Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A No 174.3 (172.6, 176.0) N/A 8,341 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
United States N/A No 145.4 (145.2, 145.6) N/A 605,771 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Greer County Rural No 166.0 (126.7, 214.6) 54 (4, 77) 12 falling falling trend -15.1 (-26.9, -1.5)
Creek County Urban No 185.7 (173.6, 198.4) 34 (18, 56) 185 falling falling trend -7.4 (-10.8, -4.2)
Jackson County Rural No 165.1 (144.5, 187.9) 56 (23, 76) 47 falling falling trend -2.7 (-11.1, -0.7)
Harper County Rural No 140.7 (97.2, 200.1) 75 (7, 77) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.7, -0.1)
Harmon County Rural No 162.5 (105.0, 242.6) 59 (1, 77) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 0.4)
Cleveland County Urban No 145.1 (139.2, 151.2) 72 (61, 76) 467 falling falling trend -2.0 (-6.7, -0.8)
Choctaw County Rural No 188.3 (162.4, 217.6) 32 (4, 70) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-7.1, -0.2)
Beaver County Rural No 136.3 (101.2, 181.3) 76 (27, 77) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.4)
Logan County Urban No 146.4 (133.1, 160.8) 70 (50, 77) 93 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Craig County Rural No 173.6 (148.5, 202.2) 47 (11, 75) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Comanche County Urban No 173.0 (162.6, 183.8) 48 (30, 65) 216 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Pawnee County Urban No 177.2 (153.1, 204.5) 43 (10, 73) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Pontotoc County Rural No 159.0 (143.3, 176.0) 63 (35, 75) 78 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Tulsa County Urban No 160.4 (156.3, 164.6) 60 (50, 68) 1,203 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Woodward County Rural No 152.3 (131.2, 175.9) 66 (32, 77) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Wagoner County Urban No 152.1 (141.5, 163.3) 68 (48, 76) 161 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Canadian County Urban No 148.3 (139.9, 157.1) 69 (55, 76) 243 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.4)
Delaware County Rural No 158.6 (145.1, 173.3) 64 (37, 75) 112 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Pushmataha County Rural No 213.5 (183.3, 248.0) 14 (1, 54) 38 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Grady County Urban No 168.4 (154.8, 182.9) 50 (30, 71) 119 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Murray County Rural No 177.2 (151.8, 206.1) 44 (9, 74) 36 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.4)
Osage County Urban No 157.0 (143.7, 171.4) 65 (40, 76) 108 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Bryan County Rural No 179.9 (164.7, 196.2) 41 (18, 63) 107 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Kingfisher County Rural No 159.4 (134.6, 187.6) 62 (22, 77) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Lincoln County Urban No 183.6 (166.5, 202.1) 37 (15, 65) 88 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Washita County Rural No 142.6 (115.9, 174.1) 74 (33, 77) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Latimer County Rural No 166.8 (138.7, 199.8) 53 (13, 77) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
McClain County Urban No 163.9 (148.0, 181.2) 58 (30, 75) 81 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.4)
Noble County Rural No 164.3 (137.7, 195.3) 57 (16, 77) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Garfield County Urban No 174.4 (161.1, 188.5) 45 (26, 66) 134 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Oklahoma County Urban No 172.9 (168.8, 176.9) 49 (38, 57) 1,466 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Adair County Rural No 212.2 (186.4, 240.8) 17 (1, 51) 50 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Cimarron County Rural No 133.9 (83.8, 208.0) 77 (4, 77) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.8, 2.9)
Custer County Rural No 168.2 (148.0, 190.5) 51 (21, 74) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Rogers County Urban No 167.1 (156.8, 177.9) 52 (35, 68) 206 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Carter County Rural No 202.3 (186.3, 219.4) 24 (5, 45) 123 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Haskell County Rural No 205.4 (175.7, 239.3) 21 (1, 64) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Johnston County Rural No 199.4 (166.4, 237.4) 25 (1, 70) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Le Flore County Rural No 202.8 (187.1, 219.5) 23 (5, 43) 129 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Stephens County Rural No 184.7 (169.6, 200.9) 35 (15, 61) 118 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Washington County Rural No 174.1 (160.7, 188.4) 46 (26, 67) 132 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Woods County Rural No 152.3 (120.9, 189.8) 67 (15, 77) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2)
Beckham County Rural No 187.5 (164.0, 213.4) 33 (6, 68) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Coal County Rural No 221.8 (176.8, 276.3) 9 (1, 69) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 1.9)
Kay County Rural No 195.2 (179.5, 212.0) 27 (8, 52) 119 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Major County Rural No 143.6 (113.3, 180.5) 73 (22, 77) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Mayes County Rural No 192.0 (175.2, 210.2) 29 (10, 56) 101 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
McIntosh County Rural No 188.9 (168.2, 212.0) 31 (7, 66) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Muskogee County Rural No 207.3 (193.6, 221.9) 19 (5, 37) 175 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Payne County Rural No 177.5 (164.3, 191.5) 42 (24, 63) 139 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Love County Rural No 212.5 (178.7, 251.3) 15 (1, 62) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Ottawa County Rural No 214.9 (194.6, 236.8) 12 (1, 41) 85 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Cherokee County Rural No 194.2 (178.5, 210.9) 28 (9, 53) 119 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Hughes County Rural No 209.9 (180.8, 242.7) 18 (1, 58) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
McCurtain County Rural No 216.9 (196.5, 239.1) 11 (1, 37) 86 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Sequoyah County Urban No 229.9 (211.8, 249.3) 4 (1, 23) 124 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Pittsburg County Rural No 204.8 (189.0, 221.6) 22 (4, 42) 130 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Marshall County Rural No 190.7 (166.8, 217.6) 30 (4, 66) 48 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Okmulgee County Urban No 214.3 (196.1, 233.9) 13 (2, 37) 106 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Seminole County Rural No 217.9 (195.3, 242.7) 10 (1, 39) 70 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Caddo County Rural No 226.6 (203.5, 251.8) 7 (1, 35) 71 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Pottawatomie County Rural No 206.5 (193.2, 220.6) 20 (6, 38) 186 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Roger Mills County Rural No 159.7 (114.6, 219.5) 61 (3, 77) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.7)
Garvin County Rural No 212.3 (190.4, 236.2) 16 (1, 46) 71 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Jefferson County Rural No 229.4 (182.4, 286.1) 5 (1, 66) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Nowata County Rural No 227.0 (191.4, 268.0) 6 (1, 53) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Texas County Rural No 165.6 (140.4, 193.8) 55 (15, 77) 32 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1)
Dewey County Rural No 180.2 (134.7, 237.4) 40 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 8.2)
Kiowa County Rural No 230.8 (193.0, 274.5) 3 (1, 52) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Atoka County Rural No 180.3 (154.2, 209.9) 39 (6, 74) 35 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Cotton County Urban No 196.1 (155.2, 246.0) 26 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.2)
Ellis County Rural No 146.0 (103.1, 202.9) 71 (8, 77) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.0)
Grant County Rural No 231.0 (177.1, 297.6) 2 (1, 69) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 2.9)
Tillman County Rural No 180.3 (144.9, 222.9) 38 (2, 76) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 5.3)
Alfalfa County Rural No 184.1 (144.7, 232.6) 36 (1, 77) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 2.9)
Blaine County Rural No 224.0 (187.4, 266.4) 8 (1, 58) 28 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 10.9)
Okfuskee County Rural No 249.4 (214.5, 288.7) 1 (1, 33) 38 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 12:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top