Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 122.7 (121.1, 124.3) N/A 4,768 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Chippewa County Rural No 148.7 (114.2, 191.4) 10 (1, 84) 15 falling falling trend -15.3 (-27.5, -3.0)
Chisago County Urban No 145.3 (128.0, 164.4) 14 (3, 63) 53 falling falling trend -11.0 (-18.6, -5.6)
Dakota County Urban Yes 113.8 (108.2, 119.6) 73 (49, 81) 321 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.6, -1.6)
Nicollet County Urban Yes 96.5 (78.7, 117.4) 86 (38, 86) 22 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
McLeod County Rural Yes 113.2 (96.2, 132.8) 76 (17, 86) 33 falling falling trend -2.4 (-9.3, -0.7)
Cook County Rural Yes 112.1 (72.5, 172.6) 79 (2, 86) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.7)
Kanabec County Rural No 123.2 (97.0, 155.6) 58 (5, 86) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.4)
Blue Earth County Urban Yes 113.5 (99.0, 129.6) 75 (24, 86) 47 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.1)
Scott County Urban Yes 112.2 (101.8, 123.4) 78 (39, 85) 88 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.8)
Hennepin County Urban Yes 117.3 (113.9, 120.8) 70 (49, 76) 944 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Wilkin County Rural No 143.3 (97.3, 206.6) 16 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 1.0)
Cass County Rural No 127.7 (107.5, 151.2) 46 (7, 84) 34 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Crow Wing County Rural Yes 114.8 (102.4, 128.7) 71 (29, 85) 68 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Swift County Rural Yes 106.9 (75.9, 148.3) 83 (7, 86) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.4)
Todd County Rural Yes 117.5 (95.1, 144.1) 69 (8, 86) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Benton County Urban No 127.4 (108.0, 149.3) 49 (6, 84) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Carver County Urban Yes 100.3 (89.2, 112.5) 85 (60, 86) 62 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 146.4 (107.9, 195.8) 12 (1, 86) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.4)
Koochiching County Rural No 122.9 (96.4, 157.3) 61 (5, 86) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.2)
Lake County Rural No 126.3 (96.1, 165.7) 51 (3, 86) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Ramsey County Urban No 128.2 (122.9, 133.8) 43 (25, 63) 452 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
St. Louis County Urban No 126.7 (118.7, 135.2) 50 (22, 71) 203 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Washington County Urban Yes 122.1 (114.8, 129.8) 63 (29, 76) 216 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Clay County Urban Yes 119.1 (103.8, 136.1) 67 (17, 84) 45 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Mower County Rural Yes 121.5 (104.0, 141.5) 64 (12, 85) 37 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Anoka County Urban Yes 122.5 (116.0, 129.3) 62 (30, 75) 273 stable stable trend -1.1 (-1.5, 0.0)
Carlton County Urban No 141.0 (121.0, 163.7) 20 (4, 77) 38 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Norman County Rural No 149.1 (104.0, 210.3) 9 (1, 86) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.1, 1.6)
Roseau County Rural Yes 105.9 (79.9, 138.8) 84 (11, 86) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Sherburne County Urban No 132.1 (117.9, 147.5) 35 (9, 75) 66 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Nobles County Rural Yes 113.6 (89.0, 143.1) 74 (8, 86) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Pine County Rural No 143.0 (121.7, 167.9) 17 (3, 75) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Redwood County Rural Yes 120.2 (92.8, 154.1) 65 (5, 86) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Wabasha County Urban No 128.5 (104.6, 156.9) 42 (5, 85) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Becker County Rural No 123.6 (105.4, 144.5) 57 (12, 84) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Beltrami County Rural No 123.9 (106.2, 143.9) 55 (10, 84) 37 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Itasca County Rural No 127.6 (111.6, 145.6) 47 (10, 82) 51 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Otter Tail County Rural Yes 112.3 (99.1, 127.1) 77 (28, 85) 62 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Renville County Rural No 123.9 (94.4, 160.5) 56 (3, 86) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.2)
Rice County Rural No 133.8 (118.3, 150.9) 33 (7, 76) 57 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Steele County Rural No 127.5 (109.1, 148.5) 48 (6, 83) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Watonwan County Rural No 145.0 (109.4, 189.6) 15 (1, 86) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 123.2 (105.9, 142.7) 59 (11, 84) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Le Sueur County Urban No 129.6 (107.7, 155.0) 39 (7, 84) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Meeker County Rural No 130.1 (107.6, 156.8) 37 (5, 84) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Murray County Rural No 136.2 (102.1, 181.9) 26 (2, 86) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.0)
