Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina N/A No 132.1 (130.4, 133.8) N/A 4,972 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Beaufort County Urban Yes 111.0 (103.6, 118.8) 46 (38, 46) 201 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Oconee County Rural Yes 113.3 (101.7, 126.1) 45 (28, 46) 78 falling falling trend -4.7 (-11.7, -1.8)
Charleston County Urban Yes 116.6 (110.9, 122.5) 44 (35, 46) 338 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Jasper County Urban Yes 117.1 (97.8, 139.8) 43 (17, 46) 29 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -0.9)
Lancaster County Urban Yes 121.8 (110.8, 133.7) 42 (23, 46) 97 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.4)
Pickens County Urban No 123.5 (113.1, 134.6) 41 (22, 46) 111 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Greenville County Urban No 123.7 (118.5, 129.0) 40 (29, 44) 443 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Georgetown County Rural No 124.8 (111.1, 140.0) 39 (17, 46) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Dorchester County Urban No 125.5 (115.6, 136.0) 38 (21, 45) 125 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.5)
Aiken County Urban No 125.7 (117.0, 134.9) 37 (23, 45) 169 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Berkeley County Urban No 126.0 (117.4, 135.0) 36 (22, 45) 170 falling falling trend -7.0 (-10.3, -3.1)
York County Urban No 128.2 (120.7, 136.0) 35 (22, 43) 227 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.5)
Allendale County Rural No 128.6 (91.8, 179.0) 34 (1, 46) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-15.3, -0.4)
Anderson County Urban No 129.1 (120.9, 137.7) 33 (20, 43) 194 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 2.0)
Florence County Urban No 131.3 (121.2, 142.2) 32 (17, 43) 129 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Lexington County Urban No 132.2 (125.1, 139.6) 31 (19, 41) 268 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
McCormick County Rural No 134.2 (100.5, 182.4) 30 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.3)
Spartanburg County Urban No 135.6 (128.7, 142.7) 29 (17, 38) 303 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Edgefield County Urban No 135.8 (112.9, 162.8) 28 (3, 46) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Saluda County Urban No 137.0 (111.6, 167.5) 27 (3, 46) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Sumter County Urban No 137.5 (125.7, 150.3) 26 (12, 42) 104 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Horry County Urban No 138.0 (131.9, 144.4) 25 (16, 35) 442 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Greenwood County Rural No 139.5 (125.4, 154.8) 24 (8, 42) 76 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Richland County Urban No 139.6 (132.9, 146.5) 23 (15, 33) 341 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Williamsburg County Rural No 140.3 (120.2, 163.5) 22 (4, 45) 38 stable stable trend -1.9 (-20.5, 3.8)
Lee County Rural No 141.0 (112.0, 176.2) 21 (1, 46) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.2)
Chesterfield County Rural No 143.7 (125.2, 164.4) 20 (4, 43) 46 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Calhoun County Urban No 144.5 (115.4, 180.3) 19 (1, 46) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Abbeville County Rural No 145.1 (121.3, 172.9) 18 (2, 46) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Clarendon County Rural No 147.5 (126.6, 171.4) 17 (1, 43) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Cherokee County Rural No 147.6 (130.4, 166.6) 16 (3, 40) 56 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Orangeburg County Rural No 153.5 (140.0, 168.1) 15 (3, 29) 104 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Chester County Urban No 155.5 (133.4, 180.6) 14 (1, 40) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Darlington County Urban No 156.9 (140.9, 174.4) 13 (2, 30) 75 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Fairfield County Urban No 160.0 (132.3, 192.7) 12 (1, 42) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Kershaw County Urban No 160.8 (145.0, 178.1) 11 (1, 26) 79 falling falling trend -1.2 (-4.7, -0.3)
Bamberg County Rural No 162.3 (129.9, 201.9) 10 (1, 44) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Barnwell County Rural No 163.6 (136.0, 195.9) 9 (1, 39) 26 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Union County Urban No 164.1 (140.0, 191.8) 8 (1, 37) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Dillon County Rural No 164.7 (139.7, 193.3) 7 (1, 34) 33 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Marion County Rural No 165.1 (141.7, 191.9) 6 (1, 32) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Newberry County Rural No 166.5 (145.1, 190.4) 5 (1, 28) 48 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Laurens County Urban No 172.0 (155.6, 189.7) 4 (1, 19) 87 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)
Colleton County Rural No 173.1 (151.7, 196.9) 3 (1, 22) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Marlboro County Rural No 173.9 (147.7, 204.1) 2 (1, 27) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Hampton County Rural No 174.4 (143.1, 211.3) 1 (1, 33) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 11:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top