Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee N/A No 202.5 (200.5, 204.6) N/A 7,843 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Cannon County Urban No 222.1 (178.8, 273.1) 49 (1, 93) 19 falling falling trend -14.5 (-26.0, -1.1)
Benton County Rural No 224.2 (186.8, 268.0) 44 (2, 92) 28 falling falling trend -6.4 (-17.9, -1.4)
Sumner County Urban No 192.2 (180.0, 205.1) 81 (55, 91) 201 stable stable trend -3.6 (-8.0, 0.0)
Davidson County Urban No 187.5 (180.2, 195.1) 84 (69, 90) 551 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -2.2)
Blount County Urban No 172.1 (160.0, 184.9) 90 (76, 94) 162 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.9)
Hamilton County Urban No 180.9 (172.8, 189.4) 89 (74, 92) 389 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -2.0)
Macon County Urban No 235.8 (199.4, 277.1) 28 (1, 89) 33 falling falling trend -2.3 (-12.5, -0.4)
Perry County Rural No 167.6 (125.4, 221.4) 92 (16, 95) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.2)
Wilson County Urban No 186.1 (172.2, 200.9) 86 (58, 92) 151 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Claiborne County Rural No 222.8 (193.8, 255.2) 48 (5, 89) 47 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Grainger County Urban No 212.1 (179.2, 249.9) 66 (6, 92) 34 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Maury County Urban No 186.3 (170.0, 203.8) 85 (54, 93) 108 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Roane County Urban No 190.0 (171.2, 210.7) 82 (44, 93) 81 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Marshall County Rural No 212.6 (183.4, 245.2) 64 (9, 92) 42 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Bledsoe County Rural No 138.9 (108.6, 176.0) 94 (76, 95) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.8, 0.1)
Franklin County Rural No 194.5 (171.4, 220.0) 80 (29, 93) 56 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Knox County Urban No 182.6 (175.0, 190.5) 87 (73, 92) 462 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Loudon County Urban No 171.4 (154.1, 190.3) 91 (68, 94) 83 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.8)
Polk County Urban No 230.4 (192.3, 274.5) 33 (2, 91) 28 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.1)
Shelby County Urban No 202.1 (195.7, 208.6) 73 (53, 80) 841 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Anderson County Urban No 199.9 (182.6, 218.4) 74 (36, 91) 104 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Humphreys County Rural No 213.0 (178.7, 252.6) 63 (5, 93) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Jackson County Rural No 218.6 (177.1, 268.8) 55 (1, 93) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.1)
Lincoln County Rural No 223.8 (196.3, 254.4) 45 (5, 86) 51 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Coffee County Rural No 223.4 (200.9, 247.9) 46 (10, 82) 76 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Fayette County Urban No 189.3 (166.7, 214.4) 83 (38, 93) 57 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Greene County Rural No 227.2 (208.1, 247.8) 37 (10, 76) 113 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Hardin County Rural No 198.9 (171.1, 230.6) 76 (20, 93) 40 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Marion County Urban No 231.3 (200.2, 266.2) 32 (2, 86) 44 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Monroe County Rural No 212.3 (189.4, 237.4) 65 (17, 89) 70 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Cumberland County Rural No 181.8 (165.8, 199.3) 88 (60, 93) 112 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Hamblen County Urban No 234.0 (211.9, 257.9) 30 (5, 72) 88 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Scott County Rural No 208.2 (174.1, 247.4) 68 (7, 93) 28 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Giles County Rural No 216.6 (187.8, 249.1) 58 (7, 91) 44 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Madison County Urban No 196.1 (179.4, 214.1) 79 (40, 92) 110 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
McMinn County Rural No 214.7 (193.2, 238.1) 60 (15, 87) 78 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Rutherford County Urban No 196.3 (184.6, 208.4) 78 (50, 88) 252 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Sullivan County Urban No 213.5 (201.2, 226.3) 61 (30, 78) 241 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Washington County Urban No 205.7 (191.8, 220.4) 70 (36, 86) 174 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Weakley County Rural No 218.8 (190.0, 251.0) 54 (6, 91) 43 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Bradley County Urban No 203.4 (186.9, 220.9) 71 (33, 89) 124 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Campbell County Urban No 233.5 (207.8, 261.7) 31 (4, 78) 64 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Cocke County Rural No 239.8 (212.0, 270.5) 22 (2, 77) 62 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Haywood County Rural No 221.5 (182.0, 267.6) 51 (2, 92) 24 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Henry County Rural No 226.1 (199.2, 256.1) 41 (5, 86) 55 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
