Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina N/A No 190.4 (188.1, 192.7) N/A 5,835 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Lee County Rural No 223.9 (182.5, 272.3) 16 (1, 44) 22 falling falling trend -4.2 (-12.6, -2.4)
Hampton County Rural No 231.9 (194.0, 275.5) 11 (1, 41) 28 falling falling trend -3.3 (-15.9, -1.1)
McCormick County Rural No 154.2 (121.0, 198.3) 45 (20, 46) 18 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.2)
Edgefield County Urban No 166.7 (140.1, 197.3) 44 (21, 46) 30 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.6)
Charleston County Urban No 169.5 (161.8, 177.5) 42 (37, 45) 387 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -2.1)
Beaufort County Urban No 138.6 (130.2, 147.5) 46 (44, 46) 230 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
Berkeley County Urban No 178.8 (167.2, 190.9) 40 (28, 45) 204 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
Cherokee County Rural No 213.1 (190.2, 238.0) 22 (4, 39) 69 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
York County Urban No 190.0 (179.2, 201.2) 33 (22, 41) 267 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
Anderson County Urban No 200.1 (188.4, 212.3) 27 (16, 38) 240 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Florence County Urban No 213.1 (197.8, 229.2) 21 (8, 33) 159 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Marlboro County Rural No 221.2 (188.8, 257.8) 18 (2, 41) 36 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Spartanburg County Urban No 197.2 (187.7, 207.0) 29 (19, 38) 356 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Bamberg County Rural No 220.8 (179.3, 270.3) 19 (1, 44) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.3)
Dorchester County Urban No 185.2 (171.2, 200.0) 36 (22, 44) 147 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Lancaster County Urban No 179.6 (165.1, 195.1) 39 (24, 45) 121 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.7)
Sumter County Urban No 234.2 (216.1, 253.5) 9 (2, 24) 132 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Abbeville County Rural No 174.8 (147.3, 206.5) 41 (15, 46) 31 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Marion County Rural No 241.2 (207.9, 278.7) 5 (1, 34) 42 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Richland County Urban No 199.5 (189.8, 209.5) 28 (18, 37) 357 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Williamsburg County Rural No 240.4 (208.8, 275.8) 6 (1, 33) 47 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Barnwell County Rural No 221.6 (184.5, 264.5) 17 (1, 43) 27 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Clarendon County Rural No 229.0 (201.2, 260.1) 13 (1, 35) 53 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Colleton County Rural No 235.2 (208.5, 264.7) 8 (1, 29) 61 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Darlington County Urban No 209.0 (187.8, 232.2) 23 (6, 40) 79 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Horry County Urban No 185.7 (177.9, 193.7) 35 (27, 42) 521 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.1)
Orangeburg County Rural No 205.9 (188.1, 225.1) 24 (10, 39) 107 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Greenwood County Rural No 201.8 (182.5, 222.8) 26 (10, 42) 84 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Fairfield County Urban No 260.3 (221.7, 304.3) 2 (1, 25) 39 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Aiken County Urban No 186.9 (175.2, 199.3) 34 (23, 43) 204 stable stable trend -1.2 (-1.8, 0.8)
Chesterfield County Rural No 218.1 (192.9, 245.8) 20 (3, 38) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Georgetown County Rural No 196.3 (178.6, 215.6) 32 (13, 43) 109 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Pickens County Urban No 185.2 (171.2, 200.1) 37 (22, 44) 138 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Laurens County Urban No 226.3 (205.6, 248.7) 15 (3, 30) 95 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Oconee County Rural No 184.3 (168.3, 201.7) 38 (20, 44) 111 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Union County Urban No 253.7 (219.7, 291.9) 4 (1, 25) 45 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Newberry County Rural No 233.9 (206.5, 264.2) 10 (1, 32) 57 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Saluda County Urban No 196.8 (164.0, 234.9) 31 (4, 45) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.9)
Chester County Urban No 256.7 (224.9, 292.0) 3 (1, 23) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Allendale County Rural No 236.0 (174.5, 312.8) 7 (1, 45) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
Dillon County Rural No 282.2 (244.5, 324.2) 1 (1, 15) 43 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 8.5)
Greenville County Urban No 167.4 (160.4, 174.5) 43 (38, 45) 473 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 2.3)
Lexington County Urban No 197.1 (187.2, 207.4) 30 (18, 39) 323 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 3.9)
Calhoun County Urban No 203.1 (164.8, 248.9) 25 (2, 45) 21 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 11.6)
Kershaw County Urban No 227.1 (205.8, 250.2) 14 (3, 30) 92 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.2, 7.1)
Jasper County Urban No 231.1 (198.8, 267.4) 12 (1, 38) 44 rising rising trend 15.5 (4.1, 24.6)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 3:52 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top