Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 141.1 (139.8, 142.4) N/A 9,315 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Aitkin County Rural No 151.4 (131.1, 175.0) 41 (6, 84) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 2.4)
Anoka County Urban No 142.6 (137.1, 148.2) 61 (37, 73) 541 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Becker County Rural No 137.8 (123.2, 153.8) 71 (24, 87) 71 falling falling trend -2.6 (-8.2, -1.3)
Beltrami County Rural No 139.3 (124.6, 155.3) 68 (20, 86) 70 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Benton County Urban No 153.5 (137.3, 171.2) 36 (7, 76) 68 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Big Stone County Rural No 192.7 (149.7, 246.1) 3 (1, 80) 17 stable stable trend 5.9 (-2.5, 21.7)
Blue Earth County Urban No 142.5 (130.2, 155.7) 63 (23, 84) 103 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Brown County Rural No 167.9 (149.4, 188.3) 14 (2, 65) 67 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Carlton County Urban No 166.8 (150.5, 184.7) 16 (3, 62) 79 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Carver County Urban Yes 121.8 (112.4, 131.7) 84 (64, 87) 131 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.7)
Cass County Rural No 143.0 (127.7, 160.2) 59 (15, 84) 73 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Chippewa County Rural No 167.6 (141.6, 198.0) 15 (1, 81) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Chisago County Urban No 166.4 (152.7, 181.1) 17 (4, 56) 114 falling falling trend -7.6 (-12.4, -0.4)
Clay County Urban No 139.9 (127.3, 153.4) 67 (23, 85) 94 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Clearwater County Rural No 175.9 (142.4, 215.9) 11 (1, 81) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Cook County Rural Yes 106.1 (77.6, 146.4) 87 (28, 87) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.6, 0.7)
Cottonwood County Rural No 158.1 (132.7, 188.2) 27 (2, 85) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Crow Wing County Rural No 146.5 (136.2, 157.6) 49 (20, 77) 162 falling falling trend -1.8 (-5.4, -1.1)
Dakota County Urban No 131.2 (126.5, 136.1) 78 (60, 83) 603 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Dodge County Urban No 135.4 (115.0, 158.6) 73 (15, 87) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Douglas County Rural No 137.3 (124.7, 151.2) 72 (28, 85) 92 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Faribault County Rural No 173.4 (149.3, 201.2) 12 (1, 70) 40 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Fillmore County Urban No 163.4 (144.2, 184.9) 20 (3, 74) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Freeborn County Rural No 144.7 (128.9, 162.2) 56 (14, 85) 70 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Goodhue County Rural No 160.9 (147.4, 175.5) 23 (7, 63) 111 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Grant County Rural No 178.7 (140.6, 225.4) 7 (1, 84) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.0)
Hennepin County Urban No 129.7 (126.8, 132.6) 79 (66, 83) 1,613 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Houston County Urban No 145.5 (125.7, 168.0) 54 (9, 86) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Hubbard County Rural No 143.0 (125.8, 162.4) 60 (12, 86) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Isanti County Urban No 157.8 (142.5, 174.4) 29 (7, 72) 81 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Itasca County Rural No 155.1 (142.2, 169.0) 34 (9, 72) 118 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Jackson County Rural Yes 120.1 (96.4, 149.0) 86 (24, 87) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Kanabec County Rural No 160.0 (138.0, 185.1) 25 (3, 82) 40 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 144.0 (130.0, 159.5) 57 (17, 83) 85 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Kittson County Rural No 187.9 (143.4, 244.9) 5 (1, 85) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 2.9)
Koochiching County Rural No 140.2 (118.9, 165.5) 66 (11, 87) 32 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 138.5 (109.2, 175.3) 69 (5, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Lake County Rural No 157.1 (131.9, 186.8) 30 (2, 85) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Lake of the Woods County Rural No 146.4 (104.9, 202.9) 50 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1)
Le Sueur County Urban No 161.9 (143.9, 181.8) 22 (4, 71) 61 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 4.7)
Lincoln County Rural No 148.4 (114.4, 191.4) 45 (1, 87) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Lyon County Rural No 155.0 (135.5, 176.8) 35 (5, 83) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Mahnomen County Rural No 151.9 (105.3, 217.8) 39 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.3)