McNairy County Rural No 226.3 (194.6, 262.2) 40 (4, 88) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Montgomery County Urban No 206.1 (191.1, 222.0) 69 (30, 87) 160 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Stewart County Urban No 225.0 (182.4, 275.3) 42 (1, 93) 21 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Trousdale County Urban No 223.3 (167.8, 290.9) 47 (1, 95) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Unicoi County Urban No 218.1 (183.0, 258.8) 56 (4, 92) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Decatur County Rural No 239.4 (193.2, 294.7) 23 (1, 92) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Fentress County Rural No 254.0 (214.0, 299.9) 15 (1, 81) 33 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Hardeman County Rural No 199.1 (169.1, 233.3) 75 (16, 93) 32 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Lawrence County Rural No 230.2 (203.5, 259.6) 34 (5, 82) 59 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
White County Rural No 224.8 (194.4, 259.1) 43 (4, 90) 41 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Gibson County Urban No 270.1 (243.6, 298.8) 5 (1, 40) 80 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.2)
Hickman County Urban No 254.9 (220.3, 293.7) 13 (1, 69) 42 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Obion County Rural No 241.4 (210.9, 275.4) 21 (2, 77) 49 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Overton County Rural No 257.2 (220.9, 298.3) 11 (1, 74) 39 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Carroll County Rural No 257.3 (224.4, 293.9) 10 (1, 67) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Henderson County Rural No 256.5 (223.1, 293.8) 12 (1, 70) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 219.1 (197.2, 243.0) 53 (11, 86) 81 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Lauderdale County Rural No 260.9 (221.9, 304.8) 7 (1, 73) 35 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Tipton County Urban No 238.7 (214.2, 265.3) 24 (3, 70) 77 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Warren County Rural No 226.6 (199.5, 256.5) 39 (5, 86) 55 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Bedford County Rural No 230.0 (203.1, 259.5) 35 (5, 82) 59 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Lake County Rural No 272.6 (200.2, 363.5) 2 (1, 92) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.4)
Robertson County Urban No 228.5 (206.2, 252.6) 36 (8, 78) 88 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Union County Urban No 258.1 (217.8, 304.3) 9 (1, 81) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Cheatham County Urban No 246.2 (216.0, 279.6) 19 (1, 75) 56 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Morgan County Urban No 226.9 (192.1, 266.5) 38 (2, 90) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.5)
Rhea County Rural No 251.8 (221.1, 285.8) 17 (1, 69) 53 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Meigs County Rural No 213.1 (170.4, 264.2) 62 (2, 93) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.7)
Putnam County Rural No 216.2 (196.4, 237.4) 59 (17, 84) 93 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Sevier County Rural No 208.3 (192.0, 225.7) 67 (31, 86) 134 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Grundy County Rural No 238.3 (195.4, 288.8) 26 (1, 92) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Wayne County Rural No 236.0 (196.0, 282.3) 27 (1, 91) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.3)
Hancock County Rural No 217.0 (161.9, 287.8) 57 (1, 95) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.5)
Lewis County Rural No 276.1 (227.7, 332.8) 1 (1, 72) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Crockett County Urban No 254.7 (207.9, 309.5) 14 (1, 89) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
DeKalb County Rural No 253.9 (215.7, 297.4) 16 (1, 82) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Dickson County Urban No 242.2 (217.1, 269.5) 20 (2, 71) 75 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Hawkins County Urban No 238.6 (217.1, 261.9) 25 (4, 68) 98 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Johnson County Rural No 234.6 (197.6, 277.2) 29 (1, 89) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Moore County Rural No 138.2 (95.2, 197.0) 95 (45, 95) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.9)
Houston County Rural No 264.4 (205.4, 336.8) 6 (1, 90) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.5)
Clay County Rural No 272.5 (214.8, 343.6) 3 (1, 86) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Van Buren County Rural No 220.0 (161.9, 295.1) 52 (1, 95) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 3.1)
Dyer County Rural No 259.6 (229.1, 293.2) 8 (1, 60) 56 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Pickett County Rural No 249.3 (186.7, 332.6) 18 (1, 93) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.9)
Carter County Urban No 202.4 (183.0, 223.6) 72 (31, 91) 84 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 7.4)
Smith County Urban No 221.6 (184.7, 264.2) 50 (2, 92) 28 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.5, 7.1)
Chester County Urban No 271.8 (224.6, 326.2) 4 (1, 78) 25 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.7, 9.8)
Williamson County Urban No 140.0 (130.4, 150.2) 93 (91, 95) 171 stable stable trend 2.7 (-3.1, 7.3)
Sequatchie County Urban No 196.6 (160.4, 239.4) 77 (8, 94) 23 stable stable trend 9.8 (-4.5, 31.9)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 7:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top