Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A No 170.1 (169.1, 171.2) N/A 22,795 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.3)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Duval County Rural No 168.1 (124.6, 222.3) 174 (18, 226) 10 falling falling trend -10.6 (-28.0, -3.0)
Young County Rural No 242.4 (203.3, 287.5) 25 (3, 166) 29 stable stable trend -8.6 (-17.5, 0.6)
Bastrop County Urban No 156.1 (140.6, 172.8) 207 (134, 220) 86 falling falling trend -5.0 (-12.6, -2.7)
Smith County Urban No 186.3 (175.8, 197.3) 136 (83, 174) 244 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.7, -1.2)
Hall County Rural No 136.5 (80.7, 229.3) 220 (11, 227) 3 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.8, -1.4)
Comanche County Rural No 164.8 (130.8, 206.1) 185 (33, 225) 17 falling falling trend -4.1 (-14.2, -2.3)
Brewster County Rural Yes 116.6 (83.5, 160.6) 225 (116, 227) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.7, -0.5)
Andrews County Rural No 156.4 (115.0, 206.7) 206 (26, 226) 10 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.7)
Mills County Rural No 204.9 (147.3, 284.3) 89 (3, 224) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.6, -0.1)
Garza County Urban No 169.4 (105.4, 258.5) 172 (5, 227) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.3, 0.3)
Houston County Rural No 181.7 (154.0, 213.4) 151 (34, 216) 31 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.6)
Denton County Urban No 141.4 (135.5, 147.6) 215 (196, 222) 508 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Harrison County Urban No 176.7 (158.5, 196.6) 160 (75, 210) 74 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Travis County Urban No 135.0 (130.1, 140.0) 222 (203, 224) 666 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
San Patricio County Urban No 207.2 (186.3, 229.8) 79 (22, 171) 76 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)
Washington County Rural No 157.8 (136.4, 182.0) 202 (103, 223) 41 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.3)
Winkler County Rural No 194.7 (133.8, 273.4) 115 (3, 226) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.6, 1.6)
Harris County Urban No 157.0 (154.3, 159.7) 204 (176, 206) 2,950 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.0)
Liberty County Urban No 223.9 (203.0, 246.4) 52 (15, 132) 97 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.5)
Llano County Rural No 182.4 (155.3, 214.2) 149 (33, 214) 43 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Montgomery County Urban No 164.4 (157.6, 171.5) 188 (149, 203) 492 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Austin County Urban No 184.9 (159.1, 214.0) 138 (36, 207) 39 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Brazos County Urban No 157.9 (145.2, 171.3) 201 (142, 217) 122 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Castro County Rural No 141.6 (94.3, 204.7) 214 (35, 227) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.3, 1.3)
Chambers County Urban No 195.2 (167.4, 226.2) 113 (23, 204) 40 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
Collin County Urban No 138.0 (132.7, 143.4) 218 (201, 223) 590 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
Grimes County Rural No 177.7 (151.6, 207.2) 159 (51, 217) 37 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Jack County Rural No 228.8 (174.2, 295.8) 43 (2, 213) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Marion County Rural No 185.8 (147.1, 234.7) 137 (14, 222) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Nacogdoches County Rural No 202.0 (180.0, 226.1) 95 (26, 191) 66 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.4)
Walker County Rural No 182.7 (163.2, 204.0) 144 (55, 203) 71 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Jefferson County Urban No 194.1 (183.4, 205.3) 117 (63, 159) 262 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Nueces County Urban No 164.1 (155.7, 172.8) 190 (147, 204) 306 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Tyler County Rural No 190.3 (159.9, 225.6) 127 (23, 213) 29 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Callahan County Urban No 189.1 (152.0, 233.6) 129 (16, 222) 19 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.2)
Dallam County Rural No 164.2 (101.7, 248.7) 189 (8, 227) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.5, 2.6)
Dallas County Urban No 169.6 (165.8, 173.4) 171 (146, 187) 1,746 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Galveston County Urban No 200.2 (190.8, 210.0) 103 (63, 141) 374 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Hardin County Urban No 200.5 (178.6, 224.5) 99 (27, 184) 65 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Kendall County Urban No 161.3 (141.0, 184.0) 195 (103, 223) 48 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.4)
Newton County Rural No 235.6 (190.7, 289.1) 29 (3, 193) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-9.4, -0.6)
Panola County Rural No 215.4 (182.6, 252.9) 67 (10, 192) 32 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Rockwall County Urban No 163.5 (146.7, 181.5) 191 (112, 216) 80 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.6)
