Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 167.2 (165.2, 169.3) N/A 5,394 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.7)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Swift County Rural No 136.0 (100.2, 182.0) 85 (17, 87) 10 falling falling trend -21.6 (-44.4, -1.2)
Douglas County Rural No 148.0 (129.2, 169.2) 78 (39, 86) 47 falling falling trend -4.8 (-13.0, -1.8)
Murray County Rural Yes 113.6 (81.3, 157.9) 86 (46, 87) 8 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.9, -1.1)
Koochiching County Rural No 156.0 (124.4, 195.5) 74 (12, 87) 17 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Todd County Rural No 149.4 (125.8, 176.6) 77 (27, 86) 30 falling falling trend -2.5 (-6.9, -1.3)
Rice County Rural No 157.3 (139.3, 176.9) 70 (30, 85) 58 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.8)
Scott County Urban No 146.9 (133.3, 161.4) 79 (53, 86) 96 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Jackson County Rural No 138.7 (104.2, 182.8) 84 (16, 87) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.3)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 140.9 (101.4, 194.9) 83 (10, 87) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.8)
Lincoln County Rural No 198.8 (143.4, 271.7) 19 (1, 86) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 0.5)
Washington County Urban No 146.1 (137.2, 155.5) 80 (62, 85) 214 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Olmsted County Urban No 144.4 (133.3, 156.3) 82 (59, 86) 128 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.4)
Carver County Urban No 144.6 (129.4, 160.9) 81 (50, 86) 73 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Hennepin County Urban No 156.4 (152.0, 161.0) 72 (56, 78) 985 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Lyon County Rural No 180.2 (150.1, 214.6) 39 (4, 83) 26 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.6)
Mahnomen County Rural No 191.5 (128.9, 275.8) 27 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.5)
Nicollet County Urban No 162.5 (138.0, 190.2) 66 (15, 85) 32 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3)
Pope County Rural No 166.5 (129.4, 212.3) 64 (5, 87) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Red Lake County Rural No 168.0 (107.4, 255.1) 61 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.7, 0.9)
Roseau County Rural No 173.6 (138.0, 216.0) 50 (4, 86) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
St. Louis County Urban No 178.2 (167.9, 188.9) 42 (22, 64) 241 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Steele County Rural No 154.9 (133.0, 179.6) 75 (26, 86) 37 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Anoka County Urban No 167.0 (158.4, 176.0) 63 (37, 74) 313 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Benton County Urban No 189.6 (162.8, 219.4) 29 (4, 78) 38 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Dakota County Urban No 156.0 (148.4, 163.8) 73 (51, 80) 345 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Itasca County Rural No 193.4 (173.0, 215.9) 24 (6, 63) 71 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Redwood County Rural No 171.0 (138.0, 210.3) 57 (5, 86) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Sibley County Rural No 156.9 (122.6, 198.4) 71 (9, 87) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3)
Winona County Rural No 170.6 (149.4, 194.2) 59 (14, 83) 50 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Becker County Rural No 160.5 (138.3, 185.6) 69 (20, 85) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Beltrami County Rural No 171.6 (149.0, 196.7) 54 (11, 83) 44 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Big Stone County Rural No 214.1 (152.4, 295.8) 9 (1, 86) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.3)
Cook County Rural Yes 105.0 (68.3, 161.7) 87 (46, 87) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.8)
Morrison County Rural No 176.3 (152.6, 203.0) 46 (8, 83) 42 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Kittson County Rural No 167.4 (113.3, 245.5) 62 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.6)
Kanabec County Rural No 201.1 (165.6, 243.0) 16 (1, 78) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.8)
Mower County Rural No 172.0 (149.4, 197.3) 52 (9, 83) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Otter Tail County Rural No 180.1 (162.8, 198.9) 40 (12, 73) 88 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Le Sueur County Urban No 198.5 (169.4, 231.4) 20 (2, 72) 36 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Cass County Rural No 189.3 (164.8, 217.0) 31 (5, 75) 50 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Clay County Urban No 171.6 (151.5, 193.5) 55 (15, 82) 54 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Pine County Rural No 199.1 (173.3, 228.1) 18 (2, 66) 45 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Stevens County Rural No 150.0 (107.2, 204.8) 76 (6, 87) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Wright County Urban No 175.6 (161.2, 190.9) 47 (18, 73) 120 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Hubbard County Rural No 161.9 (136.3, 191.9) 67 (14, 86) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Pipestone County Rural No 212.5 (164.2, 271.9) 10 (1, 83) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.0)
