Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oregon by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oregon N/A No 131.1 (129.2, 133.0) N/A 3,938 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Curry County Rural No 171.9 (148.8, 199.4) 1 (1, 16) 47 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Tillamook County Rural No 164.6 (140.8, 192.1) 2 (1, 21) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Linn County Urban No 157.7 (146.1, 170.0) 3 (1, 16) 147 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Douglas County Rural No 157.5 (146.1, 169.7) 4 (1, 15) 162 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Josephine County Urban No 156.3 (143.9, 169.9) 5 (1, 16) 134 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Coos County Rural No 156.2 (141.5, 172.4) 6 (1, 19) 96 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Morrow County Rural No 156.0 (117.4, 204.0) 7 (1, 33) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.9)
Klamath County Rural No 155.8 (140.5, 172.5) 8 (1, 18) 83 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 154.7 (127.5, 186.5) 9 (1, 29) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.3)
Lincoln County Rural No 154.1 (137.7, 172.5) 10 (1, 22) 78 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Lake County Rural No 151.2 (110.9, 205.0) 11 (1, 33) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Wasco County Rural No 148.7 (124.8, 176.3) 12 (1, 29) 30 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Baker County Rural No 147.9 (119.5, 182.6) 13 (1, 31) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.0)
Columbia County Urban No 146.4 (129.7, 165.0) 14 (2, 27) 58 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Clatsop County Rural No 141.8 (123.6, 162.3) 15 (2, 29) 49 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Union County Rural No 138.8 (115.6, 165.9) 16 (1, 32) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-11.6, -0.3)
Lane County Urban No 133.8 (127.8, 140.2) 17 (12, 26) 394 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Marion County Urban No 133.4 (126.6, 140.4) 18 (12, 27) 303 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.3, -1.0)
Polk County Urban No 130.7 (117.8, 144.8) 19 (10, 30) 80 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Jackson County Urban No 130.7 (123.1, 138.6) 20 (13, 28) 246 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Umatilla County Rural No 130.6 (116.3, 146.2) 21 (9, 31) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Multnomah County Urban No 129.7 (125.1, 134.5) 22 (15, 28) 608 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -1.4)
Yamhill County Urban No 127.3 (116.0, 139.6) 23 (12, 31) 98 falling falling trend -1.9 (-5.0, -1.1)
Wallowa County Rural No 126.6 (92.0, 174.8) 24 (1, 33) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Malheur County Rural No 125.5 (103.9, 150.7) 25 (6, 33) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Clackamas County Urban No 123.9 (118.3, 129.7) 26 (18, 30) 390 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -1.3)
Crook County Urban No 123.6 (102.0, 149.2) 27 (6, 33) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Hood River County Rural Yes 118.0 (95.2, 145.1) 28 (8, 33) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Harney County Rural Yes 117.7 (82.9, 166.2) 29 (2, 33) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.2)
Grant County Rural Yes 116.8 (83.7, 164.1) 30 (2, 33) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Washington County Urban Yes 113.3 (108.4, 118.5) 31 (25, 33) 406 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Benton County Urban Yes 108.8 (97.1, 121.6) 32 (23, 33) 68 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Deschutes County Urban Yes 105.8 (98.3, 113.8) 33 (27, 33) 157 falling falling trend -2.2 (-5.6, -1.6)
Gilliam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 6:52 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top