Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for West Virginia by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia N/A No 177.9 (175.5, 180.2) N/A 4,689 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 253.5 (227.1, 282.3) 1 (1, 6) 73 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Pleasants County Rural No 230.2 (189.1, 278.3) 2 (1, 43) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
McDowell County Rural No 214.9 (190.7, 241.9) 3 (1, 33) 61 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Clay County Urban No 212.6 (176.6, 254.8) 4 (1, 48) 26 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Fayette County Urban No 209.1 (192.9, 226.6) 5 (2, 26) 132 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Lewis County Rural No 207.7 (182.8, 235.5) 6 (1, 39) 53 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Mingo County Rural No 203.9 (181.6, 228.4) 7 (1, 39) 67 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Gilmer County Rural No 203.7 (165.9, 248.7) 8 (1, 52) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Mason County Rural No 203.4 (183.5, 225.1) 9 (2, 36) 81 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Wetzel County Rural No 200.3 (174.7, 229.2) 10 (1, 46) 47 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Barbour County Rural No 199.5 (173.4, 228.9) 11 (1, 48) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Harrison County Rural No 198.5 (185.8, 212.0) 12 (3, 30) 190 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Boone County Urban No 197.1 (175.4, 221.0) 13 (2, 45) 65 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Logan County Rural No 196.4 (178.6, 215.7) 14 (2, 41) 97 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Roane County Rural No 195.7 (169.2, 225.8) 15 (2, 49) 42 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Berkeley County Urban No 192.9 (182.3, 204.0) 16 (5, 34) 271 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Wyoming County Rural No 192.3 (170.0, 217.0) 17 (2, 48) 60 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Calhoun County Rural No 190.3 (152.7, 236.1) 18 (1, 54) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Morgan County Urban No 188.8 (165.8, 214.7) 19 (2, 49) 55 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Marion County Rural No 187.8 (174.1, 202.2) 20 (5, 43) 148 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Pocahontas County Rural No 187.1 (154.9, 225.4) 21 (2, 54) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.6)
Pendleton County Rural No 184.9 (149.9, 227.8) 22 (2, 55) 22 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.1)
Greenbrier County Rural No 184.2 (167.9, 201.9) 23 (5, 47) 101 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Mercer County Rural No 184.1 (171.4, 197.5) 24 (8, 43) 168 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Wayne County Urban No 184.0 (168.5, 200.6) 25 (6, 47) 111 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 4.0)
Jefferson County Urban No 182.9 (168.9, 197.7) 26 (8, 46) 136 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Ritchie County Rural No 182.2 (150.2, 220.1) 27 (2, 54) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Wood County Urban No 181.7 (171.1, 193.0) 28 (11, 43) 228 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Taylor County Rural No 181.2 (157.8, 207.5) 29 (3, 52) 45 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 1.6)
Tucker County Rural No 181.1 (147.6, 222.1) 30 (2, 55) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Randolph County Rural No 180.6 (162.7, 200.2) 31 (6, 51) 79 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.4, 8.2)
Cabell County Urban No 179.7 (169.3, 190.7) 32 (13, 45) 234 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Hampshire County Urban No 176.5 (157.5, 197.6) 33 (7, 52) 68 stable stable trend -1.4 (-7.5, 0.3)
Jackson County Rural No 173.3 (155.7, 192.5) 34 (11, 52) 74 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Upshur County Rural No 172.7 (153.4, 194.1) 35 (9, 53) 61 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Monroe County Rural No 171.7 (146.9, 200.2) 36 (5, 54) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Wirt County Urban No 171.2 (132.9, 219.3) 37 (2, 55) 14 falling falling trend -3.6 (-14.4, -1.8)
Hancock County Urban No 171.2 (154.6, 189.4) 38 (12, 52) 84 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Braxton County Rural No 171.2 (146.4, 199.7) 39 (5, 54) 36 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Summers County Rural No 170.5 (145.1, 199.9) 40 (5, 55) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Raleigh County Urban No 168.6 (157.7, 180.2) 41 (22, 51) 187 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Kanawha County Urban No 168.1 (161.0, 175.3) 42 (27, 49) 462 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Mineral County Rural No 165.8 (148.5, 184.9) 43 (14, 54) 71 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Ohio County Urban No 164.4 (150.3, 179.6) 44 (22, 53) 109 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Marshall County Urban No 163.8 (147.6, 181.6) 45 (18, 54) 81 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Nicholas County Rural No 163.3 (145.3, 183.2) 46 (16, 54) 64 falling falling trend -2.0 (-6.6, -1.1)
Webster County Rural No 159.3 (129.8, 194.7) 47 (6, 55) 22 falling falling trend -5.7 (-14.3, -2.8)
Hardy County Rural No 159.2 (135.7, 186.2) 48 (12, 55) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Grant County Rural No 159.0 (133.4, 188.9) 49 (11, 55) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Brooke County Urban No 157.9 (139.7, 178.3) 50 (19, 55) 59 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Preston County Urban No 151.3 (135.8, 168.3) 51 (31, 55) 73 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Putnam County Urban No 149.5 (137.4, 162.5) 52 (38, 55) 117 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Doddridge County Rural No 148.7 (119.3, 184.7) 53 (11, 55) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Tyler County Rural No 140.2 (114.2, 172.0) 54 (25, 55) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.1, -0.1)
Monongalia County Urban No 133.5 (123.5, 144.1) 55 (50, 55) 139 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.3, 1.6)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 3:46 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top