Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina N/A No 155.8 (154.2, 157.4) N/A 7,955 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.1)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Lee County Rural No 170.4 (134.0, 215.8) 23 (2, 46) 16 falling falling trend -4.5 (-13.8, -1.7)
Charleston County Urban No 130.7 (125.5, 136.1) 45 (42, 46) 490 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -2.5)
Georgetown County Rural No 151.3 (138.9, 164.9) 39 (21, 44) 142 falling falling trend -2.2 (-7.1, -0.9)
Greenville County Urban No 138.8 (134.2, 143.5) 44 (39, 45) 713 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.7, -1.4)
McCormick County Rural No 158.6 (120.9, 212.3) 32 (2, 46) 23 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.1)
Beaufort County Urban Yes 120.7 (114.4, 127.3) 46 (44, 46) 356 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Berkeley County Urban No 154.2 (145.8, 163.0) 34 (23, 43) 275 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
York County Urban No 155.8 (148.9, 163.0) 33 (23, 42) 399 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.6, -0.7)
Williamsburg County Rural No 182.0 (153.8, 215.0) 19 (2, 43) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Calhoun County Urban No 146.3 (119.3, 179.4) 42 (12, 46) 21 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Aiken County Urban No 152.9 (144.8, 161.4) 37 (24, 43) 291 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Cherokee County Rural No 182.7 (167.0, 199.6) 17 (5, 31) 105 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Dorchester County Urban No 153.5 (143.9, 163.5) 36 (22, 43) 203 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Richland County Urban No 152.3 (144.9, 159.9) 38 (26, 43) 338 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Spartanburg County Urban No 164.4 (158.0, 171.0) 24 (19, 35) 524 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Clarendon County Rural No 176.3 (154.1, 201.6) 21 (5, 42) 52 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Florence County Urban No 162.6 (151.8, 174.2) 29 (17, 41) 175 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Lancaster County Urban No 145.8 (135.9, 156.3) 43 (28, 45) 175 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Sumter County Urban No 182.9 (168.5, 198.2) 16 (5, 29) 125 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Lexington County Urban No 163.2 (156.8, 169.8) 27 (19, 37) 513 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Marlboro County Rural No 209.4 (179.4, 243.8) 4 (1, 27) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Oconee County Rural No 147.8 (137.6, 158.8) 41 (26, 44) 176 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Anderson County Urban No 160.9 (153.4, 168.6) 30 (20, 39) 372 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.4, 1.3)
Colleton County Rural No 206.1 (184.6, 229.8) 5 (1, 21) 72 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Darlington County Urban No 186.3 (169.7, 204.4) 13 (4, 30) 99 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Greenwood County Rural No 163.5 (149.8, 178.4) 26 (14, 42) 114 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Horry County Urban No 163.9 (158.6, 169.3) 25 (19, 34) 874 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Kershaw County Urban No 186.7 (171.9, 202.5) 12 (5, 27) 126 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Pickens County Urban No 154.0 (145.1, 163.4) 35 (23, 43) 234 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Union County Urban No 196.5 (173.3, 222.4) 11 (1, 29) 56 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Chesterfield County Rural No 184.0 (165.2, 204.6) 15 (4, 33) 75 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Marion County Rural No 213.5 (184.1, 247.3) 3 (1, 23) 42 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Abbeville County Rural No 159.6 (138.6, 183.6) 31 (10, 45) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Orangeburg County Rural No 182.7 (165.3, 201.7) 18 (4, 34) 93 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Barnwell County Rural No 197.2 (167.8, 231.0) 10 (1, 37) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Dillon County Rural No 225.2 (195.4, 258.8) 2 (1, 18) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Newberry County Rural No 179.7 (160.1, 201.3) 20 (4, 39) 70 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Chester County Urban No 205.9 (182.7, 231.7) 6 (1, 22) 60 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9)
Saluda County Urban No 163.1 (139.2, 191.1) 28 (7, 45) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Fairfield County Urban No 203.0 (169.1, 243.6) 7 (1, 35) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Bamberg County Rural No 184.5 (146.7, 231.8) 14 (1, 45) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.2)
Hampton County Rural No 229.7 (192.9, 272.7) 1 (1, 21) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Laurens County Urban No 199.3 (184.2, 215.4) 8 (2, 20) 139 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Allendale County Rural No 198.4 (136.0, 295.3) 9 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.6, 3.3)
Edgefield County Urban No 149.1 (127.8, 173.7) 40 (15, 46) 37 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.2, 9.7)
Jasper County Urban No 173.2 (149.2, 201.3) 22 (5, 44) 47 rising rising trend 10.0 (0.3, 16.8)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 2:52 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top