Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio N/A No 137.4 (136.3, 138.6) N/A 11,702 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.5)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Montgomery County Urban No 138.4 (133.2, 143.9) 51 (28, 72) 558 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.1, -1.3)
Lucas County Urban No 145.1 (138.9, 151.5) 34 (17, 61) 436 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -1.3)
Union County Urban Yes 112.2 (97.0, 129.2) 87 (49, 88) 39 falling falling trend -2.7 (-11.9, -0.9)
Muskingum County Rural No 144.7 (131.6, 159.0) 35 (8, 81) 93 falling falling trend -2.2 (-7.1, -1.4)
Clark County Urban No 145.3 (134.9, 156.4) 33 (10, 73) 155 falling falling trend -2.0 (-7.3, -0.9)
Harrison County Rural No 127.7 (99.7, 162.6) 76 (4, 88) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Delaware County Urban Yes 109.5 (101.5, 118.1) 88 (79, 88) 140 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Franklin County Urban No 129.6 (125.8, 133.4) 75 (54, 81) 938 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Erie County Urban No 134.5 (121.9, 148.3) 67 (16, 86) 90 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.7, -0.9)
Hamilton County Urban No 134.4 (130.1, 138.9) 68 (39, 76) 758 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Huron County Rural No 142.8 (126.7, 160.4) 39 (8, 84) 60 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.5, -0.8)
Lorain County Urban No 136.1 (129.4, 143.1) 64 (29, 78) 329 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.4)
Noble County Rural Yes 122.0 (88.6, 164.9) 83 (3, 88) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Clermont County Urban No 136.5 (128.0, 145.5) 59 (23, 81) 202 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Mahoning County Urban No 126.1 (118.8, 133.8) 77 (46, 86) 250 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Ashland County Rural No 134.8 (119.0, 152.4) 65 (11, 87) 56 stable stable trend -1.5 (-13.4, 1.4)
Putnam County Rural Yes 112.9 (94.6, 134.1) 86 (30, 88) 28 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Warren County Urban No 124.7 (116.8, 133.0) 78 (50, 87) 191 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Washington County Rural No 143.9 (128.6, 160.7) 38 (7, 83) 70 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.5, -0.5)
Ashtabula County Urban No 146.9 (134.5, 160.2) 27 (9, 75) 110 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Athens County Rural No 136.3 (119.2, 155.3) 62 (10, 87) 48 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Fairfield County Urban No 130.1 (120.6, 140.3) 72 (31, 86) 142 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Lake County Urban No 137.1 (129.5, 145.0) 55 (25, 78) 269 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Butler County Urban No 139.8 (133.2, 146.7) 46 (22, 72) 347 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Champaign County Rural No 137.4 (118.6, 158.7) 54 (6, 87) 40 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Cuyahoga County Urban No 137.7 (134.4, 141.1) 53 (34, 68) 1,373 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Geauga County Urban Yes 121.7 (110.8, 133.5) 84 (47, 88) 100 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Jefferson County Urban No 154.2 (138.9, 170.9) 17 (4, 71) 84 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Mercer County Rural No 124.5 (106.4, 145.0) 80 (15, 88) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Pickaway County Urban No 139.2 (123.0, 157.2) 49 (8, 86) 55 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Allen County Urban No 129.6 (117.8, 142.3) 74 (26, 87) 96 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Clinton County Rural No 154.6 (134.8, 176.8) 16 (3, 81) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Hocking County Urban No 147.3 (124.5, 173.7) 26 (2, 87) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Jackson County Rural No 149.9 (127.4, 175.6) 25 (2, 85) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Knox County Rural No 139.1 (123.6, 156.2) 50 (9, 85) 63 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Licking County Urban No 140.3 (131.0, 150.2) 45 (17, 76) 175 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Marion County Rural No 139.3 (123.4, 156.8) 48 (9, 85) 61 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Medina County Urban Yes 120.4 (112.2, 129.0) 85 (60, 88) 168 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Morgan County Rural No 144.1 (113.0, 182.3) 36 (1, 88) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.3)
Paulding County Rural No 158.1 (129.0, 192.6) 12 (1, 86) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.5)
