Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington N/A No 168.5 (166.7, 170.3) N/A 6,987 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
United States N/A No 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) N/A 318,737 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Skamania County Urban No 155.4 (122.2, 196.8) 34 (4, 38) 16 stable stable trend -2.7 (-4.9, 0.0)
San Juan County Rural Yes 121.4 (97.5, 151.4) 38 (30, 38) 22 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.2)
Franklin County Urban No 157.8 (138.4, 178.9) 32 (9, 38) 55 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.1)
Jefferson County Rural No 144.2 (126.3, 165.2) 36 (20, 38) 57 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Grays Harbor County Rural No 191.5 (175.2, 209.2) 7 (2, 28) 111 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
King County Urban No 146.0 (142.7, 149.4) 35 (31, 38) 1,536 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.9)
Adams County Rural No 140.6 (106.8, 181.3) 37 (6, 38) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Clark County Urban No 174.4 (167.0, 182.0) 21 (10, 30) 462 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Kitsap County Urban No 166.3 (157.3, 175.7) 29 (14, 34) 277 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Klickitat County Rural No 176.7 (149.6, 208.2) 18 (2, 37) 34 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.2, 0.0)
Lincoln County Rural No 164.0 (127.6, 209.4) 30 (2, 38) 15 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Pend Oreille County Rural No 218.7 (179.5, 265.4) 3 (1, 30) 26 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Ferry County Rural No 189.0 (141.8, 250.8) 8 (1, 38) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.1, 1.1)
Island County Rural No 159.1 (145.6, 173.8) 31 (14, 37) 111 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Pierce County Urban No 181.7 (175.8, 187.6) 14 (7, 24) 799 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Benton County Urban No 170.7 (159.5, 182.5) 26 (10, 34) 185 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Spokane County Urban No 175.7 (168.9, 182.8) 20 (9, 29) 533 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Stevens County Urban No 183.1 (163.2, 205.1) 12 (3, 33) 69 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Asotin County Urban No 170.5 (144.2, 201.1) 27 (3, 37) 31 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Chelan County Urban No 156.6 (141.5, 173.0) 33 (14, 37) 83 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Douglas County Urban No 173.7 (151.2, 198.7) 23 (4, 36) 45 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Grant County Rural No 181.1 (164.4, 199.1) 15 (4, 32) 90 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Pacific County Rural No 180.3 (155.0, 209.8) 16 (2, 36) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Snohomish County Urban No 173.9 (167.7, 180.1) 22 (12, 30) 685 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Lewis County Rural No 195.8 (179.4, 213.4) 6 (2, 25) 114 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Walla Walla County Urban No 170.2 (152.2, 189.9) 28 (6, 36) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Whatcom County Urban No 176.4 (166.1, 187.2) 19 (7, 31) 235 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Yakima County Urban No 177.5 (166.9, 188.5) 17 (7, 31) 221 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Skagit County Urban No 182.8 (170.3, 196.1) 13 (4, 30) 168 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Mason County Rural No 188.7 (171.3, 207.5) 9 (3, 30) 97 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Columbia County Rural No 232.4 (169.2, 320.4) 1 (1, 36) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 2.0)
Clallam County Rural No 187.1 (172.5, 202.9) 10 (3, 28) 139 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Cowlitz County Urban No 223.2 (207.4, 239.8) 2 (1, 7) 161 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Whitman County Rural No 172.6 (146.1, 202.5) 24 (3, 37) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Okanogan County Rural No 207.9 (185.2, 233.0) 5 (1, 20) 67 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.6)
Thurston County Urban No 171.4 (162.3, 180.8) 25 (11, 33) 289 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.6)
Kittitas County Rural No 185.9 (162.9, 211.4) 11 (2, 34) 51 stable stable trend 1.5 (-9.6, 13.0)
Wahkiakum County Rural No 211.7 (155.1, 291.6) 4 (1, 37) 11
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 2:57 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top