Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for North Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Dakota N/A No 161.0 (155.6, 166.6) N/A 695 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.3)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
McKenzie County Rural Yes 81.9 (51.0, 123.9) 39 (30, 39) 5 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.4, -2.6)
Grant County Rural No 164.7 (92.9, 285.7) 21 (1, 39) 3 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.5, 0.2)
McLean County Rural No 133.0 (99.6, 176.3) 34 (11, 39) 11 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.2)
Ransom County Rural No 175.5 (122.4, 246.4) 15 (2, 38) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.2, -0.8)
Emmons County Rural No 129.3 (82.2, 206.7) 35 (6, 39) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -1.2)
Cavalier County Rural No 124.3 (72.1, 205.8) 37 (5, 39) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.2, 0.9)
Pierce County Rural No 164.2 (104.1, 251.8) 22 (2, 39) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.6, 0.3)
Traill County Rural No 156.0 (112.5, 212.6) 25 (3, 38) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.4)
Stark County Rural No 150.9 (124.3, 181.4) 30 (9, 37) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.5)
Cass County Urban No 168.9 (156.0, 182.5) 17 (9, 29) 135 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Burleigh County Urban No 152.4 (138.1, 167.8) 29 (14, 35) 86 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Foster County Rural No 225.1 (144.3, 338.8) 4 (1, 37) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.3, 1.1)
Dunn County Rural No 155.9 (93.6, 245.8) 26 (2, 39) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.5, 2.4)
LaMoure County Rural Yes 115.3 (71.3, 183.5) 38 (9, 39) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.6, 17.9)
Mountrail County Rural No 150.7 (103.0, 212.6) 31 (4, 39) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.4)
Stutsman County Rural No 168.4 (138.3, 203.3) 19 (5, 35) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Williams County Rural No 155.1 (126.1, 188.4) 27 (7, 37) 22 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Barnes County Rural No 168.6 (129.2, 217.7) 18 (3, 37) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Benson County Rural No 191.0 (127.7, 275.5) 8 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.1)
Grand Forks County Urban No 180.9 (160.3, 203.5) 12 (5, 28) 58 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Richland County Rural No 149.6 (118.5, 187.1) 32 (7, 38) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Rolette County Rural No 248.5 (189.5, 319.7) 2 (1, 23) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Walsh County Rural No 185.3 (143.5, 236.6) 11 (2, 35) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.4)
Wells County Rural No 125.4 (82.5, 193.4) 36 (9, 39) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.9, 2.2)
Mercer County Rural No 167.9 (122.2, 226.5) 20 (2, 38) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.3)
Morton County Urban No 190.0 (161.5, 222.2) 9 (3, 29) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Ramsey County Rural No 192.7 (151.5, 242.8) 7 (2, 33) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.8)
Nelson County Rural No 160.8 (96.0, 262.1) 24 (1, 39) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 2.8)
Burke County Rural No 233.2 (130.5, 388.9) 3 (1, 39) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.2)
Bowman County Rural No 176.2 (102.9, 286.5) 14 (1, 39) 3 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 3.7)
Bottineau County Rural No 172.4 (122.9, 237.7) 16 (2, 38) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.8)
McHenry County Urban No 161.4 (105.0, 239.2) 23 (2, 39) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.5, 3.7)
Dickey County Rural No 176.6 (116.8, 258.6) 13 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 3.0)
Eddy County Rural No 272.4 (166.3, 427.8) 1 (1, 36) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.7, 5.3)
Pembina County Rural No 188.9 (141.8, 249.8) 10 (1, 35) 11 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.2, 14.1)
Ward County Urban No 153.8 (135.0, 174.4) 28 (12, 35) 50 stable stable trend 7.4 (-3.2, 16.0)
Kidder County Rural No 147.4 (82.9, 254.9) 33 (2, 39) 3
*
*
McIntosh County Rural No 210.5 (122.9, 344.9) 6 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Sargent County Rural No 215.1 (147.6, 307.8) 5 (1, 36) 7
*
*
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Billings County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Divide County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Griggs County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hettinger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oliver County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Slope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steele County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Towner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 12:14 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top