Rock County Urban No 134.5 (100.1, 178.9) 31 (2, 86) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 1.8)
Wright County Urban No 128.7 (117.6, 140.6) 41 (15, 74) 102 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Freeborn County Rural No 123.1 (103.6, 145.6) 60 (10, 85) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Goodhue County Rural No 135.2 (118.7, 153.6) 30 (5, 79) 52 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Martin County Rural No 124.0 (99.9, 153.0) 54 (6, 86) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.8)
Winona County Rural No 131.2 (113.8, 150.7) 36 (6, 81) 45 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Brown County Rural No 132.1 (110.2, 157.8) 34 (5, 83) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Dodge County Urban Yes 108.9 (84.9, 138.1) 81 (11, 86) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.7)
Douglas County Rural No 129.9 (112.9, 149.2) 38 (8, 81) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Jackson County Rural Yes 110.0 (77.9, 152.7) 80 (5, 86) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.0)
Polk County Urban No 127.7 (107.2, 151.5) 45 (7, 85) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
Stearns County Urban No 127.8 (117.7, 138.5) 44 (17, 75) 125 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Stevens County Rural No 129.2 (88.8, 182.1) 40 (2, 86) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 1.7)
Cottonwood County Rural No 138.0 (106.5, 177.7) 24 (2, 86) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Morrison County Rural No 141.4 (121.2, 164.5) 19 (3, 77) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.1)
Hubbard County Rural No 125.7 (103.6, 152.2) 52 (6, 85) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 117.9 (76.8, 177.7) 68 (2, 86) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.2)
Pope County Rural No 135.6 (103.1, 177.1) 28 (2, 86) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Aitkin County Rural Yes 119.7 (95.7, 150.4) 66 (6, 86) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 5.1)
Fillmore County Urban No 135.8 (111.8, 164.4) 27 (3, 83) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 155.6 (131.4, 183.4) 7 (2, 62) 31 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Pennington County Rural No 162.6 (127.6, 205.0) 5 (1, 76) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.5)
Sibley County Rural No 138.4 (108.0, 175.6) 23 (2, 86) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 1.9)
Isanti County Urban No 135.2 (116.3, 156.6) 29 (5, 81) 38 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.1)
Marshall County Rural Yes 107.6 (74.2, 152.9) 82 (4, 86) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 12.1)
Wadena County Rural No 155.0 (123.7, 193.0) 8 (1, 79) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Clearwater County Rural No 134.3 (94.5, 186.8) 32 (1, 86) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 3.7)
Houston County Urban No 125.0 (100.0, 155.4) 53 (5, 86) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Lyon County Rural No 140.1 (115.2, 169.0) 21 (3, 82) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 1.9)
Waseca County Rural No 142.0 (115.0, 174.2) 18 (2, 83) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.3)
Faribault County Rural No 157.8 (127.8, 194.5) 6 (1, 75) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.7)
Grant County Rural No 145.4 (97.8, 210.9) 13 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 2.6)
Pipestone County Rural No 176.5 (135.8, 227.3) 3 (1, 74) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.3)
Mahnomen County Rural No 216.7 (151.4, 302.7) 1 (1, 74) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.7, 4.3)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 137.3 (96.8, 193.3) 25 (1, 86) 9 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 4.1)
Olmsted County Urban Yes 114.5 (105.6, 124.1) 72 (38, 83) 128 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.3, 8.3)
Kittson County Rural No 197.5 (132.8, 288.4) 2 (1, 83) 8 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 6.0)
Traverse County Rural No 138.4 (82.4, 228.0) 22 (1, 86) 4 stable stable trend 3.0 (-3.9, 28.9)
Big Stone County Rural No 167.4 (114.0, 241.7) 4 (1, 86) 8 stable stable trend 9.6 (-3.8, 42.5)
Red Lake County Rural No 146.9 (91.4, 229.7) 11 (1, 86) 4
*
*
Lake of the Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 6:23 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top