Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas N/A No 179.5 (176.5, 182.5) N/A 2,937 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Kingman County Rural No 367.4 (294.2, 455.0) 1 (1, 14) 19 rising rising trend 10.8 (4.1, 30.8)
Elk County Rural No 359.0 (246.8, 514.3) 2 (1, 52) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.7, 4.0)
Morton County Rural No 330.1 (221.9, 478.9) 3 (1, 66) 6
*
*
Barber County Rural No 299.0 (208.5, 418.0) 4 (1, 70) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.5)
Harper County Rural No 295.1 (219.9, 389.7) 5 (1, 57) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.1)
Edwards County Rural No 287.4 (190.0, 422.7) 6 (1, 85) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 2.7)
Cloud County Rural No 273.9 (213.9, 346.2) 7 (1, 55) 15 rising rising trend 23.0 (0.6, 50.0)
Cherokee County Urban No 264.1 (223.6, 310.4) 8 (2, 34) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Kiowa County Rural No 252.0 (153.2, 397.3) 9 (1, 91) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.7, 5.7)
Crawford County Rural No 250.6 (219.4, 285.2) 10 (3, 34) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Russell County Rural No 240.5 (180.5, 316.2) 11 (2, 77) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)
Republic County Rural No 237.7 (169.5, 328.4) 12 (1, 86) 9 stable stable trend 2.9 (0.0, 5.9)
Trego County Rural No 236.9 (155.6, 356.0) 13 (1, 90) 5 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 5.0)
Labette County Rural No 236.4 (199.7, 278.4) 14 (4, 56) 31 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.4)
Doniphan County Urban No 232.0 (173.9, 304.8) 15 (2, 80) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.4)
Wilson County Rural No 230.9 (177.7, 296.5) 16 (3, 78) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Brown County Rural No 226.9 (175.6, 289.8) 17 (3, 80) 14 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.5, 18.5)
Phillips County Rural No 225.8 (162.8, 309.5) 18 (2, 87) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.7)
Rice County Rural No 223.1 (170.0, 288.1) 19 (3, 83) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.4)
Franklin County Rural No 222.4 (189.2, 260.0) 20 (6, 60) 34 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Cowley County Rural No 218.1 (190.5, 248.7) 21 (8, 59) 46 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Linn County Urban No 215.6 (171.6, 269.5) 22 (5, 80) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.7)
Morris County Rural No 211.6 (150.2, 292.9) 23 (2, 89) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.8)
Nemaha County Rural No 211.4 (165.9, 266.6) 24 (4, 82) 15 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.3)
Allen County Rural No 210.7 (167.6, 262.3) 25 (6, 82) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.0)
Geary County Urban No 209.1 (171.6, 251.9) 26 (6, 79) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Ness County Rural No 205.8 (128.9, 322.3) 27 (2, 91) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.7)
Neosho County Rural No 205.5 (168.0, 249.5) 28 (7, 79) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Wyandotte County Urban No 203.5 (188.7, 219.1) 29 (15, 53) 155 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.8)
Sumner County Urban No 202.3 (170.3, 238.9) 30 (9, 77) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Dickinson County Rural No 199.4 (165.8, 238.6) 31 (9, 81) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.5)
Gove County Rural No 197.3 (124.4, 306.7) 32 (3, 91) 4 stable stable trend 4.3 (-24.4, 43.4)
Wabaunsee County Urban No 197.1 (145.7, 263.2) 33 (5, 89) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-11.0, 5.3)
Jewell County Rural No 196.5 (131.0, 295.6) 34 (3, 91) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.6, 2.5)
Jefferson County Urban No 194.9 (160.7, 234.8) 35 (10, 83) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Butler County Urban No 193.6 (173.6, 215.3) 36 (17, 68) 73 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Bourbon County Rural No 193.2 (153.3, 240.8) 37 (6, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Coffey County Rural No 192.2 (145.9, 250.9) 38 (7, 88) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.1)
Seward County Rural No 191.5 (150.0, 240.3) 39 (7, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Atchison County Rural No 190.4 (151.7, 236.4) 40 (8, 85) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.1)
Pawnee County Rural No 190.1 (135.7, 261.4) 41 (5, 90) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 2.9)
Meade County Rural No 189.6 (120.4, 286.6) 42 (3, 91) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.2)
Barton County Rural No 189.1 (160.5, 221.8) 43 (12, 80) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.5)
Ellsworth County Rural No 186.7 (135.3, 253.2) 44 (6, 90) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.1, 3.9)
Harvey County Urban No 185.6 (161.1, 213.1) 45 (18, 78) 43 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Leavenworth County Urban No 185.1 (166.6, 205.0) 46 (21, 75) 80 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Rooks County Rural No 184.5 (127.6, 262.3) 47 (5, 91) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.3)
