Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A No 176.3 (174.4, 178.2) N/A 6,851 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.6)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Jefferson County Rural No 268.2 (211.7, 336.9) 1 (1, 52) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.3)
Sequoyah County Urban No 251.6 (230.0, 274.9) 2 (1, 16) 105 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Nowata County Rural No 246.3 (205.0, 294.8) 3 (1, 48) 26 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 10.5)
Coal County Rural No 243.4 (191.4, 308.2) 4 (1, 63) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 2.8)
Okfuskee County Rural No 242.7 (202.2, 290.1) 5 (1, 47) 27 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.1)
Kiowa County Rural No 237.7 (195.7, 287.3) 6 (1, 53) 24 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2)
Blaine County Rural No 232.1 (190.6, 281.3) 7 (1, 60) 24 stable stable trend 0.9 (-10.6, 10.3)
Haskell County Rural No 232.0 (196.7, 272.9) 8 (1, 51) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Grant County Rural No 232.0 (175.3, 303.1) 9 (1, 73) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.7)
Love County Rural No 231.1 (191.6, 277.4) 10 (1, 55) 26 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 7.6)
Pushmataha County Rural No 218.3 (183.8, 258.8) 11 (1, 61) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.8)
McCurtain County Rural No 217.8 (194.7, 243.4) 12 (2, 44) 68 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Caddo County Rural No 216.3 (190.2, 245.5) 13 (2, 51) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Garvin County Rural No 213.7 (190.0, 240.0) 14 (2, 50) 62 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Ottawa County Rural No 213.6 (191.1, 238.3) 15 (3, 47) 69 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Pittsburg County Rural No 212.2 (194.5, 231.3) 16 (5, 42) 113 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Le Flore County Rural No 211.5 (193.9, 230.4) 17 (4, 44) 113 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Adair County Rural No 207.2 (175.0, 244.8) 18 (2, 66) 31 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Texas County Rural No 207.1 (172.1, 248.0) 19 (2, 70) 27 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.0)
Cotton County Urban No 207.0 (161.1, 264.6) 20 (1, 75) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.6)
Hughes County Rural No 206.0 (173.1, 244.3) 21 (2, 69) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Carter County Rural No 203.1 (185.6, 222.0) 22 (7, 50) 103 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Pottawatomie County Rural No 200.8 (186.7, 215.8) 23 (9, 48) 156 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Seminole County Rural No 200.4 (175.7, 228.0) 24 (5, 63) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Kay County Rural No 200.1 (183.0, 218.5) 25 (8, 55) 108 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Okmulgee County Urban No 199.7 (179.6, 221.8) 26 (6, 59) 76 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Muskogee County Rural No 199.3 (183.5, 216.2) 27 (9, 51) 125 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Beckham County Rural No 193.7 (168.6, 221.8) 28 (6, 68) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Marshall County Rural No 193.2 (166.8, 223.8) 29 (6, 71) 41 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Dewey County Rural No 191.9 (142.0, 255.6) 30 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.0)
McIntosh County Rural No 190.2 (167.0, 216.8) 31 (8, 69) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Johnston County Rural No 190.2 (154.8, 232.4) 32 (3, 75) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Stephens County Rural No 189.0 (172.8, 206.5) 33 (13, 60) 108 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Bryan County Rural No 188.5 (171.5, 207.0) 34 (13, 63) 95 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Atoka County Rural No 187.5 (158.4, 221.3) 35 (6, 75) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.4)
Alfalfa County Rural No 186.6 (145.2, 238.5) 36 (2, 77) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 2.8)
Creek County Urban No 185.6 (172.8, 199.3) 37 (17, 59) 162 falling falling trend -7.1 (-12.3, -1.4)
Lincoln County Urban No 185.4 (167.4, 205.1) 38 (13, 65) 81 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Payne County Rural No 184.8 (170.5, 200.0) 39 (18, 61) 130 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Comanche County Urban No 183.5 (170.9, 196.8) 40 (21, 61) 164 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Pawnee County Urban No 182.9 (156.3, 213.5) 41 (8, 74) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Tillman County Rural No 182.8 (141.2, 235.9) 42 (2, 77) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 13.2)
Garfield County Urban No 182.3 (167.7, 197.9) 43 (18, 64) 125 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Mayes County Rural No 181.7 (163.8, 201.4) 44 (17, 68) 80 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Choctaw County Rural No 181.2 (151.7, 216.0) 45 (7, 76) 29 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3)
Murray County Rural No 180.9 (152.7, 213.8) 46 (8, 76) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.4)
Cherokee County Rural No 179.6 (161.2, 199.9) 47 (17, 71) 75 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Latimer County Rural No 178.0 (145.5, 217.8) 48 (6, 76) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Craig County Rural No 177.6 (149.1, 211.0) 49 (9, 76) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Washington County Rural No 177.1 (162.4, 193.0) 50 (23, 69) 117 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Oklahoma County Urban No 174.4 (169.7, 179.2) 51 (39, 60) 1,088 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.4)
Greer County Rural No 173.5 (130.5, 228.5) 52 (3, 77) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Grady County Urban No 172.8 (158.3, 188.4) 53 (24, 71) 110 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Osage County Urban No 172.0 (155.7, 189.7) 54 (25, 73) 88 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Custer County Rural No 170.3 (147.8, 195.4) 55 (17, 76) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Harmon County Rural No 169.7 (98.1, 284.0) 56 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.1, 1.3)
Jackson County Rural No 169.1 (145.3, 196.0) 57 (17, 76) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Rogers County Urban No 168.5 (157.4, 180.2) 58 (35, 71) 179 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
McClain County Urban No 167.8 (150.7, 186.4) 59 (28, 75) 74 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Kingfisher County Rural No 163.2 (136.3, 194.3) 60 (17, 77) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Woodward County Rural No 160.2 (137.5, 185.9) 61 (25, 77) 37 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Noble County Rural No 160.0 (132.5, 192.7) 62 (20, 77) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Ellis County Rural No 159.0 (111.5, 222.9) 63 (4, 77) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.1)
Woods County Rural No 158.9 (125.8, 199.0) 64 (13, 77) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.4)
Tulsa County Urban No 158.8 (154.2, 163.5) 65 (54, 72) 951 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Delaware County Rural No 155.8 (140.8, 172.6) 66 (42, 77) 92 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Logan County Urban No 155.1 (140.4, 171.1) 67 (44, 77) 87 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Beaver County Rural No 153.7 (112.8, 209.1) 68 (9, 77) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.6)
Wagoner County Urban No 153.3 (141.8, 165.7) 69 (49, 77) 137 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Canadian County Urban No 151.9 (142.9, 161.4) 70 (55, 76) 217 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.5)
Pontotoc County Rural No 151.7 (134.7, 170.5) 71 (43, 77) 61 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.6)
Cleveland County Urban No 151.5 (144.9, 158.3) 72 (58, 76) 415 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Roger Mills County Rural No 147.7 (101.7, 211.9) 73 (5, 77) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.6)
Cimarron County Rural No 146.7 (87.3, 242.0) 74 (1, 77) 4 rising rising trend 58.2 (31.0, 106.7)
Washita County Rural No 146.7 (118.2, 180.8) 75 (27, 77) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Major County Rural No 143.6 (112.2, 182.5) 76 (26, 77) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Harper County Rural No 141.0 (97.6, 205.9) 77 (12, 77) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.0)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 9:34 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top