Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa N/A No 128.1 (126.0, 130.3) N/A 2,949 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -1.1)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Adair County Rural No 151.5 (109.3, 207.2) 12 (1, 96) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Adams County Rural Yes 100.4 (53.9, 178.0) 92 (1, 99) 3 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.7, 0.5)
Allamakee County Rural No 150.5 (118.3, 190.1) 14 (1, 88) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.1)
Appanoose County Rural No 152.3 (120.4, 191.8) 11 (1, 86) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 2.9)
Audubon County Rural Yes 117.5 (77.1, 176.0) 70 (1, 99) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 0.5)
Benton County Urban No 123.3 (101.6, 148.8) 60 (9, 95) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Black Hawk County Urban No 126.6 (116.0, 137.9) 53 (23, 79) 114 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Boone County Urban No 134.0 (111.6, 160.2) 40 (3, 90) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Bremer County Urban Yes 103.2 (82.7, 127.7) 90 (28, 99) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Buchanan County Rural No 145.9 (119.1, 177.6) 20 (1, 84) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.6)
Buena Vista County Rural Yes 114.6 (89.3, 145.1) 75 (9, 98) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.7)
Butler County Rural Yes 115.7 (88.5, 149.8) 74 (8, 99) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.2)
Calhoun County Rural Yes 114.2 (84.6, 153.7) 76 (5, 99) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.0)
Carroll County Rural Yes 108.4 (87.2, 134.1) 84 (25, 99) 20 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.5)
Cass County Rural No 149.1 (117.9, 187.5) 16 (1, 89) 18 stable stable trend 3.7 (-4.4, 13.6)
Cedar County Rural Yes 103.4 (81.5, 130.5) 89 (25, 99) 16 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.3)
Cerro Gordo County Rural Yes 119.9 (103.8, 138.2) 65 (21, 93) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.5, -0.1)
Cherokee County Rural No 137.1 (107.7, 174.5) 35 (1, 94) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Chickasaw County Rural No 140.0 (104.8, 184.3) 30 (1, 97) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.7)
Clarke County Rural No 148.0 (108.3, 198.7) 17 (1, 96) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.0)
Clay County Rural Yes 97.8 (75.3, 126.1) 94 (31, 99) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.4)
Clayton County Rural No 157.1 (126.8, 193.3) 7 (1, 79) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 0.9)
Clinton County Rural No 141.8 (124.8, 160.9) 26 (5, 74) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Crawford County Rural Yes 118.6 (90.9, 152.7) 69 (6, 98) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.3)
Dallas County Urban Yes 95.9 (84.8, 108.2) 95 (68, 99) 55 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Davis County Rural Yes 113.3 (75.6, 163.8) 77 (2, 99) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.0)
Decatur County Rural Yes 104.2 (71.3, 150.3) 88 (5, 99) 6 falling falling trend -9.8 (-34.9, -2.7)
Delaware County Rural Yes 120.4 (96.2, 150.0) 64 (7, 98) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Des Moines County Rural No 146.5 (127.2, 168.2) 18 (2, 70) 45 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 0.9)
Dickinson County Rural Yes 112.5 (90.1, 140.2) 78 (16, 98) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.6)
Dubuque County Urban No 126.8 (115.2, 139.4) 52 (20, 81) 97 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Emmet County Rural No 123.2 (89.5, 167.7) 61 (2, 99) 10 falling falling trend -7.9 (-33.2, -0.6)
Fayette County Rural Yes 108.9 (86.0, 136.9) 83 (17, 99) 19 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -0.1)
Floyd County Rural No 137.8 (109.3, 172.5) 33 (1, 93) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.0)
Franklin County Rural No 149.2 (113.1, 195.2) 15 (1, 95) 12 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.2)
Fremont County Rural No 146.3 (102.6, 205.8) 19 (1, 99) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 16.0)
Greene County Rural No 141.9 (105.4, 189.7) 25 (1, 97) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.0)
Grundy County Urban No 139.7 (107.5, 179.8) 31 (1, 94) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.7)
Guthrie County Urban Yes 102.7 (74.8, 139.9) 91 (15, 99) 10 falling falling trend -7.9 (-24.4, -1.3)
Hamilton County Rural Yes 119.4 (92.6, 152.9) 68 (4, 98) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.4)
Hancock County Rural Yes 104.3 (74.8, 143.3) 87 (10, 99) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.8)
Hardin County Rural No 132.9 (106.5, 165.2) 42 (2, 94) 20 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.0)
Harrison County Urban No 129.3 (100.6, 164.7) 49 (2, 97) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.0)
Henry County Rural No 143.5 (117.4, 174.6) 22 (1, 88) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Howard County Rural No 160.2 (121.6, 209.2) 5 (1, 87) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Humboldt County Rural No 126.1 (91.3, 171.5) 56 (1, 99) 9 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.5, 17.7)
Ida County Rural No 138.7 (100.2, 190.7) 32 (1, 98) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.6)
Iowa County Rural Yes 117.5 (92.0, 149.0) 71 (10, 98) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.1)