Marshall County Rural No 141.1 (113.9, 174.1) 65 (5, 87) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 5.5)
Martin County Rural No 150.5 (131.5, 172.1) 43 (7, 83) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
McLeod County Rural No 141.2 (126.9, 156.8) 64 (19, 84) 75 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Meeker County Rural No 150.9 (132.8, 171.0) 42 (7, 83) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 192.3 (171.7, 215.0) 4 (1, 29) 66 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Morrison County Rural No 158.1 (142.3, 175.2) 28 (5, 73) 79 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Mower County Rural No 143.7 (129.1, 159.9) 58 (15, 84) 76 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Murray County Rural No 128.5 (103.7, 159.5) 80 (13, 87) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.4)
Nicollet County Urban No 124.0 (109.2, 140.4) 83 (43, 87) 53 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Nobles County Rural No 155.8 (132.5, 183.0) 32 (3, 84) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Norman County Rural No 197.6 (158.8, 244.6) 1 (1, 67) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Olmsted County Urban No 125.6 (118.4, 133.3) 82 (64, 87) 233 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Otter Tail County Rural No 145.4 (134.4, 157.2) 55 (20, 78) 149 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Pennington County Rural No 176.8 (150.0, 207.5) 10 (1, 68) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 0.9)
Pine County Rural No 171.2 (154.0, 190.1) 13 (2, 55) 77 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Pipestone County Rural No 196.8 (164.2, 235.1) 2 (1, 56) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Polk County Urban No 160.6 (143.5, 179.3) 24 (4, 74) 69 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Pope County Rural No 153.3 (127.7, 183.3) 37 (3, 86) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Ramsey County Urban No 138.0 (133.4, 142.8) 70 (46, 77) 727 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Red Lake County Rural No 148.3 (107.2, 203.1) 46 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.5)
Redwood County Rural No 146.8 (124.5, 172.6) 48 (6, 86) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Renville County Rural No 159.5 (136.0, 186.7) 26 (2, 82) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Rice County Rural No 145.8 (133.6, 159.0) 52 (18, 81) 110 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Rock County Urban No 155.7 (127.5, 189.2) 33 (2, 86) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Roseau County Rural No 133.5 (112.3, 158.2) 74 (14, 87) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Scott County Urban No 127.4 (118.7, 136.6) 81 (57, 87) 166 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Sherburne County Urban No 164.0 (151.9, 176.8) 19 (6, 53) 146 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Sibley County Rural No 145.7 (122.3, 172.7) 53 (7, 86) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
St. Louis County Urban No 147.4 (141.0, 154.0) 47 (28, 68) 428 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Stearns County Urban No 146.0 (138.0, 154.4) 51 (27, 73) 260 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Steele County Rural No 142.5 (127.8, 158.8) 62 (17, 85) 71 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Stevens County Rural No 133.2 (103.3, 169.7) 76 (5, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Swift County Rural Yes 120.6 (96.3, 150.5) 85 (20, 87) 19 falling falling trend -14.7 (-29.0, -2.2)
Todd County Rural No 132.1 (115.5, 150.8) 77 (26, 87) 52 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Traverse County Rural No 178.1 (131.9, 241.4) 8 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Wabasha County Urban No 156.9 (138.1, 177.9) 31 (4, 81) 54 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Wadena County Rural No 184.8 (159.2, 213.9) 6 (1, 54) 39 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Waseca County Rural No 162.3 (140.3, 187.2) 21 (2, 79) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Washington County Urban No 133.4 (127.5, 139.5) 75 (53, 83) 402 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Watonwan County Rural No 177.1 (145.2, 215.3) 9 (1, 80) 26 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 1.9)
Wilkin County Rural No 152.5 (117.9, 195.5) 38 (1, 87) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Winona County Rural No 148.4 (134.8, 163.2) 44 (13, 80) 94 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Wright County Urban No 151.8 (142.7, 161.3) 40 (15, 66) 217 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 165.5 (134.5, 202.4) 18 (1, 85) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 5:20 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top