Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota N/A No 149.0 (145.6, 152.4) N/A 1,600 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Tripp County Rural No 137.4 (101.8, 184.0) 35 (7, 58) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.0, -0.9)
Brule County Rural No 128.6 (92.0, 176.9) 44 (8, 58) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.2, -0.4)
Stanley County Rural No 147.9 (102.0, 212.2) 29 (4, 58) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.4)
Roberts County Rural No 126.8 (98.1, 163.8) 46 (14, 58) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.6)
Davison County Rural Yes 118.8 (101.1, 139.2) 50 (28, 58) 34 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Lawrence County Rural No 131.8 (115.7, 149.8) 40 (20, 55) 53 falling falling trend -1.9 (-4.8, -1.2)
Sanborn County Rural No 133.5 (83.1, 208.1) 39 (4, 58) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.7, 0.8)
Butte County Rural No 172.0 (141.7, 207.5) 14 (4, 44) 24 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.5)
Yankton County Rural Yes 122.0 (105.7, 140.5) 49 (27, 57) 43 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.8)
Custer County Urban No 136.5 (111.6, 168.3) 37 (12, 57) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Douglas County Rural No 123.0 (78.8, 187.6) 48 (6, 58) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 0.7)
Walworth County Rural No 125.3 (94.7, 166.7) 47 (12, 58) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.6)
McPherson County Rural Yes 115.4 (75.0, 178.6) 56 (9, 58) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 1.3)
Meade County Urban No 150.7 (132.4, 171.0) 25 (11, 48) 52 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Spink County Rural Yes 117.1 (88.6, 153.7) 53 (16, 58) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Union County Urban No 158.8 (135.5, 185.5) 20 (7, 46) 35 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Lake County Rural No 130.3 (104.2, 161.8) 42 (14, 58) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.2)
Codington County Rural No 144.7 (128.1, 163.1) 32 (14, 50) 58 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Gregory County Rural No 145.3 (103.4, 201.8) 30 (5, 58) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.0)
Brookings County Rural No 141.0 (123.0, 160.9) 33 (15, 52) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Day County Rural No 131.4 (100.2, 172.8) 41 (9, 58) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.4)
Kingsbury County Rural No 148.1 (112.2, 193.8) 28 (6, 57) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.3)
Pennington County Urban No 150.4 (141.0, 160.4) 26 (16, 39) 209 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Bon Homme County Rural No 144.8 (112.2, 185.3) 31 (7, 57) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.1)
Brown County Rural No 137.1 (122.2, 153.4) 36 (18, 52) 66 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Charles Mix County Rural Yes 102.5 (74.6, 138.8) 58 (25, 58) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.2)
Moody County Rural Yes 117.1 (86.6, 157.4) 52 (15, 58) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Deuel County Rural Yes 118.7 (85.2, 164.1) 51 (13, 58) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 1.6)
Marshall County Rural No 128.6 (92.4, 177.8) 45 (9, 58) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.4)
Potter County Rural No 139.9 (91.8, 211.5) 34 (4, 58) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 1.9)
Clay County Rural No 157.7 (128.3, 192.1) 22 (6, 52) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.3)
Beadle County Rural No 157.7 (134.7, 184.2) 21 (8, 47) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Edmunds County Rural Yes 116.4 (83.3, 161.9) 54 (14, 58) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.0)
Lincoln County Urban Yes 116.1 (104.8, 128.3) 55 (36, 57) 81 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 2.9)
Minnehaha County Urban No 180.3 (171.5, 189.4) 12 (6, 21) 340 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Perkins County Rural No 149.2 (103.6, 213.6) 27 (4, 58) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.7, 2.7)
Campbell County Rural Yes 104.8 (61.0, 195.1) 57 (9, 58) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.0, 3.3)
Haakon County Rural No 171.7 (111.7, 261.6) 15 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.1, 15.9)
Sully County Rural No 151.4 (78.9, 270.0) 24 (1, 58) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.1, 3.7)
Clark County Rural No 129.2 (90.1, 182.7) 43 (8, 58) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 2.4)
Hamlin County Rural No 191.0 (145.9, 246.1) 10 (1, 47) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Lyman County Rural No 182.8 (122.2, 267.9) 11 (1, 57) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.6)
Hutchinson County Rural No 172.1 (139.8, 211.0) 13 (4, 47) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.8)
Fall River County Rural No 203.7 (167.4, 248.5) 7 (1, 30) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.4)
Hughes County Rural No 170.5 (146.3, 198.0) 16 (5, 40) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Turner County Urban No 154.5 (125.5, 189.2) 23 (6, 53) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Aurora County Rural No 163.8 (111.4, 236.9) 19 (2, 58) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.6, 4.4)
Miner County Rural No 136.3 (85.8, 211.3) 38 (3, 58) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.9, 3.2)
Jackson County Rural No 243.9 (148.6, 386.1) 2 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.6, 5.0)
Faulk County Rural No 196.5 (135.0, 282.2) 8 (1, 55) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 4.8)
McCook County Urban No 210.6 (165.0, 266.0) 6 (1, 33) 15 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.6)
Hanson County Rural No 255.9 (157.3, 386.7) 1 (1, 55) 5 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.2, 8.4)
Grant County Rural No 169.1 (137.8, 207.2) 17 (4, 47) 22 stable stable trend 10.4 (-0.6, 23.7)
Hand County Rural No 166.2 (117.2, 232.5) 18 (2, 57) 9 stable stable trend 28.2 (-0.4, 51.9)
Dewey County Rural No 242.1 (140.6, 395.5) 3 (1, 57) 3
*
*
Hyde County Rural No 239.8 (150.3, 378.5) 4 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Jerauld County Rural No 192.7 (124.3, 295.7) 9 (1, 57) 6
*
*
Jones County Rural No 227.8 (125.5, 403.9) 5 (1, 58) 3
*
*
Bennett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Corson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mellette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oglala Lakota County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ziebach County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 5:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top