Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A No 154.2 (153.3, 155.0) N/A 26,963 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.8)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Donley County Rural No 146.2 (99.3, 213.4) 190 (9, 227) 7 falling falling trend -10.6 (-31.0, -1.6)
Nolan County Rural No 201.9 (169.3, 240.1) 39 (4, 183) 28 stable stable trend -10.2 (-21.9, 0.5)
Deaf Smith County Rural No 149.0 (113.6, 196.1) 179 (22, 225) 13 falling falling trend -6.8 (-24.7, -0.4)
Throckmorton County Rural Yes 114.8 (67.8, 203.5) 223 (20, 227) 3 falling falling trend -6.8 (-15.0, -3.2)
Webb County Urban Yes 72.7 (54.9, 95.4) 227 (220, 227) 12 falling falling trend -4.7 (-9.2, -3.0)
Shackelford County Rural No 136.6 (85.7, 209.3) 204 (10, 227) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.4, -1.3)
Smith County Urban No 159.0 (151.5, 166.9) 151 (112, 182) 358 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.5, 1.3)
Val Verde County Rural Yes 121.3 (94.3, 154.9) 217 (111, 227) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.4)
Willacy County Rural Yes 88.5 (49.4, 157.1) 226 (95, 227) 3 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.7, 0.2)
Harrison County Urban No 145.8 (132.7, 160.1) 192 (114, 215) 95 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Hartley County Rural Yes 111.5 (76.7, 160.6) 225 (86, 227) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.4)
Travis County Urban Yes 120.7 (117.0, 124.5) 218 (205, 224) 849 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Denton County Urban No 129.2 (125.0, 133.4) 212 (192, 218) 786 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Kendall County Urban No 131.6 (118.2, 146.4) 208 (153, 223) 77 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.8)
Sutton County Rural No 192.2 (110.8, 323.6) 61 (1, 227) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.6, 1.8)
Collin County Urban No 126.1 (122.4, 130.0) 214 (197, 220) 886 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Comanche County Rural No 152.8 (126.5, 184.3) 168 (38, 222) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Grimes County Rural No 155.6 (136.0, 177.8) 162 (59, 217) 49 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Jackson County Rural No 145.8 (120.5, 176.2) 193 (55, 223) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Montgomery County Urban No 149.3 (144.6, 154.2) 177 (149, 193) 796 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Winkler County Rural No 180.8 (126.2, 255.0) 88 (3, 225) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.2, 1.1)
Harris County Urban No 143.3 (140.8, 145.8) 197 (171, 200) 2,721 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Lipscomb County Rural No 138.8 (83.4, 226.5) 201 (5, 227) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 0.8)
Menard County Rural Yes 116.4 (73.4, 213.3) 222 (14, 227) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.7, 2.5)
Mills County Rural No 180.7 (137.1, 238.8) 89 (5, 222) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.6)
Austin County Urban No 143.6 (125.4, 164.3) 196 (84, 220) 51 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Bastrop County Urban No 155.6 (143.1, 169.1) 163 (93, 201) 126 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Chambers County Urban No 167.3 (148.2, 188.2) 133 (45, 199) 59 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.8, 0.0)
Frio County Rural No 148.2 (96.6, 219.6) 181 (6, 227) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.2)
Potter County Urban No 181.4 (168.3, 195.4) 85 (36, 147) 152 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Rockwall County Urban No 143.0 (132.0, 154.8) 199 (139, 215) 130 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
San Patricio County Urban No 186.0 (167.5, 206.2) 74 (19, 164) 79 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Walker County Rural No 152.3 (138.2, 167.7) 169 (101, 208) 88 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Wharton County Rural No 158.3 (139.1, 180.0) 154 (63, 210) 54 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Brazos County Urban No 132.4 (123.4, 141.8) 206 (173, 219) 167 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Dickens County Rural No 177.6 (102.5, 306.0) 98 (1, 227) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.4, 1.2)
Gillespie County Rural No 126.1 (111.1, 143.5) 215 (154, 225) 66 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Hidalgo County Urban Yes 114.2 (104.6, 124.7) 224 (202, 226) 155 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Houston County Rural No 163.8 (141.9, 189.1) 143 (34, 207) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Kimble County Rural No 171.7 (121.7, 239.9) 121 (5, 225) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.3)
Aransas County Urban No 182.1 (160.8, 206.3) 83 (20, 182) 68 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Dallas County Urban No 149.8 (146.5, 153.2) 176 (152, 190) 1,668 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Erath County Rural No 148.0 (131.4, 166.3) 183 (99, 218) 60 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Galveston County Urban No 169.2 (162.2, 176.5) 127 (82, 157) 473 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Kerr County Rural No 156.5 (143.6, 170.6) 159 (90, 201) 139 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Marion County Rural No 156.2 (127.1, 192.3) 160 (27, 223) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.0)