Ross County Rural No 146.2 (131.7, 162.1) 28 (7, 79) 78 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Summit County Urban No 137.8 (132.6, 143.1) 52 (27, 72) 572 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Trumbull County Urban No 134.7 (126.6, 143.3) 66 (26, 82) 227 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Williams County Rural No 131.4 (113.4, 152.0) 71 (12, 88) 39 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Greene County Urban No 124.3 (115.3, 133.9) 81 (43, 87) 149 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Henry County Rural No 136.9 (114.8, 162.5) 58 (6, 88) 29 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Sandusky County Rural No 142.7 (127.0, 160.1) 40 (7, 84) 64 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Auglaize County Rural No 139.7 (122.1, 159.3) 47 (7, 87) 48 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Belmont County Urban No 136.5 (122.4, 152.1) 60 (13, 86) 75 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Columbiana County Rural No 141.2 (129.6, 153.9) 43 (12, 80) 119 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Coshocton County Rural No 145.3 (125.6, 167.6) 32 (4, 85) 41 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Hancock County Rural No 124.6 (111.5, 139.0) 79 (31, 88) 69 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Scioto County Rural No 166.2 (150.8, 182.9) 9 (1, 44) 90 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Wayne County Rural No 129.9 (118.9, 141.8) 73 (28, 86) 109 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Madison County Urban No 155.7 (135.4, 178.4) 15 (2, 80) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Portage County Urban No 146.1 (136.0, 156.9) 29 (11, 72) 162 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Stark County Urban No 136.4 (130.3, 142.7) 61 (30, 77) 405 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Wyandot County Rural No 136.2 (112.3, 164.5) 63 (4, 88) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Darke County Rural No 134.3 (118.1, 152.4) 69 (12, 87) 54 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Morrow County Urban No 142.4 (121.9, 165.8) 41 (5, 87) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Wood County Urban No 145.5 (134.0, 157.7) 30 (9, 74) 124 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Miami County Urban No 140.6 (129.2, 152.9) 44 (13, 80) 117 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Richland County Urban No 152.4 (141.1, 164.4) 21 (7, 62) 148 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Gallia County Rural No 145.3 (123.9, 169.9) 31 (4, 86) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Holmes County Rural No 123.5 (104.2, 145.3) 82 (15, 88) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Logan County Rural No 155.7 (136.7, 176.9) 14 (2, 80) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Adams County Rural No 198.7 (170.8, 230.3) 1 (1, 19) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Defiance County Rural No 133.4 (114.7, 154.6) 70 (10, 88) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Crawford County Rural No 153.6 (134.5, 174.9) 19 (2, 79) 51 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Fulton County Urban No 143.9 (125.5, 164.6) 37 (5, 86) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Guernsey County Rural No 162.3 (141.1, 186.1) 10 (1, 72) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Highland County Rural No 157.2 (138.0, 178.7) 13 (1, 76) 51 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Monroe County Rural No 137.0 (105.8, 175.9) 57 (1, 88) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.7)
Shelby County Rural No 142.4 (124.6, 162.3) 42 (6, 85) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Brown County Urban No 175.2 (154.6, 198.1) 6 (1, 45) 55 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Meigs County Rural No 154.2 (128.0, 184.8) 18 (1, 86) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Preble County Rural No 151.2 (131.8, 173.0) 24 (3, 82) 46 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Van Wert County Rural No 137.0 (115.6, 161.7) 56 (5, 88) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Ottawa County Urban No 161.4 (142.5, 182.7) 11 (1, 71) 61 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Fayette County Rural No 177.7 (151.6, 207.2) 5 (1, 61) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Hardin County Rural No 185.2 (158.1, 215.8) 2 (1, 49) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Vinton County Rural No 167.7 (130.5, 213.1) 8 (1, 88) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Perry County Urban No 179.3 (155.7, 205.8) 4 (1, 42) 44 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Pike County Rural No 170.1 (144.7, 199.1) 7 (1, 70) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Seneca County Rural No 152.0 (134.8, 170.9) 22 (4, 77) 61 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Tuscarawas County Rural No 152.6 (139.3, 166.8) 20 (5, 68) 107 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Lawrence County Urban No 183.5 (165.5, 203.1) 3 (1, 23) 80 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 6.1)
Carroll County Urban No 151.6 (127.9, 179.0) 23 (2, 85) 32 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 5.9)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 4:51 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top