Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi N/A No 179.0 (177.0, 181.0) N/A 6,594 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Franklin County Rural No 146.1 (116.3, 182.4) 78 (22, 82) 17 falling falling trend -12.8 (-23.5, -1.4)
Calhoun County Rural No 173.2 (146.5, 203.8) 58 (12, 82) 31 falling falling trend -6.0 (-15.1, -2.2)
Madison County Urban No 181.5 (170.7, 192.8) 43 (23, 67) 223 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.6, -4.7)
Clarke County Rural No 151.8 (130.1, 176.6) 73 (33, 82) 36 falling falling trend -4.0 (-12.8, -1.2)
Leake County Rural No 179.8 (157.6, 204.4) 45 (10, 77) 49 falling falling trend -2.8 (-8.3, -1.6)
Lee County Rural No 201.5 (188.8, 214.8) 18 (9, 49) 195 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -1.5)
Smith County Rural No 166.7 (142.8, 194.0) 66 (16, 82) 36 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.7)
Amite County Rural No 142.9 (121.1, 168.4) 79 (45, 82) 33 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Stone County Urban No 179.5 (154.3, 207.8) 47 (9, 79) 40 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.7)
Benton County Urban No 171.6 (136.3, 214.0) 62 (6, 82) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Lamar County Urban No 136.8 (124.9, 149.6) 81 (69, 82) 100 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Rankin County Urban No 132.3 (125.1, 139.8) 82 (75, 82) 258 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.5, -0.5)
Alcorn County Rural No 161.3 (145.1, 178.8) 71 (32, 80) 76 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Perry County Urban No 190.2 (160.4, 224.3) 34 (5, 78) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Greene County Rural No 151.7 (125.8, 181.5) 74 (28, 82) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Wilkinson County Rural No 183.7 (149.7, 224.0) 40 (4, 82) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Lafayette County Rural No 148.9 (134.3, 164.7) 76 (54, 82) 81 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Marion County Rural No 179.5 (159.3, 201.8) 46 (11, 76) 60 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Webster County Rural No 190.6 (158.2, 228.3) 33 (3, 80) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Yalobusha County Rural No 200.4 (172.2, 232.6) 21 (3, 73) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-4.8, -0.4)
Harrison County Urban No 185.4 (177.8, 193.3) 39 (23, 58) 467 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Jefferson Davis County Rural No 165.9 (138.4, 197.9) 67 (13, 82) 29 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Clay County Rural No 163.0 (141.1, 187.7) 68 (22, 82) 42 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
DeSoto County Urban No 178.0 (169.4, 186.9) 52 (31, 68) 340 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Grenada County Rural No 204.0 (180.8, 229.6) 17 (4, 64) 58 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Jones County Rural No 166.9 (154.6, 180.0) 65 (34, 76) 143 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Winston County Rural No 176.4 (153.2, 202.4) 56 (13, 80) 44 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Jackson County Urban No 178.4 (169.6, 187.7) 50 (29, 67) 320 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Lauderdale County Rural No 149.3 (138.4, 160.9) 75 (61, 82) 145 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 3.5)
Oktibbeha County Rural No 154.8 (138.8, 172.2) 72 (43, 82) 71 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Pike County Rural No 176.7 (160.3, 194.4) 54 (19, 75) 90 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
Carroll County Rural No 180.4 (150.9, 214.9) 44 (7, 80) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Jefferson County Rural No 193.7 (154.7, 240.1) 31 (2, 81) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Lincoln County Rural No 186.7 (168.8, 206.1) 36 (11, 71) 83 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 162.1 (134.3, 194.9) 69 (12, 82) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Panola County Rural No 196.1 (177.3, 216.4) 26 (6, 64) 84 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Pearl River County Rural No 196.3 (182.3, 211.3) 24 (10, 57) 154 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Warren County Rural No 186.6 (170.6, 203.8) 37 (13, 68) 107 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Washington County Rural No 216.5 (198.9, 235.4) 13 (3, 38) 120 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Chickasaw County Rural No 174.6 (151.0, 201.2) 57 (12, 80) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Copiah County Urban No 172.1 (153.3, 192.8) 59 (19, 79) 65 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Forrest County Urban No 183.2 (170.1, 197.1) 41 (18, 68) 150 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Hancock County Urban No 172.0 (158.1, 187.1) 60 (26, 75) 121 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Kemper County Rural No 146.4 (117.2, 181.5) 77 (23, 82) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.6)
