Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A No 131.9 (130.7, 133.1) N/A 9,601 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Alamance County Urban No 143.3 (133.9, 153.2) 37 (15, 73) 180 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Alexander County Urban No 133.3 (114.5, 154.7) 64 (12, 99) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Alleghany County Rural No 149.1 (114.9, 192.7) 30 (1, 100) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Anson County Urban No 164.5 (136.7, 197.0) 8 (1, 85) 27 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.8)
Ashe County Rural No 138.5 (118.2, 162.3) 50 (5, 98) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Avery County Rural Yes 119.7 (94.8, 150.8) 90 (11, 100) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Beaufort County Rural No 123.2 (107.9, 140.5) 84 (25, 100) 51 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Bertie County Rural No 152.1 (123.4, 186.9) 25 (1, 98) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Bladen County Rural No 141.3 (120.7, 165.0) 42 (4, 97) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Brunswick County Urban No 125.6 (116.8, 135.0) 79 (45, 96) 193 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Buncombe County Urban Yes 118.7 (112.2, 125.5) 91 (66, 97) 265 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Burke County Urban No 137.2 (125.1, 150.3) 55 (17, 90) 102 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Cabarrus County Urban No 123.2 (114.9, 132.0) 83 (51, 96) 165 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Caldwell County Urban No 151.9 (138.2, 166.7) 27 (5, 71) 97 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Camden County Urban No 129.6 (93.7, 176.1) 71 (1, 100) 9 stable stable trend 17.9 (-2.5, 35.8)
Carteret County Rural No 139.2 (126.2, 153.6) 46 (13, 88) 93 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Caswell County Rural No 140.3 (116.6, 168.3) 45 (3, 99) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Catawba County Urban No 132.0 (122.7, 141.9) 66 (29, 90) 157 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Chatham County Urban Yes 114.1 (102.9, 126.4) 94 (57, 100) 85 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Cherokee County Rural No 127.4 (109.6, 148.4) 76 (17, 100) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Chowan County Rural Yes 122.4 (95.7, 155.9) 85 (7, 100) 16 stable stable trend -2.0 (-20.5, 0.6)
Clay County Rural Yes 102.6 (77.9, 136.3) 100 (23, 100) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Cleveland County Rural No 161.9 (148.8, 175.9) 15 (3, 46) 120 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Columbus County Rural No 165.7 (147.7, 185.6) 6 (1, 58) 66 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Craven County Rural No 137.5 (125.8, 150.1) 54 (18, 86) 110 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Cumberland County Urban No 152.6 (144.7, 160.9) 24 (9, 50) 283 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Currituck County Urban No 134.5 (110.9, 161.9) 62 (5, 100) 25 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Dare County Rural No 128.5 (110.3, 149.3) 73 (15, 99) 39 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Davidson County Urban No 146.2 (136.8, 156.2) 32 (13, 66) 188 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Davie County Urban No 131.4 (115.0, 149.8) 67 (12, 98) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Duplin County Rural No 146.8 (128.8, 166.7) 31 (4, 88) 53 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Durham County Urban Yes 122.3 (115.2, 129.6) 86 (55, 96) 236 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.2)
Edgecombe County Urban No 158.4 (140.8, 177.9) 16 (2, 72) 64 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Forsyth County Urban No 139.2 (132.8, 145.8) 47 (25, 71) 373 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Franklin County Urban No 125.3 (111.3, 140.8) 81 (29, 99) 61 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.1)
Gaston County Urban No 138.0 (129.9, 146.6) 51 (25, 80) 222 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Gates County Urban No 145.6 (108.2, 193.4) 33 (1, 100) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.6)
Graham County Rural No 163.9 (122.7, 217.6) 12 (1, 99) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.4)
Granville County Rural No 152.8 (136.4, 170.8) 23 (3, 77) 66 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Greene County Rural Yes 106.5 (83.3, 135.2) 99 (26, 100) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.2)
Guilford County Urban No 128.2 (122.9, 133.6) 74 (50, 87) 458 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Halifax County Rural No 157.7 (140.2, 177.1) 18 (2, 74) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Harnett County Rural No 154.3 (142.1, 167.4) 22 (6, 59) 120 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Haywood County Rural No 126.3 (113.2, 140.9) 78 (29, 98) 75 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Henderson County Urban No 129.8 (120.0, 140.3) 70 (36, 93) 147 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Hertford County Rural No 143.1 (118.3, 172.5) 39 (2, 99) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.3)
Hoke County Urban No 164.4 (141.8, 189.4) 9 (1, 75) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Hyde County Rural Yes 122.2 (80.5, 189.1) 87 (1, 100) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.4)
Iredell County Urban No 127.3 (118.6, 136.4) 77 (42, 94) 165 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Jackson County Rural Yes 108.0 (91.5, 126.9) 97 (54, 100) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9)
