Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 167.2 (165.2, 169.3) N/A 5,394 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.7)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Swift County Rural No 136.0 (100.2, 182.0) 85 (17, 87) 10 falling falling trend -21.6 (-44.4, -1.2)
Douglas County Rural No 148.0 (129.2, 169.2) 78 (39, 86) 47 falling falling trend -4.8 (-13.0, -1.8)
Murray County Rural Yes 113.6 (81.3, 157.9) 86 (46, 87) 8 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.9, -1.1)
Koochiching County Rural No 156.0 (124.4, 195.5) 74 (12, 87) 17 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Todd County Rural No 149.4 (125.8, 176.6) 77 (27, 86) 30 falling falling trend -2.5 (-6.9, -1.3)
Rice County Rural No 157.3 (139.3, 176.9) 70 (30, 85) 58 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.8)
Scott County Urban No 146.9 (133.3, 161.4) 79 (53, 86) 96 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Jackson County Rural No 138.7 (104.2, 182.8) 84 (16, 87) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.3)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 140.9 (101.4, 194.9) 83 (10, 87) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.8)
Lincoln County Rural No 198.8 (143.4, 271.7) 19 (1, 86) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 0.5)
Washington County Urban No 146.1 (137.2, 155.5) 80 (62, 85) 214 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Olmsted County Urban No 144.4 (133.3, 156.3) 82 (59, 86) 128 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.4)
Carver County Urban No 144.6 (129.4, 160.9) 81 (50, 86) 73 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Hennepin County Urban No 156.4 (152.0, 161.0) 72 (56, 78) 985 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Lyon County Rural No 180.2 (150.1, 214.6) 39 (4, 83) 26 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.6)
Mahnomen County Rural No 191.5 (128.9, 275.8) 27 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.5)
Nicollet County Urban No 162.5 (138.0, 190.2) 66 (15, 85) 32 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3)
Pope County Rural No 166.5 (129.4, 212.3) 64 (5, 87) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Red Lake County Rural No 168.0 (107.4, 255.1) 61 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.7, 0.9)
Roseau County Rural No 173.6 (138.0, 216.0) 50 (4, 86) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
St. Louis County Urban No 178.2 (167.9, 188.9) 42 (22, 64) 241 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Steele County Rural No 154.9 (133.0, 179.6) 75 (26, 86) 37 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Anoka County Urban No 167.0 (158.4, 176.0) 63 (37, 74) 313 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Benton County Urban No 189.6 (162.8, 219.4) 29 (4, 78) 38 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Dakota County Urban No 156.0 (148.4, 163.8) 73 (51, 80) 345 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Itasca County Rural No 193.4 (173.0, 215.9) 24 (6, 63) 71 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Redwood County Rural No 171.0 (138.0, 210.3) 57 (5, 86) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Sibley County Rural No 156.9 (122.6, 198.4) 71 (9, 87) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3)
Winona County Rural No 170.6 (149.4, 194.2) 59 (14, 83) 50 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Becker County Rural No 160.5 (138.3, 185.6) 69 (20, 85) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Beltrami County Rural No 171.6 (149.0, 196.7) 54 (11, 83) 44 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Big Stone County Rural No 214.1 (152.4, 295.8) 9 (1, 86) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.3)
Cook County Rural Yes 105.0 (68.3, 161.7) 87 (46, 87) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.8)
Morrison County Rural No 176.3 (152.6, 203.0) 46 (8, 83) 42 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Kittson County Rural No 167.4 (113.3, 245.5) 62 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.6)
Kanabec County Rural No 201.1 (165.6, 243.0) 16 (1, 78) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.8)
Mower County Rural No 172.0 (149.4, 197.3) 52 (9, 83) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Otter Tail County Rural No 180.1 (162.8, 198.9) 40 (12, 73) 88 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Le Sueur County Urban No 198.5 (169.4, 231.4) 20 (2, 72) 36 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Cass County Rural No 189.3 (164.8, 217.0) 31 (5, 75) 50 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Clay County Urban No 171.6 (151.5, 193.5) 55 (15, 82) 54 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Pine County Rural No 199.1 (173.3, 228.1) 18 (2, 66) 45 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Stevens County Rural No 150.0 (107.2, 204.8) 76 (6, 87) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Wright County Urban No 175.6 (161.2, 190.9) 47 (18, 73) 120 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Hubbard County Rural No 161.9 (136.3, 191.9) 67 (14, 86) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Pipestone County Rural No 212.5 (164.2, 271.9) 10 (1, 83) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.0)
