Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 141.4 (140.2, 142.7) N/A 10,162 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Aitkin County Rural No 150.0 (130.5, 172.8) 42 (7, 84) 53 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 3.7)
Anoka County Urban No 141.2 (136.0, 146.5) 64 (40, 74) 587 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Becker County Rural No 140.6 (126.4, 156.3) 67 (21, 86) 76 falling falling trend -2.6 (-8.8, -1.3)
Beltrami County Rural No 143.5 (129.5, 158.6) 56 (17, 83) 81 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Benton County Urban No 153.3 (137.4, 170.6) 39 (7, 79) 70 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Big Stone County Rural No 187.8 (146.5, 239.0) 6 (1, 82) 17 stable stable trend 5.4 (-3.0, 21.3)
Blue Earth County Urban No 141.0 (129.1, 153.8) 65 (23, 83) 106 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Brown County Rural No 169.9 (151.6, 189.9) 14 (2, 63) 70 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Carlton County Urban No 168.6 (152.6, 186.0) 15 (3, 58) 84 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Carver County Urban Yes 119.3 (110.3, 128.9) 85 (70, 87) 135 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Cass County Rural No 154.8 (139.4, 171.8) 37 (7, 76) 84 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Chippewa County Rural No 166.1 (140.6, 195.4) 18 (1, 82) 33 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Chisago County Urban No 166.5 (153.0, 180.9) 17 (5, 53) 118 stable stable trend -7.6 (-13.2, 0.7)
Clay County Urban No 141.8 (129.5, 155.0) 62 (21, 83) 100 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Clearwater County Rural No 177.0 (144.7, 215.0) 8 (1, 80) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Cook County Rural Yes 105.6 (78.8, 141.8) 87 (33, 87) 12 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.5)
Cottonwood County Rural No 155.8 (131.5, 184.0) 33 (3, 85) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Crow Wing County Rural No 147.0 (136.7, 158.0) 48 (19, 76) 165 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.5)
Dakota County Urban No 130.5 (126.0, 135.1) 79 (63, 84) 666 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Dodge County Urban No 133.2 (113.3, 155.7) 75 (16, 87) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Douglas County Rural No 137.5 (124.9, 151.2) 72 (25, 85) 94 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Faribault County Rural No 171.8 (148.4, 198.6) 11 (1, 71) 41 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Fillmore County Urban No 164.1 (145.0, 185.5) 19 (2, 70) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Freeborn County Rural No 143.7 (128.7, 160.2) 53 (14, 84) 73 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Goodhue County Rural No 160.0 (146.8, 174.3) 26 (7, 65) 113 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Grant County Rural No 176.7 (139.4, 222.1) 9 (1, 85) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Hennepin County Urban No 133.2 (130.5, 136.0) 74 (61, 80) 1,929 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Houston County Urban No 145.1 (125.5, 167.2) 52 (8, 86) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Hubbard County Rural No 141.9 (125.0, 160.9) 61 (15, 85) 56 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Isanti County Urban No 155.6 (140.7, 171.9) 34 (8, 75) 82 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Itasca County Rural No 157.2 (144.5, 171.0) 31 (9, 68) 123 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Jackson County Rural Yes 122.1 (98.5, 150.5) 84 (17, 87) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Kanabec County Rural No 160.3 (138.4, 185.2) 24 (2, 79) 40 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 142.2 (128.7, 156.7) 60 (20, 83) 88 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Kittson County Rural No 184.0 (140.8, 239.0) 7 (1, 86) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
Koochiching County Rural No 138.9 (118.1, 163.4) 69 (11, 87) 33 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 138.8 (109.7, 175.0) 71 (4, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Lake County Rural No 155.4 (130.7, 184.5) 36 (2, 85) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Lake of the Woods County Rural No 141.6 (101.6, 195.6) 63 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Le Sueur County Urban No 161.0 (143.3, 180.6) 21 (4, 74) 62 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 4.7)
Lincoln County Rural No 154.0 (119.4, 197.1) 38 (1, 87) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Lyon County Rural No 155.5 (136.5, 176.5) 35 (5, 81) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Mahnomen County Rural No 200.9 (155.3, 256.7) 1 (1, 78) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Marshall County Rural No 141.0 (114.1, 173.3) 66 (5, 87) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 4.5)
