Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A No 194.4 (192.1, 196.8) N/A 5,616 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -2.0)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Russell County Urban No 259.5 (232.0, 289.3) 1 (1, 24) 73 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Escambia County Rural No 249.0 (219.5, 281.5) 2 (1, 38) 54 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Crenshaw County Rural No 247.1 (199.7, 303.1) 3 (1, 59) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Clarke County Rural No 236.7 (202.4, 275.6) 4 (1, 54) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Chilton County Urban No 236.3 (209.7, 265.4) 5 (1, 46) 62 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Geneva County Urban No 233.9 (202.0, 269.9) 6 (1, 52) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Walker County Urban No 231.4 (210.0, 254.6) 7 (1, 45) 93 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Macon County Urban No 231.0 (190.5, 278.1) 8 (1, 61) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Butler County Rural No 230.7 (192.4, 274.9) 9 (1, 59) 27 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.5, 11.9)
Wilcox County Rural No 229.1 (176.9, 292.9) 10 (1, 65) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.3)
Lawrence County Urban No 228.2 (199.1, 260.7) 11 (1, 54) 49 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.4)
Cleburne County Rural No 227.8 (187.0, 275.8) 12 (1, 63) 23 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.2)
Marion County Rural No 227.4 (198.8, 259.4) 13 (1, 54) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Clay County Rural No 225.8 (185.1, 273.9) 14 (1, 63) 22 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.4)
Barbour County Rural No 225.7 (193.6, 261.9) 15 (1, 58) 37 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Pike County Rural No 224.6 (191.7, 261.7) 16 (1, 60) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Etowah County Urban No 223.4 (206.6, 241.2) 17 (3, 43) 144 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Jackson County Rural No 223.1 (200.7, 247.6) 18 (2, 50) 79 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Chambers County Rural No 222.1 (193.8, 253.6) 19 (1, 56) 48 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Calhoun County Urban No 220.3 (203.7, 238.0) 20 (4, 47) 144 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Covington County Rural No 218.0 (192.9, 245.9) 21 (2, 55) 58 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Henry County Urban No 215.1 (179.6, 256.7) 22 (1, 64) 28 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Lamar County Rural No 215.0 (175.5, 261.9) 23 (1, 65) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
St. Clair County Urban No 213.1 (195.2, 232.3) 24 (5, 52) 114 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Hale County Urban No 212.7 (170.8, 262.6) 25 (1, 65) 20 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.0)
Greene County Urban No 212.6 (158.1, 281.9) 26 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.1, 13.2)
Elmore County Urban No 211.8 (192.7, 232.3) 27 (6, 54) 102 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Talladega County Rural No 211.2 (193.0, 230.8) 28 (6, 56) 108 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Sumter County Rural No 211.0 (160.2, 273.2) 29 (1, 66) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.8)
Marshall County Rural No 210.8 (193.2, 229.7) 30 (7, 54) 114 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Franklin County Rural No 210.0 (180.6, 242.9) 31 (2, 63) 38 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.3)
Winston County Rural No 209.5 (178.7, 244.7) 32 (2, 63) 35 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Colbert County Urban No 209.5 (188.7, 232.2) 33 (5, 58) 78 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Pickens County Urban No 208.2 (173.2, 248.7) 34 (1, 65) 26 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.6, -2.2)
Coosa County Rural No 207.4 (164.5, 260.3) 35 (1, 66) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.5)
Bibb County Urban No 207.2 (173.0, 246.4) 36 (2, 65) 27 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Cherokee County Rural No 206.5 (177.8, 239.1) 37 (3, 63) 42 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Montgomery County Urban No 203.8 (191.8, 216.4) 38 (16, 53) 231 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Dallas County Rural No 202.7 (175.7, 232.9) 39 (4, 64) 45 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Dale County Rural No 202.1 (179.1, 227.5) 40 (7, 62) 59 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.8, 6.5)
Choctaw County Rural No 202.0 (163.1, 249.2) 41 (1, 66) 19 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.2, 11.0)
Mobile County Urban No 202.0 (193.5, 210.8) 42 (22, 51) 463 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
Blount County Urban No 200.0 (179.8, 222.0) 43 (10, 61) 75 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Fayette County Rural No 199.4 (163.0, 242.4) 44 (2, 66) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Houston County Urban No 198.8 (182.9, 215.8) 45 (16, 59) 123 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Jefferson County Urban No 196.8 (190.0, 203.9) 46 (30, 53) 674 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Conecuh County Rural No 195.5 (154.9, 245.1) 47 (1, 67) 17 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Monroe County Rural No 193.7 (159.9, 233.1) 48 (3, 66) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Lowndes County Urban No 192.0 (146.1, 249.0) 49 (1, 67) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.7)
Marengo County Rural No 191.3 (157.6, 230.6) 50 (4, 66) 24 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Lee County Urban No 190.6 (176.2, 205.7) 51 (25, 62) 146 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Randolph County Rural No 190.5 (159.2, 226.8) 52 (5, 66) 29 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Cullman County Rural No 187.9 (171.5, 205.5) 53 (23, 64) 104 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
DeKalb County Rural No 187.3 (168.3, 207.8) 54 (21, 65) 79 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Tallapoosa County Rural No 185.7 (164.2, 209.7) 55 (19, 66) 59 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Morgan County Urban No 182.6 (168.6, 197.4) 56 (33, 64) 135 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Autauga County Urban No 180.0 (159.6, 202.4) 57 (25, 66) 60 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Coffee County Rural No 177.3 (156.3, 200.4) 58 (26, 66) 54 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Lauderdale County Urban No 173.7 (158.6, 190.0) 59 (40, 66) 105 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.1, -3.0)
Baldwin County Urban No 173.5 (164.3, 183.0) 60 (47, 65) 290 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.3, -1.8)
Bullock County Rural No 173.2 (126.3, 231.9) 61 (3, 67) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.4)
Washington County Rural No 171.9 (137.0, 213.9) 62 (11, 67) 17 falling falling trend -8.2 (-20.4, -3.7)
Tuscaloosa County Urban No 167.7 (156.1, 179.9) 63 (49, 66) 174 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.2)
Limestone County Urban No 164.9 (149.9, 180.9) 64 (48, 66) 98 falling falling trend -2.7 (-7.3, -1.5)
Madison County Urban No 163.4 (155.4, 171.7) 65 (55, 66) 336 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Shelby County Urban No 139.4 (129.8, 149.4) 66 (64, 67) 171 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.6)
Perry County Rural No 132.7 (92.1, 187.3) 67 (27, 67) 7 falling falling trend -16.1 (-46.2, -3.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 7:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top