Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A No 175.9 (174.4, 177.3) N/A 12,205 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Mason County Rural No 243.1 (199.8, 294.3) 9 (1, 83) 23 falling falling trend -17.6 (-25.9, -10.9)
Gallatin County Rural No 170.9 (116.9, 246.9) 89 (3, 102) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-12.8, -1.7)
Henderson County Rural No 161.0 (118.8, 218.7) 97 (8, 102) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -1.1)
Cook County Urban No 164.1 (161.8, 166.3) 95 (81, 98) 4,308 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -2.5)
Hancock County Rural No 160.7 (131.2, 195.9) 98 (30, 102) 22 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Menard County Urban No 159.0 (122.1, 204.8) 100 (17, 102) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -1.0)
Bureau County Rural No 186.3 (162.8, 212.7) 72 (17, 100) 47 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.4)
Cass County Rural No 176.0 (135.2, 225.7) 83 (8, 102) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.7)
St. Clair County Urban No 190.5 (179.9, 201.6) 66 (35, 85) 262 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.8)
DuPage County Urban No 150.0 (145.1, 155.1) 102 (92, 102) 748 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Johnson County Rural No 189.1 (151.9, 233.6) 68 (6, 102) 18 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Monroe County Urban No 162.9 (139.2, 189.9) 96 (39, 102) 36 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Putnam County Rural No 183.7 (130.7, 255.3) 74 (3, 102) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.1)
Saline County Rural No 205.6 (174.7, 240.9) 39 (6, 98) 33 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.6)
Adams County Rural No 181.6 (164.2, 200.5) 77 (32, 97) 83 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Bond County Urban No 204.4 (166.1, 249.4) 42 (3, 101) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.1)
Clinton County Urban No 175.0 (151.1, 201.9) 84 (25, 102) 40 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Greene County Rural No 193.8 (154.0, 242.1) 56 (4, 102) 17 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
Christian County Rural No 194.7 (169.5, 222.9) 55 (11, 97) 44 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Clay County Rural No 218.0 (174.5, 269.7) 27 (1, 100) 18 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.3)
Kankakee County Urban No 197.9 (182.6, 214.2) 47 (21, 85) 128 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Sangamon County Urban No 189.6 (178.2, 201.6) 67 (35, 87) 220 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Wayne County Rural No 166.5 (134.8, 204.3) 93 (24, 102) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Williamson County Rural No 193.8 (175.4, 213.7) 57 (20, 91) 86 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.1)
Kane County Urban No 159.2 (152.1, 166.5) 99 (81, 101) 414 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Marshall County Urban No 176.3 (137.9, 223.5) 82 (10, 102) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.0)
Boone County Urban No 171.5 (150.5, 194.7) 87 (38, 102) 52 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Carroll County Rural No 190.6 (158.0, 229.1) 64 (8, 102) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Henry County Urban No 188.2 (167.6, 210.9) 69 (19, 97) 64 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Lake County Urban No 156.5 (150.6, 162.6) 101 (86, 102) 568 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
McDonough County Rural No 183.6 (153.9, 217.7) 75 (13, 102) 29 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Perry County Rural No 197.1 (164.6, 234.6) 51 (6, 101) 27 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
White County Rural No 219.8 (180.2, 266.6) 23 (2, 99) 22 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Will County Urban No 180.9 (174.1, 187.9) 78 (55, 89) 599 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Coles County Rural No 190.9 (167.8, 216.5) 63 (16, 98) 51 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Douglas County Rural No 197.4 (162.4, 237.9) 50 (6, 101) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Grundy County Urban No 199.7 (175.4, 226.5) 44 (10, 93) 52 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Hamilton County Rural No 227.3 (173.1, 295.0) 16 (1, 102) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.1)
Macon County Urban No 214.0 (198.2, 230.7) 31 (10, 66) 144 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Montgomery County Rural No 212.2 (184.0, 243.8) 33 (5, 91) 42 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Wabash County Rural No 207.4 (163.5, 260.5) 37 (2, 102) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.3)
Franklin County Rural No 263.6 (235.3, 294.7) 3 (1, 26) 66 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Lee County Rural No 186.7 (162.7, 213.5) 71 (17, 100) 45 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Livingston County Rural No 174.7 (151.2, 201.0) 85 (29, 102) 42 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.1, -0.1)
Massac County Urban No 214.4 (174.2, 262.0) 30 (2, 100) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.2)
McLean County Urban No 180.3 (167.1, 194.2) 80 (42, 96) 147 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Tazewell County Urban No 195.1 (181.6, 209.3) 54 (24, 84) 162 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Winnebago County Urban No 192.8 (183.3, 202.7) 59 (34, 81) 325 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Jackson County Rural No 195.6 (172.5, 221.1) 53 (13, 95) 55 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Stark County Urban No 183.9 (128.5, 258.8) 73 (2, 102) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.5)