Tom Green County Urban No 147.1 (136.4, 158.6) 184 (125, 207) 149 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Washington County Rural No 137.1 (121.5, 154.6) 203 (132, 221) 64 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Williamson County Urban No 129.7 (125.1, 134.5) 210 (190, 217) 614 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Anderson County Rural No 215.7 (197.6, 235.2) 18 (7, 84) 110 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Bell County Urban No 164.8 (157.1, 172.7) 141 (91, 172) 356 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Brown County Rural No 175.2 (157.9, 194.1) 109 (35, 181) 84 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Callahan County Urban No 168.4 (142.4, 198.5) 130 (21, 212) 32 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Collingsworth County Rural No 182.3 (112.9, 286.2) 82 (1, 227) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 0.7)
Fort Bend County Urban No 131.8 (126.1, 137.7) 207 (185, 217) 423 stable stable trend -1.2 (-1.6, 0.4)
Jefferson County Urban No 160.8 (151.8, 170.3) 148 (98, 185) 255 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Midland County Urban No 137.7 (127.1, 149.0) 202 (150, 219) 133 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Rains County Rural No 185.3 (157.4, 217.8) 76 (13, 201) 35 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Tarrant County Urban No 152.9 (149.9, 156.0) 167 (144, 183) 1,981 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Victoria County Urban No 148.2 (135.1, 162.5) 180 (114, 213) 101 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Burnet County Rural No 158.5 (145.2, 173.1) 152 (76, 201) 117 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Falls County Urban No 168.2 (140.0, 201.8) 131 (17, 217) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.5)
Gaines County Rural No 155.6 (122.5, 194.4) 164 (22, 224) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.8)
Liberty County Urban No 213.2 (197.3, 230.0) 22 (9, 81) 143 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Llano County Rural No 164.8 (144.8, 187.6) 140 (36, 206) 76 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Navarro County Rural No 180.9 (163.6, 199.8) 87 (28, 171) 86 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Parker County Urban No 171.2 (162.2, 180.5) 123 (74, 158) 289 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Titus County Rural No 179.9 (155.1, 208.1) 92 (17, 195) 42 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Wilson County Urban No 157.1 (140.7, 175.3) 156 (78, 209) 69 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Bandera County Urban No 156.1 (137.2, 177.9) 161 (65, 212) 57 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Brewster County Rural Yes 119.6 (86.6, 164.0) 220 (83, 227) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Caldwell County Urban No 174.1 (153.1, 197.8) 115 (28, 194) 53 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
El Paso County Urban No 154.8 (145.6, 164.6) 165 (114, 197) 219 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.6, 0.1)
Hale County Rural No 143.1 (119.0, 171.6) 198 (64, 224) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Hays County Urban No 135.8 (127.4, 144.5) 205 (167, 217) 213 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Hopkins County Rural No 175.1 (157.4, 194.5) 110 (32, 182) 75 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Kinney County Rural No 144.9 (92.1, 245.0) 194 (5, 227) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.1)
Medina County Urban No 151.2 (134.0, 170.5) 173 (81, 216) 60 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Red River County Rural No 206.9 (174.5, 244.9) 29 (4, 175) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.6)
Taylor County Urban No 167.1 (156.8, 178.0) 134 (80, 177) 208 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Van Zandt County Rural No 174.0 (161.0, 187.9) 117 (49, 164) 142 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Gregg County Urban No 174.6 (163.4, 186.4) 112 (58, 160) 193 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Jack County Rural No 194.6 (156.5, 240.4) 57 (4, 206) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.4)
McCulloch County Rural No 187.2 (148.3, 236.1) 70 (5, 214) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Ochiltree County Rural Yes 118.7 (84.5, 164.8) 221 (53, 227) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.4)
Sabine County Rural No 163.8 (137.0, 196.0) 144 (28, 217) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Tyler County Rural No 174.1 (151.6, 199.6) 114 (23, 196) 48 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Andrews County Rural No 191.2 (152.3, 237.5) 64 (5, 213) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.0)
Bailey County Rural Yes 122.6 (75.7, 194.3) 216 (14, 227) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 1.7)