Bell County Urban No 188.1 (178.0, 198.5) 130 (83, 169) 283 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Cochran County Urban No 222.0 (128.6, 360.3) 58 (1, 227) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.2, 1.6)
Eastland County Rural No 224.4 (189.2, 265.1) 51 (7, 182) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.2)
Erath County Rural No 176.7 (151.4, 205.0) 161 (51, 218) 37 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Gregg County Urban No 205.9 (190.0, 222.7) 86 (35, 154) 131 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Hopkins County Rural No 214.1 (187.3, 243.9) 70 (12, 165) 49 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Morris County Rural No 231.9 (189.2, 282.9) 37 (4, 184) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Navarro County Rural No 201.9 (179.0, 226.9) 96 (26, 186) 61 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Rusk County Urban No 200.3 (178.5, 224.1) 101 (24, 180) 64 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Tarrant County Urban No 171.5 (167.4, 175.7) 170 (144, 186) 1,494 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Ward County Rural No 167.2 (119.4, 227.1) 177 (12, 226) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.5, 0.7)
Burnet County Rural No 179.8 (160.8, 200.7) 156 (65, 206) 70 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
El Paso County Urban No 152.9 (147.2, 158.8) 208 (178, 212) 567 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Falls County Urban No 184.0 (150.2, 223.9) 139 (20, 221) 21 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.2)
Jackson County Rural No 183.7 (147.8, 226.3) 140 (22, 223) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Orange County Urban No 206.8 (188.3, 226.7) 82 (30, 158) 97 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Tom Green County Urban No 164.5 (150.6, 179.3) 187 (123, 213) 107 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Wharton County Rural No 187.6 (163.8, 214.0) 132 (39, 207) 47 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Williamson County Urban No 143.2 (136.7, 150.1) 213 (193, 221) 390 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Bexar County Urban No 167.1 (163.2, 171.2) 178 (151, 195) 1,437 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Coke County Rural No 237.4 (164.2, 341.3) 26 (1, 223) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.1, 0.9)
Fort Bend County Urban No 137.7 (131.7, 144.0) 219 (200, 224) 473 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -0.6)
Franklin County Rural No 183.5 (141.8, 235.2) 142 (11, 224) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Freestone County Rural No 193.5 (161.6, 230.5) 119 (19, 213) 27 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Guadalupe County Urban No 161.5 (149.6, 174.2) 194 (140, 212) 145 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Lampasas County Urban No 235.4 (200.9, 274.7) 30 (4, 148) 35 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Midland County Urban No 159.0 (145.1, 173.9) 199 (135, 217) 104 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Pecos County Rural No 147.8 (111.3, 192.2) 210 (49, 227) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Van Zandt County Rural No 190.4 (171.9, 210.6) 126 (48, 194) 81 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Bowie County Urban No 214.1 (196.1, 233.3) 71 (23, 146) 111 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Burleson County Urban No 192.6 (159.7, 231.1) 122 (16, 216) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Gillespie County Rural No 145.0 (124.2, 169.3) 212 (141, 225) 39 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Hale County Rural No 158.3 (131.6, 188.8) 200 (64, 225) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.3)
Hutchinson County Rural No 168.6 (137.5, 205.0) 173 (50, 224) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Kleberg County Rural No 181.6 (151.0, 216.4) 152 (26, 220) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Medina County Urban No 164.8 (144.8, 186.8) 186 (93, 219) 52 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Milam County Rural No 197.8 (169.0, 230.7) 108 (22, 202) 35 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.2)
Sabine County Rural No 200.9 (159.1, 253.2) 97 (7, 222) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Brown County Rural No 211.3 (186.5, 238.6) 75 (16, 170) 56 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Comal County Urban No 167.8 (156.2, 180.1) 176 (125, 207) 174 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Fayette County Rural No 163.4 (139.0, 191.7) 192 (64, 223) 34 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Goliad County Urban No 172.0 (128.3, 229.3) 169 (18, 226) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 0.9)
Gonzales County Rural No 182.6 (149.7, 221.0) 145 (28, 221) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Kaufman County Urban No 206.6 (189.3, 225.0) 83 (29, 157) 126 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
McCulloch County Rural No 230.7 (179.1, 295.2) 42 (2, 208) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.5)