Washington County Rural No 178.3 (141.5, 222.7) 81 (8, 102) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
Cumberland County Rural No 199.2 (153.9, 254.8) 45 (3, 102) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.7)
Jo Daviess County Rural No 169.4 (143.8, 199.4) 90 (30, 102) 35 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Kendall County Urban No 167.0 (150.5, 184.8) 91 (52, 102) 84 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Randolph County Rural No 191.2 (164.8, 220.8) 62 (14, 99) 39 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Union County Rural No 209.2 (174.7, 249.4) 35 (4, 97) 27 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Warren County Rural No 219.3 (180.8, 264.2) 25 (2, 98) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Whiteside County Rural No 196.4 (177.0, 217.6) 52 (16, 90) 78 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Brown County Rural No 166.2 (108.3, 243.6) 94 (3, 102) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.7)
Fayette County Rural No 192.7 (161.6, 228.4) 60 (8, 101) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Madison County Urban No 205.1 (194.8, 215.8) 40 (20, 66) 316 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Peoria County Urban No 209.3 (196.8, 222.4) 34 (14, 67) 218 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Jefferson County Rural No 226.9 (200.3, 256.4) 17 (3, 70) 55 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Schuyler County Rural No 182.1 (133.1, 245.8) 76 (3, 102) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Vermilion County Rural No 232.4 (213.2, 253.0) 13 (3, 47) 114 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Woodford County Urban No 171.2 (148.3, 197.0) 88 (33, 102) 42 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
DeKalb County Urban No 191.7 (173.6, 211.2) 61 (22, 92) 86 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Effingham County Rural No 197.9 (171.0, 228.0) 46 (10, 98) 41 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Morgan County Rural No 217.2 (190.1, 247.4) 28 (4, 84) 48 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Ogle County Rural No 186.9 (166.2, 209.7) 70 (22, 98) 63 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Rock Island County Urban No 190.5 (177.8, 203.9) 65 (32, 87) 176 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
La Salle County Rural No 218.1 (202.7, 234.6) 26 (8, 61) 156 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Stephenson County Rural No 200.0 (178.3, 224.0) 43 (12, 91) 65 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Edgar County Rural No 228.7 (192.4, 270.9) 15 (1, 88) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
Piatt County Urban No 172.2 (139.4, 211.2) 86 (15, 102) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Champaign County Urban No 166.8 (154.8, 179.4) 92 (63, 101) 150 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 2.4)
Clark County Rural No 193.1 (155.4, 238.0) 58 (5, 102) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.8)
McHenry County Urban No 180.8 (171.2, 190.8) 79 (50, 91) 299 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 2.4)
Pulaski County Rural No 261.5 (193.3, 349.5) 4 (1, 100) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.1)
Alexander County Urban No 287.2 (216.1, 379.0) 2 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.7)
Edwards County Rural No 294.0 (223.3, 382.5) 1 (1, 83) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.3, 2.8)
Knox County Rural No 207.2 (186.4, 230.0) 38 (10, 85) 75 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Logan County Rural No 226.2 (195.7, 260.5) 18 (2, 83) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Calhoun County Urban No 245.1 (177.5, 335.9) 8 (1, 102) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.6)
Marion County Rural No 219.4 (193.5, 248.1) 24 (3, 79) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Richland County Rural No 204.5 (166.7, 249.0) 41 (3, 101) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Shelby County Rural No 231.5 (199.1, 268.3) 14 (2, 81) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Iroquois County Rural No 213.6 (184.7, 246.1) 32 (4, 88) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Macoupin County Urban No 219.9 (196.3, 245.9) 22 (5, 75) 67 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Fulton County Rural No 239.9 (212.1, 270.7) 11 (1, 57) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Jersey County Urban No 197.8 (166.5, 234.0) 48 (7, 100) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Lawrence County Rural No 220.0 (179.5, 267.5) 21 (2, 98) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Crawford County Rural No 225.2 (187.6, 268.6) 19 (1, 90) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Mercer County Urban No 208.8 (172.9, 251.1) 36 (3, 99) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
Jasper County Rural No 235.9 (185.4, 297.3) 12 (1, 99) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.5)
Ford County Urban No 241.7 (195.9, 295.7) 10 (1, 86) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Scott County Rural No 220.8 (152.7, 312.4) 20 (1, 102) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Pike County Rural No 247.7 (205.9, 296.5) 7 (1, 72) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.6)
Moultrie County Rural No 249.6 (203.8, 303.1) 6 (1, 85) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.2)
Hardin County Rural No 252.0 (177.2, 355.7) 5 (1, 102) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.6, 3.6)
De Witt County Rural No 217.0 (176.6, 264.6) 29 (2, 97) 21 stable stable trend 12.9 (-0.5, 22.6)
Pope County Rural No 197.7 (136.9, 289.0) 49 (1, 102) 8
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 3:00 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top