Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A No 142.6 (141.1, 144.2) N/A 6,499 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Pike County Rural No 195.0 (155.7, 242.5) 1 (1, 70) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.9)
Orange County Rural No 189.3 (157.9, 225.8) 2 (1, 58) 28 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 3.0)
Jennings County Rural No 181.6 (154.2, 212.8) 3 (1, 63) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Fayette County Rural No 181.5 (153.0, 214.3) 4 (1, 68) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Jay County Rural No 180.7 (150.6, 215.6) 5 (1, 69) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Owen County Urban No 179.8 (150.0, 214.6) 6 (1, 72) 28 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.8, 9.0)
Scott County Rural No 178.8 (150.5, 211.3) 7 (1, 68) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Lawrence County Rural No 177.5 (157.4, 199.8) 8 (1, 47) 61 rising rising trend 4.9 (0.6, 13.0)
Tipton County Urban No 172.9 (140.6, 211.5) 9 (1, 85) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Grant County Rural No 171.2 (154.9, 189.0) 10 (1, 46) 86 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
Blackford County Rural No 170.8 (136.8, 212.4) 11 (1, 88) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.6)
Henry County Rural No 169.9 (150.5, 191.4) 12 (1, 60) 60 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Starke County Rural No 169.9 (142.8, 201.3) 13 (1, 80) 29 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Pulaski County Rural No 167.0 (129.8, 212.5) 14 (1, 91) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Rush County Rural No 165.5 (134.0, 202.9) 15 (1, 88) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.8)
Knox County Rural No 165.4 (143.7, 189.7) 16 (1, 75) 44 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Morgan County Urban No 164.7 (148.9, 181.9) 17 (2, 56) 83 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
DeKalb County Rural No 162.0 (141.9, 184.5) 18 (2, 77) 48 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Miami County Rural No 159.5 (136.8, 185.2) 19 (1, 84) 38 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.3, -0.1)
Howard County Urban No 158.9 (145.0, 174.0) 20 (5, 63) 102 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Vermillion County Urban No 158.6 (126.6, 197.1) 21 (1, 91) 18 falling falling trend -9.4 (-15.6, -2.1)
Wayne County Rural No 158.0 (142.3, 175.1) 22 (4, 68) 80 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Madison County Urban No 157.6 (146.2, 169.7) 23 (8, 59) 151 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
White County Rural No 156.3 (131.6, 185.0) 24 (1, 88) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Putnam County Rural No 155.9 (134.3, 180.3) 25 (3, 86) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Greene County Rural No 155.8 (133.2, 181.7) 26 (2, 87) 36 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Fulton County Rural No 155.3 (128.8, 186.4) 27 (2, 89) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Clay County Urban No 154.9 (130.6, 182.9) 28 (2, 88) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Wabash County Rural No 154.7 (133.5, 178.8) 29 (3, 85) 43 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 6.9)
Ohio County Urban No 153.0 (109.4, 213.0) 30 (1, 92) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.4)
Huntington County Rural No 152.9 (132.3, 176.2) 31 (3, 86) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Marion County Urban No 152.6 (147.9, 157.4) 32 (19, 49) 836 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.1)
Whitley County Urban No 152.5 (131.4, 176.4) 33 (3, 87) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Shelby County Urban No 152.2 (133.8, 172.7) 34 (5, 84) 51 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Vigo County Urban No 151.5 (138.7, 165.3) 35 (10, 74) 111 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Noble County Rural No 150.7 (131.4, 172.3) 36 (5, 86) 46 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Martin County Rural No 149.1 (108.7, 200.8) 37 (1, 92) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.4)
Kosciusko County Rural No 148.8 (134.4, 164.5) 38 (8, 81) 82 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Clark County Urban No 148.7 (137.0, 161.2) 39 (12, 74) 125 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 6.5)
Delaware County Urban No 147.2 (135.1, 160.3) 40 (14, 77) 115 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Fountain County Rural No 146.7 (118.1, 181.2) 41 (2, 92) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Jasper County Urban No 146.2 (125.0, 170.2) 42 (6, 89) 35 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Vanderburgh County Urban No 145.9 (136.4, 155.8) 43 (19, 74) 191 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