Stearns County Urban No 169.0 (156.7, 182.0) 60 (27, 76) 146 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Wabasha County Urban No 191.7 (162.6, 225.2) 26 (3, 78) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Wilkin County Rural No 177.6 (125.9, 245.3) 44 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.1)
Houston County Urban No 171.6 (141.1, 207.6) 53 (6, 85) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Martin County Rural No 180.7 (152.1, 214.1) 36 (5, 83) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.3)
Meeker County Rural No 170.9 (143.6, 202.4) 58 (9, 85) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Aitkin County Rural No 181.7 (151.2, 218.6) 35 (4, 83) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Carlton County Urban No 209.6 (182.7, 239.6) 12 (2, 60) 46 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Chippewa County Rural No 193.1 (154.4, 239.7) 25 (1, 84) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Fillmore County Urban No 201.9 (171.0, 237.3) 14 (2, 73) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Freeborn County Rural No 173.5 (149.7, 200.4) 51 (10, 83) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 171.5 (149.9, 195.4) 56 (11, 83) 47 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
McLeod County Rural No 175.5 (152.7, 201.0) 48 (11, 81) 43 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Blue Earth County Urban No 176.4 (156.5, 198.1) 45 (13, 79) 59 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Crow Wing County Rural No 187.6 (170.6, 206.1) 33 (9, 65) 97 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Dodge County Urban No 161.3 (129.4, 198.8) 68 (8, 86) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.2)
Isanti County Urban No 189.1 (164.1, 217.0) 32 (5, 75) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.7)
Lake County Rural No 186.9 (148.7, 234.1) 34 (2, 85) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.5)
Lake of the Woods County Rural No 237.2 (153.9, 352.7) 4 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.0)
Rock County Urban No 173.8 (131.4, 227.0) 49 (2, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Marshall County Rural No 177.9 (136.1, 230.3) 43 (2, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Clearwater County Rural No 225.6 (175.1, 287.8) 5 (1, 76) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Sherburne County Urban No 200.7 (180.6, 222.3) 17 (4, 56) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.5)
Brown County Rural No 214.1 (184.4, 247.6) 8 (1, 57) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 239.8 (206.0, 277.8) 2 (1, 33) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 194.9 (148.5, 252.4) 22 (1, 85) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.6)
Cottonwood County Rural No 180.2 (143.0, 225.6) 38 (3, 85) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.5)
Goodhue County Rural No 196.2 (174.3, 220.3) 21 (4, 63) 61 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Norman County Rural No 245.3 (186.3, 319.6) 1 (1, 73) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Polk County Urban No 215.1 (185.9, 247.9) 7 (1, 55) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Faribault County Rural No 189.5 (153.3, 232.9) 30 (2, 84) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Wadena County Rural No 238.3 (195.3, 288.7) 3 (1, 54) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Nobles County Rural No 190.2 (157.9, 227.3) 28 (3, 80) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Grant County Rural No 210.8 (154.8, 283.2) 11 (1, 85) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.3)
Watonwan County Rural No 179.0 (138.4, 228.8) 41 (2, 86) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Traverse County Rural No 216.4 (147.2, 314.6) 6 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.3)
Ramsey County Urban No 165.0 (158.1, 172.2) 65 (42, 73) 445 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.2, 3.9)
Chisago County Urban No 194.0 (172.5, 217.5) 23 (4, 65) 64 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 11.1)
Renville County Rural No 207.6 (170.5, 251.4) 13 (1, 79) 23 stable stable trend 11.2 (-2.9, 22.7)
Waseca County Rural No 180.6 (147.5, 219.6) 37 (4, 84) 21 stable stable trend 14.8 (-2.3, 29.1)
Pennington County Rural No 201.3 (160.8, 249.5) 15 (1, 81) 17 rising rising trend 16.9 (2.3, 26.0)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 5:19 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top