Martin County Rural No 148.9 (130.5, 169.7) 45 (10, 84) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
McLeod County Rural No 140.2 (126.3, 155.4) 68 (19, 85) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Meeker County Rural No 149.8 (132.1, 169.5) 43 (7, 83) 54 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 191.5 (171.5, 213.4) 3 (1, 28) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Morrison County Rural No 157.4 (141.8, 174.3) 30 (6, 73) 80 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Mower County Rural No 142.8 (128.8, 158.0) 58 (18, 84) 80 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Murray County Rural No 126.4 (102.3, 156.2) 81 (12, 87) 20 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.5)
Nicollet County Urban No 123.0 (108.6, 138.9) 83 (46, 87) 55 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4)
Nobles County Rural No 148.0 (128.0, 170.3) 47 (7, 85) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Norman County Rural No 195.4 (157.9, 240.4) 2 (1, 74) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Olmsted County Urban No 126.3 (119.4, 133.6) 82 (62, 86) 256 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 3.7)
Otter Tail County Rural No 143.7 (133.0, 155.2) 54 (24, 80) 150 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Pennington County Rural No 175.5 (149.3, 205.3) 10 (1, 72) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Pine County Rural No 169.9 (153.2, 188.3) 13 (2, 59) 79 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Pipestone County Rural No 191.2 (159.8, 227.7) 4 (1, 66) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Polk County Urban No 160.7 (144.0, 178.9) 22 (5, 72) 71 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Pope County Rural No 151.7 (126.6, 181.2) 41 (3, 86) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Ramsey County Urban No 142.6 (138.4, 147.0) 59 (40, 71) 898 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.0)
Red Lake County Rural No 159.1 (116.2, 214.9) 28 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.7)
Redwood County Rural No 142.9 (121.6, 167.2) 57 (8, 87) 34 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Renville County Rural No 159.4 (136.2, 185.8) 27 (2, 82) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Rice County Rural No 143.6 (132.0, 156.1) 55 (22, 81) 116 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Rock County Urban No 152.9 (125.3, 185.5) 40 (2, 87) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Roseau County Rural No 131.3 (110.6, 155.2) 78 (16, 87) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.4)
Scott County Urban No 127.2 (118.9, 135.9) 80 (59, 86) 184 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Sherburne County Urban No 161.9 (150.1, 174.4) 20 (7, 59) 150 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Sibley County Rural No 146.0 (123.1, 172.3) 49 (5, 87) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
St. Louis County Urban No 148.6 (142.3, 155.1) 46 (25, 66) 445 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Stearns County Urban No 145.6 (137.9, 153.8) 51 (26, 73) 272 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.6)
Steele County Rural No 138.9 (124.7, 154.3) 70 (23, 85) 73 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Stevens County Rural No 134.1 (104.9, 169.2) 73 (6, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Swift County Rural Yes 117.8 (94.4, 146.1) 86 (22, 87) 19 falling falling trend -14.5 (-28.5, -2.0)
Todd County Rural No 131.4 (115.2, 149.4) 77 (21, 87) 53 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.1)
Traverse County Rural No 171.4 (127.2, 230.0) 12 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.6)
Wabasha County Urban No 155.9 (137.5, 176.5) 32 (5, 79) 55 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Wadena County Rural No 189.2 (163.5, 218.2) 5 (1, 45) 41 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Waseca County Rural No 160.1 (138.6, 184.1) 25 (3, 81) 42 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Washington County Urban No 131.9 (126.2, 137.7) 76 (56, 83) 430 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Watonwan County Rural No 160.4 (133.3, 192.0) 23 (1, 85) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.6)
Wilkin County Rural No 158.5 (123.6, 201.4) 29 (1, 87) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.0)
Winona County Rural No 145.8 (132.6, 160.0) 50 (16, 82) 95 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Wright County Urban No 149.6 (140.8, 158.9) 44 (19, 70) 222 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 167.6 (137.4, 203.1) 16 (1, 85) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 4:58 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top