St. Joseph County Urban No 145.9 (137.9, 154.1) 44 (23, 71) 268 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Crawford County Rural No 145.1 (109.4, 190.6) 45 (1, 92) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Jackson County Rural No 145.1 (126.7, 165.6) 46 (9, 88) 46 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Clinton County Rural No 145.1 (123.2, 170.1) 47 (5, 90) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Montgomery County Rural No 144.4 (123.8, 167.6) 48 (7, 90) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Wells County Urban No 143.1 (119.8, 170.0) 49 (5, 92) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.6)
Parke County Rural No 142.5 (112.9, 178.3) 50 (2, 92) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Porter County Urban No 142.4 (132.9, 152.5) 51 (23, 80) 174 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Sullivan County Urban No 142.0 (115.7, 173.4) 52 (4, 92) 21 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Dearborn County Urban No 140.6 (123.2, 160.0) 53 (11, 89) 50 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Jefferson County Rural No 140.6 (120.0, 164.1) 54 (8, 91) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Decatur County Rural No 140.3 (117.0, 167.3) 55 (7, 92) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Randolph County Rural No 140.0 (116.0, 168.0) 56 (6, 92) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Ripley County Rural No 139.1 (117.1, 164.3) 57 (8, 92) 30 stable stable trend 8.2 (-0.6, 14.9)
Bartholomew County Urban No 138.8 (125.1, 153.6) 58 (21, 89) 78 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Gibson County Rural No 138.3 (117.4, 162.3) 59 (11, 91) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Floyd County Urban No 137.5 (124.0, 152.1) 60 (23, 89) 79 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Johnson County Urban No 137.3 (127.4, 147.9) 61 (28, 86) 145 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Washington County Urban No 136.5 (113.5, 163.1) 62 (8, 92) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Elkhart County Urban No 136.1 (127.1, 145.6) 63 (34, 85) 177 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Allen County Urban No 136.0 (129.5, 142.9) 64 (41, 83) 334 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Harrison County Urban No 135.9 (116.8, 157.5) 65 (11, 91) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
LaPorte County Urban No 135.6 (124.2, 147.8) 66 (30, 88) 113 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Hancock County Urban No 135.1 (121.7, 149.9) 67 (22, 89) 75 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Lake County Urban No 134.9 (129.4, 140.5) 68 (45, 83) 485 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -1.7)
Boone County Urban No 134.7 (119.7, 151.2) 69 (20, 91) 59 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Perry County Rural No 134.6 (108.1, 166.7) 70 (6, 92) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Union County Rural No 134.5 (94.7, 188.6) 71 (1, 92) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Franklin County Urban No 133.8 (109.4, 162.5) 72 (8, 92) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.8)
Warren County Urban No 132.7 (94.5, 183.3) 73 (1, 92) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.8)
Adams County Rural No 132.6 (112.5, 155.7) 74 (17, 92) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Carroll County Urban No 132.1 (106.8, 162.2) 75 (10, 92) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 0.9)
LaGrange County Rural No 130.9 (109.9, 154.8) 76 (14, 92) 28 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.4)
Cass County Rural No 130.6 (111.9, 151.8) 77 (18, 92) 37 falling falling trend -11.0 (-19.9, -1.3)
Brown County Urban No 129.5 (102.1, 163.8) 78 (7, 92) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Steuben County Rural No 129.3 (109.9, 151.6) 79 (18, 92) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.5)
Warrick County Urban No 129.2 (114.8, 145.1) 80 (30, 91) 61 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Marshall County Rural No 129.1 (111.5, 148.9) 81 (21, 92) 42 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Spencer County Rural No 128.7 (102.1, 160.6) 82 (10, 92) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Benton County Urban No 128.2 (92.1, 175.9) 83 (3, 92) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.5)
Tippecanoe County Urban No 127.8 (117.6, 138.7) 84 (46, 90) 120 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Newton County Urban No 127.6 (99.2, 163.0) 85 (8, 92) 14 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.2)
Monroe County Urban No 126.5 (115.5, 138.3) 86 (44, 91) 102 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Daviess County Rural No 126.2 (104.7, 151.0) 87 (18, 92) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Hendricks County Urban No 124.3 (114.9, 134.2) 88 (55, 91) 134 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Dubois County Rural Yes 121.6 (104.4, 141.1) 89 (31, 92) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Switzerland County Rural Yes 119.1 (85.5, 163.4) 90 (7, 92) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 3.1)
Posey County Urban Yes 116.1 (94.7, 141.6) 91 (30, 92) 22 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Hamilton County Urban Yes 107.5 (101.1, 114.2) 92 (84, 92) 216 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 11:30 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top