarke County Rural No 240.2 (187.6, 303.9) 4 (1, 86) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.3)
Emmet County Rural No 247.8 (195.3, 311.5) 2 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Chickasaw County Rural No 206.2 (165.3, 255.5) 17 (1, 90) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Decatur County Rural No 200.8 (148.3, 267.6) 23 (1, 98) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Greene County Rural No 223.5 (173.1, 285.6) 8 (1, 90) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.3)
Mitchell County Rural No 172.4 (132.3, 222.2) 67 (4, 99) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Montgomery County Rural No 211.0 (166.0, 266.0) 13 (1, 93) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.3)
Adams County Rural No 210.5 (132.4, 321.2) 14 (1, 99) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.4)
Cass County Rural No 195.4 (156.4, 242.2) 32 (2, 94) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Des Moines County Rural No 203.4 (179.4, 230.1) 19 (4, 72) 54 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 7.3)
Davis County Rural No 193.6 (143.4, 256.3) 35 (1, 98) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.9)
Winnebago County Rural No 215.8 (169.0, 272.8) 10 (1, 90) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Madison County Urban No 245.1 (200.4, 297.0) 3 (1, 63) 23 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.5)
Grundy County Urban No 190.7 (151.2, 238.4) 38 (2, 97) 16 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.4, 14.1)
Boone County Urban No 223.3 (190.2, 260.8) 9 (1, 67) 35 rising rising trend 8.1 (0.6, 12.9)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 4:36 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top