Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A No 133.2 (131.5, 135.0) N/A 4,793 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Greene County Urban No 155.6 (111.8, 212.7) 7 (1, 67) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.2)
Perry County Rural No 143.9 (104.3, 195.4) 22 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.5, 0.6)
Coosa County Rural Yes 115.0 (84.5, 155.8) 64 (4, 67) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.5)
Wilcox County Rural No 131.1 (96.5, 175.3) 47 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.1)
Bullock County Rural No 143.7 (106.0, 192.3) 23 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.7)
Sumter County Rural No 124.0 (90.3, 166.8) 57 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.6)
Lowndes County Urban No 153.6 (116.4, 200.5) 10 (1, 67) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 0.8)
Conecuh County Rural No 141.7 (108.3, 183.6) 25 (1, 67) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Choctaw County Rural Yes 121.1 (94.4, 154.9) 60 (5, 67) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Clay County Rural No 127.3 (99.2, 162.2) 50 (3, 67) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Lamar County Rural No 135.1 (105.3, 172.0) 36 (1, 67) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.1)
Washington County Rural No 139.0 (109.9, 174.6) 29 (1, 67) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Marengo County Rural Yes 110.5 (87.8, 138.1) 66 (15, 67) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.0)
Hale County Urban No 151.6 (120.2, 189.6) 12 (1, 66) 17 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.5)
Crenshaw County Rural No 168.1 (133.8, 209.7) 2 (1, 62) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Cleburne County Rural No 161.4 (129.7, 199.4) 5 (1, 62) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Henry County Urban No 124.2 (99.4, 154.4) 56 (4, 67) 19 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Fayette County Rural No 148.8 (119.0, 184.8) 15 (1, 66) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Butler County Rural No 126.5 (101.4, 156.7) 51 (4, 67) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.5)
Macon County Urban No 126.0 (101.5, 155.7) 52 (4, 67) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.6)
Bibb County Urban No 139.1 (113.2, 169.8) 28 (1, 67) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Monroe County Rural No 132.4 (107.5, 162.1) 43 (3, 67) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Pickens County Urban No 150.8 (123.5, 183.3) 14 (1, 65) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Randolph County Rural No 132.0 (108.8, 159.5) 44 (3, 67) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Winston County Rural Yes 120.0 (99.0, 145.0) 62 (9, 67) 24 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.2)
Geneva County Urban No 125.8 (104.4, 150.7) 53 (7, 67) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Barbour County Rural No 145.4 (120.4, 174.6) 21 (1, 65) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.4)
Pike County Rural No 145.9 (122.9, 172.2) 19 (1, 64) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Cherokee County Rural No 168.1 (142.3, 197.8) 3 (1, 47) 33 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Clarke County Rural No 180.0 (152.7, 211.3) 1 (1, 30) 34 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.7)
Franklin County Rural No 158.1 (135.1, 184.2) 6 (1, 55) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Lawrence County Urban No 141.1 (120.4, 164.7) 27 (2, 64) 35 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
Marion County Rural No 141.6 (121.0, 165.2) 26 (2, 64) 35 stable stable trend -10.9 (-21.8, 0.2)
Dallas County Rural No 123.4 (105.3, 144.0) 59 (13, 67) 36 falling falling trend -4.8 (-17.6, -1.9)
Chambers County Rural No 134.3 (114.8, 156.5) 38 (4, 66) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Chilton County Urban No 135.4 (117.2, 155.8) 34 (4, 65) 41 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Escambia County Rural No 154.8 (133.9, 178.4) 8 (1, 56) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Dale County Rural No 133.6 (116.8, 152.5) 40 (7, 65) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Tallapoosa County Rural No 145.6 (126.7, 166.9) 20 (2, 61) 48 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Coffee County Rural No 131.5 (115.2, 149.5) 45 (10, 65) 49 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Covington County Rural No 153.3 (134.1, 174.9) 11 (1, 55) 50 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Autauga County Urban No 133.4 (117.8, 150.7) 41 (9, 65) 54 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Blount County Urban No 138.2 (122.7, 155.3) 30 (5, 62) 60 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Colbert County Urban No 130.2 (115.5, 146.4) 48 (12, 65) 60 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Russell County Urban No 162.9 (145.0, 182.6) 4 (1, 37) 62 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Jackson County Rural No 154.5 (137.5, 173.2) 9 (1, 47) 65 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
DeKalb County Rural No 136.2 (121.8, 152.0) 32 (7, 63) 68 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Walker County Urban No 148.6 (133.5, 165.2) 16 (2, 51) 75 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Elmore County Urban No 134.1 (121.1, 148.3) 39 (10, 62) 80 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.1)
Cullman County Rural No 123.9 (112.0, 136.9) 58 (22, 66) 83 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
St. Clair County Urban No 124.3 (112.4, 137.2) 55 (22, 66) 83 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -1.8)
Limestone County Urban Yes 120.3 (108.9, 132.7) 61 (28, 66) 84 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Talladega County Rural No 148.0 (134.2, 162.9) 17 (3, 50) 89 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Marshall County Rural No 136.8 (124.3, 150.2) 31 (9, 60) 92 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Lauderdale County Urban No 124.4 (112.8, 136.9) 54 (22, 66) 93 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Houston County Urban No 132.7 (121.3, 145.0) 42 (14, 62) 105 stable stable trend 5.5 (-0.6, 10.8)
Morgan County Urban No 131.2 (120.5, 142.6) 46 (16, 63) 116 falling falling trend -7.6 (-14.1, -1.0)
Etowah County Urban No 151.3 (139.1, 164.3) 13 (3, 41) 121 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.8, 4.9)
Calhoun County Urban No 147.9 (136.2, 160.5) 18 (4, 46) 125 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Lee County Urban No 135.6 (125.1, 146.8) 33 (12, 58) 128 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Tuscaloosa County Urban Yes 114.1 (106.1, 122.7) 65 (46, 67) 153 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Shelby County Urban Yes 102.1 (95.0, 109.8) 67 (60, 67) 155 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Montgomery County Urban No 135.0 (126.7, 143.7) 37 (15, 56) 207 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Baldwin County Urban Yes 118.9 (111.8, 126.4) 63 (41, 65) 225 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Madison County Urban No 127.9 (121.7, 134.4) 49 (29, 60) 330 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Mobile County Urban No 142.5 (136.2, 149.0) 24 (11, 42) 409 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Jefferson County Urban No 135.1 (130.4, 140.1) 35 (22, 50) 636 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 4:28 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top