Stearns County Urban No 169.0 (156.7, 182.0) 60 (27, 76) 146 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Wabasha County Urban No 191.7 (162.6, 225.2) 26 (3, 78) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Wilkin County Rural No 177.6 (125.9, 245.3) 44 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.1)
Houston County Urban No 171.6 (141.1, 207.6) 53 (6, 85) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Martin County Rural No 180.7 (152.1, 214.1) 36 (5, 83) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.3)
Meeker County Rural No 170.9 (143.6, 202.4) 58 (9, 85) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Aitkin County Rural No 181.7 (151.2, 218.6) 35 (4, 83) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Carlton County Urban No 209.6 (182.7, 239.6) 12 (2, 60) 46 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Chippewa County Rural No 193.1 (154.4, 239.7) 25 (1, 84) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Fillmore County Urban No 201.9 (171.0, 237.3) 14 (2, 73) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Freeborn County Rural No 173.5 (149.7, 200.4) 51 (10, 83) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 171.5 (149.9, 195.4) 56 (11, 83) 47 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
McLeod County Rural No 175.5 (152.7, 201.0) 48 (11, 81) 43 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Blue Earth County Urban No 176.4 (156.5, 198.1) 45 (13, 79) 59 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Crow Wing County Rural No 187.6 (170.6, 206.1) 33 (9, 65) 97 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Dodge County Urban No 161.3 (129.4, 198.8) 68 (8, 86) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.2)
Isanti County Urban No 189.1 (164.1, 217.0) 32 (5, 75) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.7)
Lake County Rural No 186.9 (148.7, 234.1) 34 (2, 85) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.5)
Lake of the Woods County Rural No 237.2 (153.9, 352.7) 4 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.0)
Rock County Urban No 173.8 (131.4, 227.0) 49 (2, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Marshall County Rural No 177.9 (136.1, 230.3) 43 (2, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Clearwater County Rural No 225.6 (175.1, 287.8) 5 (1, 76) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Sherburne County Urban No 200.7 (180.6, 222.3) 17 (4, 56) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.5)
Brown County Rural No 214.1 (184.4, 247.6) 8 (1, 57) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 239.8 (206.0, 277.8) 2 (1, 33) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 194.9 (148.5, 252.4) 22 (1, 85) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.6)
Cottonwood County Rural No 180.2 (143.0, 225.6) 38 (3, 85) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.5)
Goodhue County Rural No 196.2 (174.3, 220.3) 21 (4, 63) 61 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Norman County Rural No 245.3 (186.3, 319.6) 1 (1, 73) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Polk County Urban No 215.1 (185.9, 247.9) 7 (1, 55) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Faribault County Rural No 189.5 (153.3, 232.9) 30 (2, 84) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Wadena County Rural No 238.3 (195.3, 288.7) 3 (1, 54) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Nobles County Rural No 190.2 (157.9, 227.3) 28 (3, 80) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Grant County Rural No 210.8 (154.8, 283.2) 11 (1, 85) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.3)
Watonwan County Rural No 179.0 (138.4, 228.8) 41 (2, 86) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Traverse County Rural No 216.4 (147.2, 314.6) 6 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.3)
Ramsey County Urban No 165.0 (158.1, 172.2) 65 (42, 73) 445 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.2, 3.9)
Chisago County Urban No 194.0 (172.5, 217.5) 23 (4, 65) 64 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 11.1)
Renville County Rural No 207.6 (170.5, 251.4) 13 (1, 79) 23 stable stable trend 11.2 (-2.9, 22.7)
Waseca County Rural No 180.6 (147.5, 219.6) 37 (4, 84) 21 stable stable trend 14.8 (-2.3, 29.1)
Pennington County Rural No 201.3 (160.8, 249.5) 15 (1, 81) 17 rising rising trend 16.9 (2.3, 26.0)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 2:39 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top