Comal County Urban No 149.2 (141.1, 157.8) 178 (130, 201) 273 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Concho County Rural No 165.2 (112.3, 246.8) 137 (5, 227) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.3, 2.6)
Guadalupe County Urban No 156.6 (146.8, 167.0) 158 (104, 199) 196 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Jim Wells County Rural No 198.1 (160.6, 242.6) 48 (5, 203) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Lampasas County Urban No 201.7 (177.4, 229.1) 40 (9, 151) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.2)
Milam County Rural No 174.2 (153.0, 198.2) 113 (29, 197) 54 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Montague County Rural No 177.5 (156.6, 201.1) 99 (27, 191) 55 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Nacogdoches County Rural No 179.5 (163.4, 197.0) 93 (31, 169) 99 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Newton County Rural No 193.7 (160.8, 232.2) 58 (6, 194) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Orange County Urban No 188.3 (175.5, 201.9) 68 (29, 130) 167 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Randall County Urban No 146.5 (137.5, 155.9) 188 (134, 206) 209 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Stephens County Rural No 183.9 (149.0, 226.3) 80 (7, 215) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Stonewall County Rural No 186.9 (95.0, 346.4) 71 (1, 227) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.7, 3.3)
Coke County Rural No 205.4 (149.6, 281.4) 31 (1, 218) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.3)
Fayette County Rural No 139.2 (121.4, 159.7) 200 (114, 222) 54 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Henderson County Rural No 205.0 (192.7, 217.9) 33 (15, 87) 234 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Jones County Urban No 177.2 (149.5, 209.2) 101 (16, 201) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Mason County Rural No 178.2 (126.4, 249.8) 96 (4, 224) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Ward County Rural No 162.7 (119.0, 218.4) 145 (6, 226) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.1)
Atascosa County Urban No 180.0 (156.8, 206.0) 91 (15, 195) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Brazoria County Urban No 175.8 (167.9, 183.9) 105 (65, 142) 397 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 1.5)
Goliad County Urban No 129.3 (96.5, 173.5) 211 (43, 227) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.2)
Hood County Rural No 151.6 (140.3, 163.7) 171 (115, 204) 154 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 2.2)
Hutchinson County Rural No 175.5 (150.5, 203.8) 108 (19, 199) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.3)
Lamb County Rural No 152.2 (118.5, 195.5) 170 (23, 225) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
Limestone County Rural No 172.7 (148.2, 201.0) 119 (20, 203) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
San Saba County Rural No 164.7 (126.6, 216.0) 142 (11, 223) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.4)
Somervell County Rural No 151.5 (121.4, 188.1) 172 (27, 225) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.1)
Wilbarger County Rural No 178.6 (145.4, 218.5) 95 (9, 215) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 0.9)
Blanco County Rural No 146.5 (122.8, 175.5) 187 (74, 222) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.9)
Burleson County Urban No 177.5 (152.1, 206.9) 100 (16, 202) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Castro County Rural No 162.0 (104.8, 243.6) 146 (5, 227) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 1.8)
Cherokee County Rural No 174.1 (157.8, 191.8) 116 (39, 184) 90 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Colorado County Rural No 171.4 (146.6, 200.2) 122 (24, 207) 42 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Cooke County Rural No 174.8 (158.5, 192.6) 111 (38, 179) 90 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Eastland County Rural No 197.5 (172.3, 226.1) 52 (9, 160) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Karnes County Rural No 146.7 (113.6, 188.7) 185 (27, 225) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Lamar County Rural No 191.8 (175.9, 209.0) 62 (18, 136) 113 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Lavaca County Rural No 170.4 (148.8, 194.9) 125 (27, 198) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Matagorda County Rural No 196.5 (173.3, 222.6) 55 (10, 151) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Panola County Rural No 191.3 (167.3, 218.2) 63 (11, 169) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Scurry County Rural No 166.9 (137.5, 201.9) 135 (21, 217) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Ector County Urban No 208.6 (192.9, 225.4) 28 (9, 89) 136 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Freestone County Rural No 190.5 (164.4, 220.1) 65 (10, 183) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Gonzales County Rural No 177.9 (148.7, 212.7) 97 (11, 206) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Grayson County Urban No 189.4 (179.6, 199.7) 67 (35, 114) 300 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Madison County Rural No 197.8 (161.7, 240.6) 49 (5, 203) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Robertson County Urban No 196.1 (165.9, 231.4) 56 (6, 185) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Uvalde County Rural No 182.0 (150.0, 220.9) 84 (9, 204) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Wise County Urban No 185.0 (170.9, 200.1) 78 (31, 148) 137 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Baylor County Rural No 265.9 (201.9, 347.5) 5 (1, 151) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.8)
