Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A No 157.4 (156.5, 158.4) N/A 21,049 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Mecosta County Rural No 174.8 (159.1, 191.8) 23 (3, 68) 98 falling falling trend -9.4 (-15.3, -1.7)
Manistee County Rural No 163.5 (146.6, 182.2) 46 (7, 77) 76 falling falling trend -5.9 (-9.2, -2.0)
Cass County Urban No 170.4 (157.4, 184.4) 32 (6, 70) 136 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.8, -1.6)
Gogebic County Rural No 142.1 (121.7, 165.8) 75 (21, 83) 39 falling falling trend -4.0 (-12.5, -2.4)
Wexford County Rural No 161.8 (145.7, 179.4) 51 (10, 78) 79 stable stable trend -2.8 (-9.3, 4.7)
Mackinac County Rural No 148.5 (125.7, 175.7) 69 (9, 83) 33 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.1)
Wayne County Urban No 162.8 (160.4, 165.3) 49 (34, 57) 3,514 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Keweenaw County Rural No 136.0 (89.8, 210.2) 80 (1, 83) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.8)
Luce County Rural No 171.4 (137.5, 212.9) 31 (1, 83) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Van Buren County Rural No 163.1 (152.0, 175.0) 47 (15, 73) 171 falling falling trend -1.7 (-7.1, -0.9)
Clinton County Urban No 129.8 (120.1, 140.2) 82 (69, 83) 137 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Oakland County Urban No 136.3 (133.8, 138.8) 79 (72, 82) 2,311 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Washtenaw County Urban No 133.0 (128.0, 138.2) 81 (73, 83) 548 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Barry County Urban No 153.3 (141.3, 166.1) 63 (25, 80) 129 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Benzie County Urban No 143.4 (124.0, 165.5) 73 (20, 83) 46 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Dickinson County Rural No 139.4 (123.7, 156.9) 77 (36, 83) 61 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Iron County Rural No 164.8 (139.6, 194.4) 41 (2, 82) 38 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.2)
Livingston County Urban No 146.1 (139.5, 153.1) 71 (54, 79) 388 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Arenac County Rural No 173.4 (149.6, 200.6) 25 (1, 79) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Genesee County Urban No 166.8 (161.9, 171.9) 38 (21, 55) 916 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
St. Joseph County Rural No 160.9 (148.6, 174.0) 53 (14, 75) 132 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Eaton County Urban No 151.7 (142.8, 160.9) 67 (37, 77) 233 falling falling trend -1.2 (-4.4, -0.7)
Kalamazoo County Urban No 155.0 (148.7, 161.5) 61 (39, 73) 472 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Lapeer County Urban No 156.8 (146.8, 167.4) 58 (24, 75) 199 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Monroe County Urban No 167.0 (159.2, 175.1) 36 (16, 63) 364 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Antrim County Rural No 146.7 (130.0, 165.3) 70 (21, 83) 64 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Leelanau County Urban Yes 118.0 (103.8, 134.3) 83 (72, 83) 58 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Macomb County Urban No 159.7 (156.4, 163.0) 54 (38, 64) 1,876 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Marquette County Rural No 151.3 (139.9, 163.4) 68 (27, 80) 140 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Newaygo County Rural No 175.1 (161.2, 190.1) 21 (4, 64) 125 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Otsego County Rural No 151.8 (134.4, 171.0) 66 (14, 82) 59 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
St. Clair County Urban No 169.0 (161.4, 176.9) 34 (15, 59) 394 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Bay County Urban No 168.6 (159.4, 178.4) 35 (13, 62) 264 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Berrien County Urban No 159.6 (152.2, 167.3) 55 (25, 71) 367 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Branch County Rural No 157.5 (143.5, 172.7) 57 (15, 78) 97 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Jackson County Urban No 172.5 (164.6, 180.7) 28 (11, 52) 380 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Kent County Urban No 152.1 (148.0, 156.2) 65 (51, 74) 1,087 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Ogemaw County Rural No 184.4 (164.2, 207.0) 11 (1, 65) 70 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Tuscola County Rural No 170.1 (157.3, 183.8) 33 (8, 67) 139 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Alger County Rural No 139.8 (113.5, 171.9) 76 (11, 83) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Allegan County Rural No 163.9 (154.7, 173.6) 43 (16, 69) 253 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Grand Traverse County Urban No 142.5 (133.6, 151.9) 74 (55, 82) 202 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Lenawee County Rural No 161.2 (151.6, 171.3) 52 (18, 72) 224 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Ontonagon County Rural No 145.9 (120.1, 181.2) 72 (9, 83) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.0)