Montague County Rural No 200.3 (169.7, 235.5) 102 (16, 203) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Val Verde County Rural No 159.2 (137.0, 183.8) 198 (100, 222) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Wilson County Urban No 182.5 (160.9, 206.3) 146 (56, 209) 56 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.3)
Wood County Rural No 219.5 (198.4, 242.6) 64 (14, 141) 89 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Atascosa County Urban No 180.3 (157.4, 205.6) 155 (56, 214) 47 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Cherokee County Rural No 195.0 (173.5, 218.5) 114 (34, 193) 62 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Ellis County Urban No 193.3 (179.6, 207.6) 120 (61, 172) 169 stable stable trend -1.3 (-1.8, 0.8)
Haskell County Rural No 178.7 (125.6, 250.3) 157 (7, 226) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.3)
Jones County Urban No 197.2 (161.7, 238.3) 110 (13, 214) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Limestone County Rural No 197.2 (166.0, 233.1) 109 (19, 210) 30 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Mason County Rural No 213.5 (149.4, 303.2) 73 (1, 225) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.6)
Somervell County Rural No 182.3 (137.4, 238.4) 150 (13, 225) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.9)
Taylor County Urban No 199.0 (184.4, 214.6) 106 (43, 162) 141 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Clay County Urban No 196.8 (155.0, 248.3) 111 (8, 220) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Cooke County Rural No 191.6 (168.1, 217.5) 124 (37, 206) 51 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Kerr County Rural No 187.0 (169.0, 206.8) 134 (59, 196) 89 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Lamar County Rural No 230.9 (206.8, 257.1) 41 (10, 129) 71 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Lamb County Rural No 187.5 (146.5, 237.1) 133 (10, 223) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.7)
Mitchell County Rural No 199.9 (144.0, 269.9) 105 (3, 224) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.0)
Moore County Rural No 167.1 (130.8, 209.9) 179 (30, 225) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.2)
Red River County Rural No 248.7 (203.6, 302.3) 18 (2, 160) 23 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Stephens County Rural No 221.6 (172.4, 281.5) 61 (3, 213) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.4)
Victoria County Urban No 182.5 (165.8, 200.4) 147 (69, 199) 92 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.2)
Brooks County Rural No 149.4 (97.5, 218.8) 209 (13, 227) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.3)
Floyd County Rural No 181.2 (122.9, 260.0) 154 (5, 227) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 1.9)
Hays County Urban No 161.6 (149.4, 174.5) 193 (135, 212) 155 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Henderson County Rural No 232.8 (215.3, 251.4) 35 (12, 96) 142 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Jim Hogg County Rural No 221.8 (146.8, 322.0) 60 (1, 226) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 1.8)
Runnels County Rural No 248.8 (199.2, 308.4) 17 (2, 182) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.7)
Wise County Urban No 200.8 (180.2, 223.1) 98 (29, 174) 79 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.2)
Coryell County Urban No 216.5 (193.0, 242.0) 66 (16, 162) 66 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Fannin County Rural No 204.0 (178.4, 232.4) 90 (20, 188) 48 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Frio County Rural No 172.5 (132.1, 220.8) 168 (22, 225) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Hidalgo County Urban No 136.0 (130.6, 141.6) 221 (203, 224) 483 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Hunt County Urban No 205.9 (189.1, 223.8) 85 (33, 157) 119 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Jasper County Rural No 236.6 (207.6, 268.8) 27 (6, 132) 52 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Leon County Rural No 231.5 (192.5, 276.9) 39 (4, 171) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Matagorda County Rural No 225.6 (197.2, 257.0) 47 (9, 153) 49 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Maverick County Urban No 166.0 (142.9, 191.7) 184 (80, 221) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.1)
Refugio County Rural No 246.4 (187.2, 321.1) 20 (1, 206) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Waller County Urban No 183.6 (159.4, 210.4) 141 (45, 212) 45 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Wichita County Urban No 224.8 (208.3, 242.3) 50 (16, 110) 147 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Camp County Rural No 228.7 (182.6, 283.7) 44 (4, 203) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Karnes County Rural No 213.0 (167.7, 266.5) 74 (5, 216) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.6)
Lee County Rural No 183.2 (150.2, 222.0) 143 (21, 219) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.9)
