Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi N/A No 220.4 (217.0, 223.8) N/A 3,558 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Madison County Urban No 238.2 (217.4, 260.4) 27 (8, 60) 114 falling falling trend -9.4 (-14.5, -4.3)
Calhoun County Rural No 206.8 (163.3, 258.8) 58 (7, 81) 16 falling falling trend -7.0 (-23.4, -2.2)
Smith County Rural No 204.0 (164.1, 251.4) 62 (9, 81) 19 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.0, -3.6)
Pike County Rural No 211.4 (184.7, 241.0) 55 (15, 75) 48 falling falling trend -5.1 (-14.9, -2.0)
Benton County Urban No 185.6 (132.9, 253.6) 71 (5, 81) 9 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.2, -2.1)
Amite County Rural No 147.5 (115.9, 187.0) 81 (59, 81) 16 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -1.9)
Leake County Rural No 219.9 (183.4, 261.8) 49 (5, 78) 27 falling falling trend -3.4 (-11.0, -2.1)
Greene County Rural No 170.2 (130.4, 218.6) 76 (24, 81) 13 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.2, -1.4)
Lauderdale County Rural No 178.4 (160.4, 198.0) 75 (52, 80) 76 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.9, -2.6)
Lee County Rural No 268.1 (244.2, 293.7) 6 (3, 37) 104 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.4, -1.6)
Stone County Urban No 215.8 (175.6, 262.8) 52 (6, 80) 23 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.4)
Lamar County Urban No 158.6 (139.1, 180.0) 80 (65, 81) 51 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.7)
Winston County Rural No 193.1 (157.7, 234.6) 69 (18, 81) 22 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.1)
Clay County Rural No 195.1 (158.7, 237.7) 67 (15, 81) 21 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.5)
Jefferson Davis County Rural No 191.3 (149.0, 243.4) 70 (10, 81) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.7)
Perry County Urban No 212.8 (166.1, 269.3) 54 (4, 81) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.6)
Rankin County Urban No 164.1 (151.8, 177.1) 77 (67, 81) 139 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -1.4)
Wilkinson County Rural No 203.9 (149.9, 271.8) 63 (3, 81) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.2)
Franklin County Rural No 160.3 (114.7, 220.1) 79 (22, 81) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.6)
Grenada County Rural No 225.4 (188.6, 267.7) 46 (5, 75) 28 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Lincoln County Rural No 233.0 (202.4, 267.1) 38 (6, 70) 45 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Walthall County Rural No 201.4 (162.0, 248.4) 64 (11, 81) 19 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.8)
Alcorn County Rural No 204.1 (177.3, 234.0) 61 (19, 78) 43 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Copiah County Urban No 201.3 (171.1, 235.6) 65 (17, 79) 34 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Montgomery County Rural No 205.8 (158.1, 264.8) 59 (6, 81) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Simpson County Urban No 193.3 (162.6, 228.3) 68 (20, 80) 30 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Holmes County Urban No 312.8 (260.4, 372.9) 3 (1, 37) 26 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
Lafayette County Rural No 185.5 (158.0, 216.1) 72 (32, 81) 39 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Webster County Rural No 242.4 (180.0, 319.6) 21 (1, 81) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.1)
Panola County Rural No 227.1 (196.6, 261.1) 45 (8, 74) 43 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Washington County Rural No 239.6 (210.6, 271.6) 25 (5, 67) 56 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
George County Rural No 247.5 (207.2, 293.3) 17 (2, 71) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Jackson County Urban No 220.6 (205.6, 236.5) 48 (21, 65) 179 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Oktibbeha County Rural No 181.7 (155.9, 210.5) 73 (40, 81) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.1)
Tunica County Urban No 257.3 (188.4, 342.9) 12 (1, 80) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
DeSoto County Urban No 207.6 (193.0, 223.0) 57 (34, 71) 171 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Yalobusha County Rural No 241.0 (195.5, 295.2) 23 (2, 76) 21 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Forrest County Urban No 233.6 (210.9, 258.0) 36 (8, 64) 81 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Hancock County Urban No 196.0 (174.4, 219.8) 66 (34, 78) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Harrison County Urban No 231.6 (218.6, 245.2) 41 (15, 57) 260 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Sunflower County Rural No 264.8 (225.2, 309.5) 9 (2, 62) 34 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Chickasaw County Rural No 217.5 (178.3, 263.2) 51 (5, 80) 22 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3)