Charlevoix County Rural No 155.7 (139.2, 174.1) 59 (12, 81) 72 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Emmet County Rural No 155.2 (140.4, 171.5) 60 (17, 81) 87 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Huron County Rural No 164.6 (149.4, 181.3) 42 (7, 74) 95 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Ionia County Urban No 163.7 (150.7, 177.5) 44 (13, 75) 124 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Isabella County Rural No 183.2 (168.2, 199.3) 12 (2, 54) 115 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Montcalm County Urban No 174.8 (162.4, 187.9) 22 (5, 63) 155 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Muskegon County Urban No 175.3 (167.5, 183.4) 20 (9, 49) 402 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Shiawassee County Rural No 167.0 (155.3, 179.4) 37 (10, 69) 161 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Calhoun County Urban No 181.9 (172.9, 191.2) 14 (5, 38) 326 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Cheboygan County Rural No 165.6 (148.7, 184.4) 39 (6, 77) 79 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Clare County Rural No 196.8 (179.2, 216.0) 6 (1, 34) 102 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Delta County Rural No 165.2 (150.8, 180.9) 40 (8, 74) 107 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Ingham County Urban No 158.5 (152.1, 165.1) 56 (31, 71) 479 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.5)
Missaukee County Rural No 172.3 (148.1, 199.9) 29 (1, 79) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Osceola County Rural No 179.7 (159.8, 201.7) 16 (1, 69) 63 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Ottawa County Urban No 139.2 (133.6, 144.9) 78 (67, 82) 494 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Schoolcraft County Rural No 177.2 (147.6, 212.9) 19 (1, 81) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Houghton County Rural No 172.5 (155.7, 190.9) 27 (4, 72) 81 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Montmorency County Rural No 198.6 (168.6, 234.1) 4 (1, 65) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Alpena County Rural No 179.6 (162.8, 198.1) 17 (2, 66) 91 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Kalkaska County Urban No 207.5 (182.8, 235.0) 1 (1, 35) 56 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Lake County Rural No 197.0 (170.1, 227.9) 5 (1, 66) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Sanilac County Rural No 172.0 (157.4, 187.7) 30 (6, 69) 112 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Gladwin County Rural No 182.5 (164.3, 202.6) 13 (1, 65) 85 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Hillsdale County Rural No 180.4 (166.0, 195.9) 15 (3, 55) 123 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Menominee County Rural No 163.5 (146.0, 183.1) 45 (7, 78) 69 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Mason County Rural No 177.4 (160.0, 196.5) 18 (2, 67) 86 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 5.1)
Presque Isle County Rural No 152.1 (130.1, 178.0) 64 (8, 83) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 5.6)
Gratiot County Rural No 174.3 (158.7, 191.0) 24 (4, 69) 95 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Crawford County Rural No 192.0 (167.1, 220.4) 8 (1, 63) 48 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Oceana County Rural No 163.0 (145.3, 182.6) 48 (7, 79) 66 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Alcona County Rural No 188.9 (161.4, 221.7) 9 (1, 71) 44 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Baraga County Rural No 173.0 (142.3, 209.7) 26 (1, 82) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Iosco County Rural No 203.7 (184.1, 225.2) 3 (1, 27) 98 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Roscommon County Rural No 195.8 (176.3, 217.6) 7 (1, 46) 95 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Chippewa County Rural No 188.6 (171.6, 207.0) 10 (1, 52) 94 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Oscoda County Rural No 205.4 (173.3, 243.3) 2 (1, 64) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Saginaw County Urban No 162.3 (155.5, 169.5) 50 (24, 66) 444 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.4, 4.2)
Midland County Urban No 154.9 (145.0, 165.4) 62 (28, 77) 190 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.7, 4.1)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 12:49 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top