Sedgwick County Urban No 182.9 (175.5, 190.5) 48 (33, 64) 497 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Lyon County Rural No 182.4 (154.0, 214.7) 49 (15, 83) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Montgomery County Rural No 181.2 (156.0, 209.7) 50 (18, 83) 39 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Reno County Rural No 180.0 (161.7, 199.8) 51 (25, 77) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Saline County Rural No 179.9 (160.1, 201.6) 52 (23, 78) 62 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Gray County Rural No 179.3 (122.1, 255.7) 53 (5, 91) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.1)
Mitchell County Rural No 179.3 (125.9, 250.5) 54 (6, 91) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 1.8)
Shawnee County Urban No 177.6 (166.2, 189.6) 55 (34, 72) 192 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
McPherson County Rural No 177.0 (151.7, 205.6) 56 (20, 83) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Anderson County Rural No 175.6 (127.4, 237.4) 57 (8, 90) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Pratt County Rural No 175.2 (129.9, 232.3) 58 (8, 90) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.0)
Douglas County Urban No 174.4 (157.7, 192.4) 59 (30, 79) 87 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Jackson County Urban No 174.3 (137.0, 219.5) 60 (13, 89) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Marshall County Rural No 169.2 (128.8, 219.8) 61 (11, 90) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 0.9)
Norton County Rural No 168.7 (114.5, 241.5) 62 (6, 91) 6 stable stable trend 21.6 (-2.7, 44.2)
Marion County Rural No 165.9 (130.6, 209.6) 63 (16, 90) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Ford County Rural No 165.8 (136.4, 199.3) 64 (21, 88) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Sherman County Rural No 164.1 (114.3, 231.1) 65 (9, 91) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.0, 0.6)
Riley County Urban No 162.8 (140.2, 187.8) 66 (28, 87) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Osage County Urban No 160.4 (127.6, 199.8) 67 (20, 90) 18 falling falling trend -2.4 (-10.1, -1.1)
Pottawatomie County Urban No 159.6 (128.9, 195.3) 68 (21, 90) 20 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Osborne County Rural No 159.5 (103.8, 243.2) 69 (7, 91) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.3, 2.4)
Woodson County Rural No 158.0 (93.9, 257.8) 70 (5, 91) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.4)
Washington County Rural No 157.2 (107.2, 225.5) 71 (11, 91) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 1.7)
Ellis County Rural No 156.7 (129.3, 188.4) 72 (29, 90) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Rawlins County Rural No 155.1 (85.5, 268.3) 73 (5, 91) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.6)
Grant County Rural No 154.9 (101.4, 226.7) 74 (9, 91) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.6)
Scott County Rural No 154.5 (100.8, 229.2) 75 (8, 91) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.5, 2.4)
Greenwood County Rural No 154.2 (110.8, 214.1) 76 (17, 91) 8 falling falling trend -4.4 (-19.1, -2.0)
Miami County Urban No 153.8 (130.3, 180.6) 77 (36, 89) 32 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.2, 0.0)
Graham County Rural No 153.5 (92.6, 257.2) 78 (7, 91) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.8, 2.6)
Rush County Rural No 151.1 (90.0, 247.2) 79 (7, 91) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 1.8)
Johnson County Urban No 150.5 (144.2, 156.9) 80 (64, 85) 460 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Clay County Rural No 148.9 (110.2, 199.3) 81 (21, 91) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.6)
Smith County Rural No 148.5 (91.5, 236.2) 82 (8, 91) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.7, -0.4)
Ottawa County Rural No 147.4 (98.7, 214.4) 83 (13, 91) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.5, 0.2)
Kearny County Rural No 147.2 (83.8, 241.2) 84 (6, 91) 3
*
*
Finney County Rural No 143.6 (117.9, 173.0) 85 (40, 91) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Stevens County Rural No 142.9 (88.4, 220.2) 86 (12, 91) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.6)
Thomas County Rural No 137.4 (92.6, 196.9) 87 (20, 91) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.9, -0.2)
Chautauqua County Rural No 129.3 (79.7, 207.8) 88 (17, 91) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.7, -0.3)
Stafford County Rural No 127.8 (79.5, 201.4) 89 (19, 91) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.4, -0.7)
Lincoln County Rural No 123.1 (68.6, 214.6) 90 (13, 91) 3 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.6, 0.3)
Decatur County Rural No 122.8 (69.7, 214.3) 91 (15, 91) 3 falling falling trend -33.8 (-60.3, -4.9)
Chase County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hodgeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wichita County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 12:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top