Jackson County Rural No 126.4 (101.7, 156.1) 54 (5, 96) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Jasper County Urban No 140.4 (120.7, 162.8) 28 (3, 80) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Jefferson County Rural No 155.0 (124.4, 192.2) 10 (1, 83) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Johnson County Urban Yes 99.5 (89.9, 109.9) 93 (68, 98) 82 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Jones County Urban Yes 112.0 (89.1, 140.0) 79 (15, 98) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.0)
Keokuk County Rural No 135.3 (99.2, 181.9) 38 (1, 98) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.3)
Kossuth County Rural Yes 109.6 (82.8, 143.6) 81 (9, 99) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.6)
Lee County Rural No 143.2 (122.8, 166.5) 24 (3, 77) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Linn County Urban No 122.9 (115.2, 131.1) 63 (36, 79) 196 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Louisa County Rural No 160.1 (121.8, 208.2) 6 (1, 88) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 0.8)
Lucas County Rural No 133.3 (96.6, 181.9) 41 (1, 98) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.6)
Lyon County Rural Yes 95.7 (68.3, 131.7) 96 (16, 99) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 1.9)
Madison County Urban No 124.4 (96.9, 158.1) 58 (4, 97) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Mahaska County Rural No 164.9 (137.7, 196.5) 3 (1, 63) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Marion County Rural No 141.5 (121.2, 164.6) 27 (3, 79) 37 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Marshall County Rural No 131.1 (113.1, 151.5) 44 (8, 87) 39 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Mills County Urban No 136.6 (105.9, 174.4) 36 (1, 95) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.0)
Mitchell County Rural No 140.3 (107.8, 181.6) 29 (1, 94) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 2.1)
Monona County Rural No 123.1 (90.3, 166.9) 62 (2, 99) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.4)
Monroe County Rural No 125.4 (87.6, 176.5) 57 (1, 99) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 128.2 (94.5, 171.8) 50 (1, 98) 11 falling falling trend -21.5 (-33.3, -14.2)
Muscatine County Rural No 136.0 (117.6, 156.6) 37 (5, 81) 41 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.2)
O'Brien County Rural No 129.6 (99.5, 167.0) 48 (2, 97) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.2)
Osceola County Rural No 132.4 (90.0, 191.7) 43 (1, 99) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.7, 0.7)
Page County Rural No 130.1 (103.2, 163.6) 46 (3, 96) 18 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Palo Alto County Rural No 182.4 (138.3, 237.8) 1 (1, 75) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 3.7)
Plymouth County Rural Yes 111.0 (90.6, 135.2) 80 (22, 99) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Pocahontas County Rural No 126.2 (89.0, 177.4) 55 (1, 99) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.3)
Polk County Urban No 137.4 (131.3, 143.7) 34 (18, 54) 395 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Pottawattamie County Urban No 145.6 (132.8, 159.5) 21 (6, 57) 100 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Poweshiek County Rural Yes 105.2 (83.8, 131.7) 85 (26, 99) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.4)
Ringgold County Rural No 151.4 (100.2, 225.0) 13 (1, 99) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.1)
Sac County Rural No 143.5 (108.1, 189.0) 23 (1, 96) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.4)
Scott County Urban No 130.7 (121.7, 140.4) 45 (21, 70) 160 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Shelby County Rural Yes 93.0 (68.0, 126.1) 97 (30, 99) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.0)
Sioux County Rural Yes 75.2 (60.2, 93.2) 99 (81, 99) 19 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Story County Urban Yes 117.5 (104.2, 132.2) 72 (30, 91) 60 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Tama County Rural No 155.2 (124.0, 192.5) 9 (1, 81) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Taylor County Rural Yes 87.8 (54.5, 138.6) 98 (11, 99) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.1, 2.0)
Union County Rural Yes 119.9 (90.1, 157.7) 66 (3, 99) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.1)
Van Buren County Rural No 170.6 (122.8, 233.0) 2 (1, 93) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.2)
Wapello County Rural No 162.6 (140.8, 187.1) 4 (1, 53) 42 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Warren County Urban Yes 116.1 (100.6, 133.6) 73 (27, 94) 41 falling falling trend -2.9 (-12.2, -1.0)
Washington County Urban No 134.4 (110.6, 162.4) 39 (4, 91) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Wayne County Rural No 124.4 (84.2, 180.3) 59 (1, 99) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.1)
Webster County Rural No 128.0 (109.4, 149.3) 51 (10, 90) 37 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.1)
Winnebago County Rural Yes 109.3 (81.3, 146.3) 82 (7, 99) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Winneshiek County Rural Yes 104.6 (82.7, 131.7) 86 (23, 99) 18 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Woodbury County Urban No 156.7 (143.2, 171.2) 8 (2, 40) 103 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Worth County Rural Yes 119.8 (82.6, 171.0) 67 (2, 99) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.1)
Wright County Rural No 130.0 (98.7, 169.2) 47 (2, 97) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 1:26 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top