San Saba County Rural No 186.8 (134.8, 255.6) 135 (7, 226) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.4)
Trinity County Rural No 248.3 (206.5, 297.5) 19 (2, 145) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Blanco County Rural No 166.7 (132.0, 210.0) 181 (30, 224) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.5)
Childress County Rural No 244.7 (177.5, 329.5) 24 (1, 222) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.8)
Colorado County Rural No 205.5 (173.6, 242.2) 88 (14, 200) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
DeWitt County Rural No 193.2 (160.4, 231.3) 121 (18, 214) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Deaf Smith County Rural No 157.4 (120.7, 201.4) 203 (37, 226) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.5)
Hill County Rural No 223.2 (197.5, 251.7) 55 (11, 146) 58 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Hood County Rural No 175.1 (158.6, 193.0) 164 (88, 208) 90 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 1.1)
Lubbock County Urban No 200.5 (189.6, 211.7) 100 (58, 145) 273 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Randall County Urban No 173.5 (159.8, 188.2) 167 (99, 203) 125 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Sutton County Rural No 206.5 (129.6, 316.6) 84 (1, 227) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.8)
Aransas County Urban No 223.5 (194.2, 256.7) 54 (8, 159) 48 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Caldwell County Urban No 208.3 (182.8, 236.4) 77 (17, 179) 52 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.9)
Gaines County Rural No 166.1 (125.7, 214.4) 183 (25, 226) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 2.0)
Hockley County Urban No 191.6 (157.0, 231.8) 123 (17, 220) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Titus County Rural No 199.0 (168.3, 233.7) 107 (16, 210) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Upshur County Urban No 207.1 (182.7, 234.0) 80 (17, 185) 55 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 2.7)
Wilbarger County Rural No 224.9 (178.5, 280.2) 49 (3, 210) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Anderson County Rural No 296.3 (269.9, 324.5) 4 (1, 25) 102 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.0, 5.2)
Fisher County Rural No 232.1 (153.5, 341.0) 36 (1, 225) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.1)
Live Oak County Rural No 161.0 (124.3, 206.1) 197 (32, 226) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Potter County Urban No 214.3 (197.1, 232.5) 68 (23, 135) 121 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 3.3)
Uvalde County Rural No 203.5 (170.9, 240.5) 91 (15, 206) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Bandera County Urban No 181.5 (155.1, 212.2) 153 (42, 216) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.9)
Carson County Urban No 175.3 (120.9, 248.4) 163 (9, 227) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.2)
Jim Wells County Rural No 220.7 (192.7, 251.7) 62 (11, 168) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.9)
Kinney County Rural No 191.5 (127.6, 283.8) 125 (3, 226) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 3.1)
Shelby County Rural No 235.0 (200.5, 274.1) 31 (4, 152) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Brazoria County Urban No 194.2 (184.2, 204.5) 116 (72, 158) 322 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 1.5)
Cass County Rural No 245.5 (215.0, 279.5) 21 (4, 119) 50 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Coleman County Rural No 233.4 (183.3, 296.2) 34 (2, 212) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Kimble County Rural No 222.7 (148.8, 324.1) 56 (1, 225) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Lavaca County Rural No 208.4 (176.7, 245.0) 76 (13, 195) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Nolan County Rural No 253.6 (207.6, 307.1) 11 (1, 166) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Parmer County Rural No 178.2 (129.3, 239.6) 158 (11, 226) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.8)
Webb County Urban No 167.9 (155.9, 180.5) 175 (122, 206) 157 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Wheeler County Rural No 234.0 (165.4, 324.4) 32 (1, 223) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.1)
Angelina County Rural No 203.2 (185.2, 222.5) 92 (36, 162) 97 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 5.2)
Crosby County Urban No 218.0 (151.2, 306.5) 65 (1, 224) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 1.9)
Dawson County Rural No 206.9 (157.9, 265.9) 81 (5, 223) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.7)
Hardeman County Rural No 166.2 (104.6, 257.0) 182 (7, 227) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.3, 2.9)
Howard County Rural No 222.7 (190.8, 258.2) 57 (6, 171) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Martin County Urban No 161.0 (98.2, 249.7) 196 (4, 227) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 3.0)
Robertson County Urban No 245.2 (204.5, 292.1) 22 (3, 153) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
San Augustine County Rural No 253.0 (200.9, 317.4) 12 (1, 172) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.1)