Simpson County Urban No 162.1 (143.3, 182.9) 70 (29, 81) 57 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
George County Rural No 210.2 (184.5, 238.5) 16 (2, 59) 55 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Holmes County Urban No 246.4 (215.8, 280.3) 5 (1, 29) 49 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Walthall County Rural No 169.2 (144.2, 197.7) 64 (14, 82) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Bolivar County Rural No 224.7 (203.0, 248.1) 8 (2, 35) 83 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 2.9)
Lawrence County Rural No 196.3 (165.6, 231.5) 25 (3, 77) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Newton County Rural No 170.4 (148.7, 194.7) 63 (17, 81) 45 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Scott County Urban No 179.2 (159.0, 201.4) 48 (14, 76) 59 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Tate County Urban No 199.1 (177.8, 222.3) 23 (6, 68) 68 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Claiborne County Rural No 178.4 (143.6, 219.6) 51 (4, 82) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Coahoma County Rural No 235.8 (209.3, 265.0) 7 (1, 32) 61 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Monroe County Rural No 183.0 (165.9, 201.5) 42 (14, 73) 89 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Sunflower County Rural No 217.8 (193.8, 244.0) 11 (2, 51) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Adams County Rural No 195.2 (176.5, 215.6) 29 (7, 64) 87 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Wayne County Rural No 194.5 (170.3, 221.5) 30 (5, 72) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Choctaw County Rural No 140.1 (112.4, 173.7) 80 (28, 82) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Jasper County Rural No 195.7 (169.9, 224.7) 27 (5, 72) 45 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Lowndes County Rural No 189.6 (175.3, 204.8) 35 (12, 64) 137 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Tallahatchie County Rural No 195.4 (165.3, 229.8) 28 (3, 76) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Tippah County Rural No 177.2 (155.2, 201.6) 53 (12, 77) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Covington County Rural No 201.2 (175.8, 229.5) 20 (4, 68) 47 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Hinds County Urban No 171.9 (164.6, 179.3) 61 (39, 71) 451 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Attala County Rural No 200.1 (175.6, 227.5) 22 (4, 67) 50 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Quitman County Rural No 250.3 (200.9, 308.9) 4 (1, 57) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.3)
Sharkey County Rural No 220.6 (165.5, 290.2) 9 (1, 81) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.2)
Tunica County Urban No 259.5 (212.5, 313.7) 2 (1, 41) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Union County Rural No 192.5 (172.2, 214.7) 32 (7, 69) 67 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Marshall County Urban No 218.8 (199.5, 239.6) 10 (3, 37) 101 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 3.9)
Noxubee County Rural No 178.7 (146.0, 216.8) 49 (6, 82) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Prentiss County Rural No 185.6 (165.0, 208.2) 38 (11, 74) 61 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.2)
Yazoo County Urban No 217.3 (193.6, 243.2) 12 (2, 48) 63 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Leflore County Rural No 240.2 (215.9, 266.6) 6 (1, 24) 75 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.3)
Tishomingo County Rural No 211.6 (187.8, 237.9) 15 (3, 58) 60 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Pontotoc County Rural No 211.8 (190.6, 234.8) 14 (4, 52) 76 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.9)
Neshoba County Rural No 201.4 (180.4, 224.2) 19 (6, 62) 70 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Issaquena County Rural No 255.4 (148.7, 423.5) 3 (1, 82) 3 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.4, 6.2)
Itawamba County Rural No 176.4 (156.0, 199.0) 55 (14, 78) 55 stable stable trend 4.3 (-1.6, 9.0)
Humphreys County Rural No 269.2 (223.8, 321.7) 1 (1, 31) 27 rising rising trend 19.2 (4.0, 29.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 12:43 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top