Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A No 131.5 (130.4, 132.6) N/A 11,485 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Brown County Rural Yes 122.6 (76.1, 191.6) 88 (2, 102) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.7, 1.4)
Pope County Rural No 132.6 (76.7, 225.5) 77 (1, 102) 4
*
*
Edwards County Rural Yes 91.5 (58.7, 140.5) 102 (22, 102) 5 falling falling trend -16.0 (-39.1, -3.9)
Calhoun County Urban No 133.7 (84.5, 207.8) 72 (1, 102) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.4, -0.8)
Schuyler County Rural Yes 97.4 (63.5, 147.4) 101 (17, 102) 5 falling falling trend -8.1 (-29.2, -2.5)
Scott County Rural No 145.3 (95.1, 217.2) 52 (1, 102) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 0.8)
Hardin County Rural No 205.0 (133.1, 308.6) 3 (1, 101) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.0)
Pulaski County Rural No 152.3 (104.1, 220.6) 33 (1, 102) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.0)
Putnam County Rural No 141.6 (96.9, 204.9) 62 (1, 102) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 1.4)
Stark County Urban No 163.0 (110.4, 235.6) 16 (1, 102) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.0)
Gallatin County Rural No 176.8 (121.4, 253.9) 8 (1, 102) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
Jasper County Rural Yes 121.5 (88.7, 165.0) 91 (6, 102) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.1)
Cumberland County Rural Yes 113.7 (83.1, 153.8) 99 (16, 102) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.4)
Henderson County Rural No 145.6 (104.2, 203.2) 50 (1, 102) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.4)
Hamilton County Rural No 146.5 (106.3, 199.1) 49 (1, 102) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.3)
Alexander County Urban No 222.9 (161.0, 305.3) 1 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 3.5)
Johnson County Rural Yes 99.1 (73.5, 133.4) 100 (47, 102) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.7, -0.1)
Washington County Rural Yes 118.9 (90.5, 154.7) 93 (13, 102) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.4)
Cass County Rural No 148.5 (114.0, 191.0) 41 (1, 101) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Marshall County Urban No 132.8 (100.6, 173.6) 75 (4, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Wabash County Rural No 144.6 (110.0, 188.2) 56 (2, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.3)
Menard County Urban No 151.5 (117.3, 193.8) 36 (1, 100) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Lawrence County Rural No 135.0 (104.7, 172.7) 68 (5, 102) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.5)
Moultrie County Rural No 146.9 (114.7, 186.0) 48 (2, 100) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Ford County Urban No 135.3 (106.2, 171.5) 66 (6, 102) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
White County Rural No 127.5 (98.5, 163.8) 81 (7, 102) 15 falling falling trend -3.9 (-17.1, -1.6)
Clay County Rural No 164.1 (129.9, 205.8) 14 (1, 97) 17 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.2)
Bond County Urban No 151.2 (119.6, 189.5) 37 (2, 99) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.1)
Mason County Rural No 151.0 (121.0, 188.2) 38 (2, 99) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Piatt County Urban No 134.5 (107.3, 167.6) 69 (6, 101) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Clark County Rural No 154.7 (124.0, 191.7) 24 (2, 98) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Mercer County Urban No 148.1 (118.7, 183.9) 45 (3, 100) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1)
Pike County Rural No 147.0 (117.5, 183.0) 47 (3, 99) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Warren County Rural No 152.0 (121.6, 188.5) 35 (2, 99) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.6)
Greene County Rural No 205.2 (165.4, 253.2) 2 (1, 57) 19 stable stable trend 13.8 (-0.2, 25.3)
Hancock County Rural Yes 114.1 (92.3, 141.1) 98 (36, 102) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Massac County Urban No 163.7 (131.1, 203.2) 15 (1, 95) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Richland County Rural No 148.2 (119.4, 182.8) 43 (3, 99) 20 stable stable trend -1.4 (-13.6, 0.8)
Wayne County Rural No 153.7 (124.2, 189.1) 30 (2, 98) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Fayette County Rural No 132.8 (108.3, 162.1) 76 (10, 101) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Union County Rural No 154.2 (125.2, 189.0) 27 (2, 98) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Douglas County Rural No 153.6 (124.5, 187.8) 31 (2, 98) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Crawford County Rural No 144.7 (118.1, 176.5) 55 (5, 99) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Carroll County Rural No 179.3 (145.1, 220.5) 6 (1, 83) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
De Witt County Rural No 182.6 (150.1, 221.3) 5 (1, 74) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.5)
Shelby County Rural Yes 115.7 (95.3, 140.5) 96 (33, 102) 23 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Edgar County Rural No 157.9 (128.4, 193.2) 22 (2, 98) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.0)