Coryell County Urban No 202.1 (184.8, 220.5) 38 (11, 111) 104 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
DeWitt County Rural No 159.9 (136.6, 187.2) 150 (40, 215) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Fannin County Rural No 185.3 (167.3, 205.0) 75 (21, 157) 81 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Hunt County Urban No 189.7 (177.6, 202.4) 66 (28, 122) 196 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Kleberg County Rural No 197.4 (157.4, 245.3) 53 (4, 207) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.7)
Morris County Rural No 214.0 (180.5, 253.5) 21 (3, 141) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Archer County Urban No 128.1 (100.7, 162.0) 213 (86, 226) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Carson County Urban No 185.1 (142.7, 237.9) 77 (5, 219) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.1)
Childress County Rural No 217.2 (167.2, 279.9) 17 (2, 201) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 1.9)
Clay County Urban No 179.3 (149.3, 214.8) 94 (10, 206) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Dawson County Rural No 129.8 (93.6, 177.3) 209 (33, 227) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 2.2)
Ellis County Urban No 170.6 (161.1, 180.6) 124 (73, 165) 253 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 2.3)
Refugio County Rural No 224.3 (172.6, 293.2) 12 (1, 196) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Waller County Urban No 169.1 (149.0, 191.4) 128 (34, 200) 55 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Young County Rural No 219.5 (192.1, 250.2) 16 (4, 115) 50 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Cass County Rural No 199.5 (178.9, 222.2) 46 (11, 140) 74 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Garza County Urban No 200.5 (139.3, 286.8) 42 (1, 224) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.1)
Haskell County Rural No 164.8 (124.8, 217.9) 139 (7, 224) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.5)
Lee County Rural No 158.5 (133.9, 187.4) 153 (42, 219) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Live Oak County Rural No 170.1 (134.0, 215.1) 126 (12, 222) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.7)
Lynn County Urban No 146.6 (99.1, 211.3) 186 (6, 227) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.3, 2.8)
Camp County Rural No 199.9 (163.0, 243.8) 43 (5, 192) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Dallam County Rural No 199.3 (137.6, 279.9) 47 (1, 225) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.4)
Fisher County Rural No 215.7 (153.7, 299.3) 19 (1, 218) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.1)
Hill County Rural No 202.4 (183.4, 223.2) 36 (11, 117) 91 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Jasper County Rural No 204.5 (183.9, 227.1) 34 (9, 121) 79 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Leon County Rural No 202.3 (174.4, 234.4) 37 (6, 162) 44 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Moore County Rural No 171.9 (136.9, 214.6) 120 (9, 221) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Parmer County Rural No 161.2 (119.9, 217.8) 147 (9, 225) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.2)
Upshur County Urban No 196.9 (179.1, 216.2) 54 (13, 129) 96 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 3.9)
Hardeman County Rural No 167.7 (116.5, 239.7) 132 (4, 226) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.5)
Motley County Rural No 166.2 (88.0, 314.9) 136 (1, 227) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.1, 3.9)
Runnels County Rural No 205.3 (168.0, 250.2) 32 (4, 189) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
San Jacinto County Urban No 201.6 (179.5, 226.3) 41 (8, 136) 70 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Trinity County Rural No 221.8 (192.6, 255.4) 13 (3, 113) 48 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Bowie County Urban No 184.8 (172.1, 198.3) 79 (36, 139) 164 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 4.8)
Gray County Rural No 192.9 (166.7, 222.6) 60 (9, 178) 41 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.3)
Knox County Rural No 176.5 (119.1, 259.6) 102 (2, 226) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.2)
Bosque County Urban No 212.0 (187.3, 240.1) 23 (5, 117) 61 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.0)
Delta County Rural No 186.4 (144.8, 238.8) 73 (6, 218) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.6)
Floyd County Rural No 181.2 (125.1, 263.5) 86 (2, 225) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 2.7)