Johnston County Urban No 137.8 (128.6, 147.5) 52 (22, 81) 176 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Jones County Rural No 154.6 (117.6, 202.3) 21 (1, 100) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 3.0)
Lee County Rural No 133.3 (118.2, 149.9) 63 (16, 95) 59 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.4)
Lenoir County Rural No 144.0 (128.1, 161.5) 35 (8, 89) 66 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Lincoln County Urban No 125.4 (113.4, 138.6) 80 (33, 98) 83 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Macon County Rural No 130.8 (113.9, 150.1) 69 (12, 99) 49 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Madison County Urban No 137.7 (113.4, 166.6) 53 (3, 99) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Martin County Rural No 158.0 (133.4, 186.8) 17 (1, 86) 32 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 7.0)
McDowell County Rural No 164.1 (145.3, 185.2) 10 (1, 64) 59 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.6)
Mecklenburg County Urban Yes 116.3 (112.4, 120.3) 93 (78, 97) 688 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Mitchell County Rural No 163.7 (132.2, 201.9) 13 (1, 93) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Montgomery County Rural No 130.8 (109.6, 155.7) 68 (9, 100) 28 stable stable trend 14.2 (-2.0, 27.0)
Moore County Urban No 124.7 (114.2, 136.0) 82 (41, 98) 117 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Nash County Urban No 136.8 (124.8, 149.8) 56 (19, 88) 100 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
New Hanover County Urban No 128.8 (121.1, 136.9) 72 (41, 91) 221 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Northampton County Rural No 136.0 (110.2, 167.4) 58 (4, 100) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Onslow County Urban No 175.4 (162.8, 188.7) 4 (1, 24) 149 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.1)
Orange County Urban Yes 110.0 (100.5, 120.3) 95 (72, 100) 101 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Pamlico County Rural No 143.1 (109.4, 186.4) 38 (1, 100) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.3)
Pasquotank County Rural No 132.9 (114.6, 153.6) 65 (9, 98) 40 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Pender County Urban No 144.5 (128.6, 162.0) 34 (7, 87) 63 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Perquimans County Rural No 135.1 (106.0, 171.5) 61 (3, 100) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.5)
Person County Urban No 142.5 (124.5, 162.9) 40 (5, 92) 47 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Pitt County Urban No 142.0 (131.7, 152.9) 41 (16, 76) 147 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Polk County Rural No 127.9 (103.1, 158.3) 75 (5, 100) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Randolph County Urban No 143.6 (133.2, 154.6) 36 (14, 77) 149 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Richmond County Rural No 187.9 (166.1, 211.9) 3 (1, 29) 57 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.1, 13.8)
Robeson County Rural No 152.1 (139.7, 165.4) 26 (6, 65) 116 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Rockingham County Urban No 136.7 (124.8, 149.6) 57 (19, 91) 104 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Rowan County Urban No 141.2 (131.0, 152.1) 43 (17, 80) 149 falling falling trend -2.5 (-6.7, -0.8)
Rutherford County Rural No 141.0 (126.8, 156.6) 44 (11, 90) 77 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Sampson County Rural No 164.1 (147.0, 182.8) 11 (1, 55) 70 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Scotland County Rural No 168.1 (145.5, 193.6) 5 (1, 69) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Stanly County Rural No 151.7 (136.0, 168.9) 29 (4, 75) 71 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Stokes County Urban No 151.8 (134.0, 171.6) 28 (3, 82) 58 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Surry County Rural No 155.2 (141.0, 170.8) 19 (3, 64) 92 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Swain County Rural No 203.0 (165.5, 247.4) 1 (1, 51) 22 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.8)
Transylvania County Rural Yes 109.4 (93.5, 128.1) 96 (46, 100) 40 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Tyrrell County Rural No 154.7 (100.0, 240.2) 20 (1, 100) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.0, 1.7)
Union County Urban Yes 121.2 (113.0, 129.9) 89 (56, 97) 166 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.3)
Vance County Rural No 164.9 (145.1, 186.9) 7 (1, 64) 54 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.7, 5.4)
Wake County Urban Yes 107.9 (104.3, 111.7) 98 (88, 100) 668 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.4, -1.9)
Warren County Rural No 135.7 (110.3, 166.4) 60 (4, 100) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Washington County Rural No 188.9 (149.4, 237.5) 2 (1, 77) 19 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.2, 16.0)
Watauga County Rural Yes 116.6 (99.8, 135.8) 92 (34, 100) 37 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Wayne County Urban No 162.0 (149.4, 175.5) 14 (2, 44) 128 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Wilkes County Rural No 139.2 (125.1, 154.6) 48 (12, 92) 79 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Wilson County Rural No 135.9 (122.8, 150.2) 59 (18, 93) 83 falling falling trend -2.2 (-8.4, -1.2)
Yadkin County Urban No 138.5 (119.8, 159.8) 49 (7, 96) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Yancey County Rural Yes 121.8 (99.9, 148.5) 88 (15, 100) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 5:51 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top