Bee County Rural No 203.0 (171.3, 238.8) 93 (17, 201) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.2)
Lynn County Urban No 195.4 (132.5, 278.6) 112 (2, 226) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.0)
Madison County Rural No 250.8 (200.1, 310.2) 13 (1, 191) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Baylor County Rural No 327.8 (234.5, 450.8) 2 (1, 158) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.7)
La Salle County Rural No 205.8 (142.9, 287.0) 87 (2, 225) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.4)
Reeves County Rural No 231.4 (177.5, 295.8) 40 (1, 216) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
San Jacinto County Urban No 226.8 (198.1, 259.0) 45 (8, 155) 50 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.3)
Scurry County Rural No 219.9 (175.4, 272.1) 63 (3, 207) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.5)
Bosque County Urban No 231.8 (198.2, 270.6) 38 (6, 161) 36 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Calhoun County Rural No 214.0 (179.8, 253.4) 72 (8, 197) 29 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.9)
Crockett County Rural No 283.4 (182.4, 422.8) 6 (1, 223) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.9)
Terry County Rural No 235.9 (183.6, 298.6) 28 (1, 202) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.6)
Archer County Urban No 156.4 (114.5, 210.6) 205 (28, 227) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.4)
Delta County Rural No 250.6 (183.7, 337.3) 14 (1, 215) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.4)
Hamilton County Rural No 254.7 (202.2, 318.9) 10 (1, 167) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.0)
Zavala County Rural No 214.2 (156.3, 285.9) 69 (1, 224) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.5)
Lipscomb County Rural No 202.9 (120.3, 323.8) 94 (1, 227) 3 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.7, 5.3)
Polk County Rural No 329.9 (291.7, 371.3) 1 (1, 16) 88 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 1.9)
Willacy County Rural No 173.8 (139.1, 214.5) 166 (29, 224) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.7)
Grayson County Urban No 226.7 (211.5, 242.7) 46 (18, 101) 181 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 3.8)
McLennan County Urban No 187.9 (177.3, 198.9) 131 (84, 168) 247 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.0)
Crane County Rural No 245.1 (154.9, 366.5) 23 (1, 226) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.4)
Real County Rural No 261.9 (175.2, 387.8) 8 (1, 222) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.6, 4.6)
Knox County Rural No 304.9 (206.4, 437.7) 3 (1, 210) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.0)
Starr County Rural No 176.5 (153.4, 201.9) 162 (56, 216) 44 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.2)
Dimmit County Rural No 276.1 (213.3, 352.3) 7 (1, 172) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.5)
Swisher County Rural No 193.7 (138.6, 264.3) 118 (5, 225) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.7)
Rains County Rural No 222.0 (180.7, 271.4) 59 (5, 201) 23 stable stable trend 1.5 (-9.7, 15.6)
Yoakum County Rural No 134.3 (82.2, 206.2) 223 (16, 227) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.6, 5.1)
Hansford County Rural No 249.5 (167.3, 357.4) 15 (1, 222) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.4, 4.9)
Zapata County Rural No 182.5 (138.8, 235.3) 148 (13, 224) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.5, 5.1)
Parker County Urban No 190.3 (176.8, 204.5) 128 (66, 176) 164 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.5, 6.3)
Ector County Urban No 225.1 (206.9, 244.3) 48 (15, 115) 129 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.3, 8.9)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 233.6 (203.3, 267.6) 33 (7, 147) 45 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.7, 12.1)
Cameron County Urban No 147.3 (139.7, 155.1) 211 (184, 219) 294 stable stable trend 6.1 (-0.9, 10.4)
Johnson County Urban No 207.3 (193.4, 222.0) 78 (39, 140) 186 rising rising trend 7.5 (4.6, 9.9)
Gray County Rural No 200.1 (166.0, 239.3) 104 (14, 210) 24 stable stable trend 11.5 (-1.9, 21.6)
Donley County Rural No 131.3 (77.3, 218.9) 224 (17, 227) 3 stable stable trend 16.2 (-11.5, 42.8)
Bailey County Rural No 138.5 (88.8, 206.1) 217 (23, 227) 5
*
*
Collingsworth County Rural No 223.5 (132.3, 358.9) 53 (1, 227) 3
*
*
Concho County Rural No 174.0 (111.4, 267.1) 165 (4, 227) 4
*
*
Edwards County Rural No 249.0 (144.8, 425.8) 16 (1, 226) 3
*
*
Hartley County Rural No 166.9 (107.4, 247.5) 180 (7, 227) 5
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban No 258.6 (148.0, 417.9) 9 (1, 227) 3
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural No 138.8 (69.8, 377.0) 216 (1, 227) 3
*
*
Ochiltree County Rural Yes 92.7 (56.6, 143.0) 226 (164, 227) 4
*
*
Presidio County Rural Yes 86.5 (53.7, 135.5) 227 (193, 227) 4
*
*
Reagan County Rural No 284.7 (154.4, 470.0) 5 (1, 227) 3
*
*
Armstrong County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 5:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top