Franklin County Rural No 175.6 (144.1, 213.2) 106 (9, 213) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 3.2)
Kaufman County Urban No 188.1 (176.1, 200.8) 69 (31, 122) 193 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.4)
Mitchell County Rural No 206.7 (158.0, 267.5) 30 (2, 214) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.4)
Hockley County Urban No 199.5 (168.5, 235.5) 45 (6, 186) 31 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.8)
Martin County Urban No 197.6 (134.5, 281.7) 51 (1, 224) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.1)
Shelby County Rural No 210.9 (185.2, 239.7) 24 (6, 130) 51 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Terry County Rural No 175.5 (132.6, 229.5) 107 (6, 223) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.7)
McLennan County Urban No 160.4 (152.7, 168.4) 149 (105, 182) 345 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 3.0)
San Augustine County Rural No 197.8 (159.4, 245.3) 50 (5, 199) 23 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Swisher County Rural No 172.9 (127.4, 234.0) 118 (5, 224) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Wichita County Urban No 199.6 (188.0, 211.8) 44 (19, 94) 234 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 4.0)
Calhoun County Rural No 209.8 (178.1, 247.0) 26 (4, 161) 36 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2)
Dimmit County Rural No 214.7 (120.3, 367.9) 20 (1, 227) 3 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.9, 4.7)
Bee County Rural No 176.3 (144.5, 214.0) 103 (9, 213) 22 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.3)
Coleman County Rural No 236.3 (197.1, 283.4) 8 (1, 128) 28 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.2)
Lubbock County Urban No 157.8 (150.2, 165.7) 155 (113, 187) 340 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 4.8)
Reagan County Rural No 244.1 (131.0, 427.9) 7 (1, 227) 3 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.9, 5.4)
Crosby County Urban No 186.7 (130.2, 269.1) 72 (2, 225) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.8)
Hamilton County Rural No 228.0 (190.3, 272.7) 11 (2, 131) 30 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3)
Yoakum County Rural No 146.3 (97.1, 216.4) 189 (8, 227) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.2, 4.2)
Bexar County Urban No 150.8 (147.0, 154.8) 174 (145, 189) 1,209 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 2.3)
Crane County Rural No 284.9 (181.0, 433.6) 3 (1, 215) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.9, 3.9)
Real County Rural No 262.0 (186.6, 369.2) 6 (1, 192) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 3.0)
Wheeler County Rural No 202.8 (152.7, 267.7) 35 (2, 216) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.8)
Hansford County Rural No 220.0 (162.5, 296.4) 15 (1, 213) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.6)
Polk County Rural No 280.4 (256.2, 306.4) 4 (1, 15) 135 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.6, 7.1)
Reeves County Rural No 295.5 (182.4, 453.8) 2 (1, 217) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 4.0)
Rusk County Urban No 180.6 (164.0, 198.7) 90 (31, 164) 91 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 6.9)
Crockett County Rural No 318.8 (194.8, 505.0) 1 (1, 219) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.5, 6.1)
Wood County Rural No 193.0 (178.2, 209.1) 59 (21, 128) 148 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.3, 11.1)
Johnson County Urban No 183.7 (174.4, 193.4) 81 (45, 130) 307 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.9, 6.1)
Nueces County Urban No 165.2 (156.5, 174.3) 138 (90, 174) 290 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.2, 7.8)
Hardin County Urban No 169.1 (155.0, 184.1) 129 (56, 182) 112 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.8, 8.4)
Pecos County Rural No 232.7 (174.3, 306.8) 9 (1, 203) 11 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.2, 19.5)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 210.2 (188.5, 234.2) 25 (7, 110) 76 rising rising trend 5.9 (0.3, 12.6)
Angelina County Rural No 176.0 (162.7, 190.1) 104 (46, 168) 140 stable stable trend 6.1 (-0.2, 9.8)
Howard County Rural No 209.4 (182.4, 239.8) 27 (6, 143) 45 stable stable trend 11.2 (-0.9, 20.0)
Cameron County Urban No 153.1 (139.5, 167.9) 166 (98, 207) 138 rising rising trend 12.9 (4.8, 19.9)
Hall County Rural No 144.4 (94.8, 229.0) 195 (7, 227) 5 rising rising trend 20.7 (0.7, 40.0)
Armstrong County Urban No 156.7 (94.2, 253.6) 157 (3, 227) 4
*
*
Briscoe County Rural No 150.5 (82.6, 276.4) 175 (2, 227) 3
*
*
Cochran County Urban No 220.9 (120.2, 384.5) 14 (1, 227) 3
*
*
Duval County Rural No 148.0 (80.3, 256.4) 182 (2, 227) 3
*
*
Hemphill County Rural No 146.2 (85.5, 236.1) 191 (3, 227) 4
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural Yes 120.1 (67.3, 370.9) 219 (1, 227) 4
*
*
Oldham County Urban No 232.2 (132.5, 381.6) 10 (1, 226) 3
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maverick County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starr County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 11:25 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top