Covington County Rural No 235.6 (196.2, 281.1) 33 (4, 74) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Pearl River County Rural No 234.6 (212.0, 259.1) 35 (9, 63) 85 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Tallahatchie County Rural No 235.3 (186.7, 293.2) 34 (2, 78) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Adams County Rural No 232.8 (201.9, 267.3) 40 (6, 72) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Bolivar County Rural No 313.0 (270.0, 360.9) 2 (1, 25) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Lowndes County Rural No 236.3 (211.5, 263.3) 32 (7, 64) 71 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Marion County Rural No 233.3 (199.4, 271.6) 37 (5, 72) 35 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 3.5)
Marshall County Urban No 281.8 (248.5, 318.6) 5 (1, 35) 57 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Warren County Rural No 236.5 (209.1, 266.5) 30 (6, 67) 61 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Clarke County Rural No 204.7 (166.3, 250.2) 60 (10, 81) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Kemper County Rural No 164.0 (121.3, 218.7) 78 (24, 81) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.4)
Monroe County Rural No 222.9 (194.1, 255.0) 47 (10, 74) 46 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Carroll County Rural No 229.3 (183.1, 285.4) 42 (3, 78) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.2)
Attala County Rural No 264.4 (221.7, 313.5) 10 (2, 63) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Choctaw County Rural No 178.8 (132.4, 238.2) 74 (9, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.0)
Coahoma County Rural No 265.5 (222.4, 314.9) 8 (1, 63) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.7)
Tate County Urban No 252.1 (216.6, 292.1) 13 (3, 64) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Jefferson County Rural No 239.7 (175.3, 320.8) 24 (1, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.7)
Pontotoc County Rural No 251.6 (216.7, 290.5) 14 (3, 63) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Claiborne County Rural No 232.8 (170.7, 310.6) 39 (1, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.2)
Newton County Rural No 236.4 (197.3, 281.3) 31 (3, 74) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
Wayne County Rural No 245.3 (204.2, 292.5) 19 (3, 71) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Tishomingo County Rural No 245.3 (206.7, 289.6) 18 (3, 69) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Yazoo County Urban No 266.6 (226.3, 311.9) 7 (1, 61) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Hinds County Urban No 228.2 (215.0, 242.0) 43 (19, 58) 247 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Lawrence County Rural No 248.6 (197.6, 309.3) 15 (2, 77) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.6)
Tippah County Rural No 227.9 (189.9, 271.5) 44 (4, 75) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Jasper County Rural No 236.6 (196.4, 283.3) 29 (2, 76) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Scott County Urban No 243.2 (207.0, 283.8) 20 (4, 70) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Noxubee County Rural No 238.6 (182.0, 307.8) 26 (1, 80) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Quitman County Rural No 247.9 (173.2, 344.9) 16 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 1.8)
Union County Rural No 237.5 (203.5, 275.7) 28 (4, 72) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Prentiss County Rural No 241.3 (205.9, 281.3) 22 (4, 71) 34 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9)
Leflore County Rural No 312.4 (267.6, 362.5) 4 (1, 28) 38 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.2)
Jones County Rural No 218.8 (197.4, 241.9) 50 (17, 70) 82 stable stable trend 6.3 (-1.5, 12.1)
Itawamba County Rural No 214.7 (181.5, 252.5) 53 (10, 79) 31 stable stable trend 7.2 (-2.9, 14.7)
Neshoba County Rural No 259.9 (223.7, 300.5) 11 (2, 60) 39 rising rising trend 8.1 (0.7, 12.3)
Humphreys County Rural No 363.3 (280.6, 463.2) 1 (1, 34) 14 stable stable trend 16.8 (-2.0, 41.5)
Sharkey County Rural No 211.3 (140.1, 312.3) 56 (1, 81) 5
*
*
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 12:42 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top