Perry County Rural No 152.2 (124.7, 185.0) 34 (3, 98) 23 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.4)
McDonough County Rural No 135.2 (111.9, 162.5) 67 (10, 101) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Jo Daviess County Rural No 124.0 (102.2, 150.5) 84 (20, 102) 27 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.2)
Jersey County Urban No 169.3 (142.0, 201.1) 10 (1, 77) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Clinton County Urban Yes 117.5 (99.1, 138.6) 94 (39, 102) 30 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Monroe County Urban Yes 121.7 (102.9, 143.3) 90 (30, 102) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Effingham County Rural No 130.7 (111.2, 153.0) 79 (16, 100) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Saline County Rural No 168.4 (143.4, 197.3) 11 (2, 81) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Montgomery County Rural No 148.3 (125.5, 174.6) 42 (4, 95) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Logan County Rural No 155.1 (132.0, 181.7) 23 (4, 90) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Woodford County Urban No 127.7 (109.2, 148.7) 80 (21, 101) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Iroquois County Rural No 166.4 (142.7, 193.5) 12 (2, 76) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Morgan County Rural No 145.5 (124.9, 169.0) 51 (7, 94) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Randolph County Rural No 160.0 (137.2, 186.2) 20 (3, 82) 39 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 8.0)
Christian County Rural No 153.9 (132.4, 178.4) 28 (4, 89) 40 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Bureau County Rural No 137.3 (118.0, 159.4) 63 (12, 98) 40 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Livingston County Rural No 153.8 (133.1, 177.3) 29 (4, 86) 42 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Boone County Urban No 123.5 (107.4, 141.5) 85 (36, 101) 43 falling falling trend -4.8 (-13.1, -1.7)
Lee County Rural No 165.5 (143.3, 190.7) 13 (2, 73) 44 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Jefferson County Rural No 162.3 (140.8, 186.5) 18 (2, 78) 44 rising rising trend 11.8 (0.1, 19.5)
Fulton County Rural No 174.9 (151.9, 200.9) 9 (1, 61) 46 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Macoupin County Urban No 125.0 (108.9, 143.2) 83 (29, 101) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Coles County Rural No 134.4 (117.2, 153.8) 70 (18, 99) 47 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Franklin County Rural No 161.7 (140.8, 185.1) 19 (3, 78) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Jackson County Rural No 141.7 (123.5, 161.9) 61 (11, 95) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Stephenson County Rural No 133.8 (116.5, 153.3) 71 (19, 99) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Grundy County Urban No 162.4 (143.1, 183.6) 17 (3, 72) 52 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Marion County Rural No 184.8 (162.5, 209.8) 4 (1, 41) 53 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Henry County Urban No 143.4 (126.7, 162.0) 57 (12, 92) 57 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Ogle County Rural No 149.7 (132.8, 168.4) 40 (8, 84) 60 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Knox County Rural No 158.3 (140.3, 178.2) 21 (4, 76) 64 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.0, 9.4)
Williamson County Rural No 133.7 (119.6, 149.2) 73 (28, 97) 69 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.6, 6.4)
Whiteside County Rural No 152.7 (136.6, 170.5) 32 (8, 80) 70 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Kendall County Urban Yes 119.6 (107.7, 132.4) 92 (58, 101) 76 stable stable trend -1.4 (-9.0, 4.6)
Adams County Rural No 147.2 (132.1, 163.7) 46 (13, 84) 76 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
DeKalb County Urban No 154.4 (140.0, 169.9) 26 (8, 72) 87 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Vermilion County Rural No 177.8 (162.1, 194.9) 7 (2, 38) 101 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Kankakee County Urban No 149.9 (137.4, 163.3) 39 (12, 75) 110 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Macon County Urban No 143.2 (131.6, 155.6) 58 (19, 82) 123 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.9, -0.6)
McLean County Urban No 123.1 (113.4, 133.5) 86 (57, 98) 123 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Champaign County Urban Yes 116.7 (107.7, 126.2) 95 (69, 100) 132 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
La Salle County Rural No 154.5 (142.5, 167.3) 25 (10, 67) 132 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Tazewell County Urban No 144.8 (134.2, 156.1) 54 (20, 79) 147 stable stable trend 5.8 (-1.6, 10.9)
Rock Island County Urban No 133.2 (123.5, 143.5) 74 (39, 91) 151 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Peoria County Urban No 145.1 (135.6, 155.1) 53 (21, 77) 185 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Sangamon County Urban No 136.2 (127.8, 145.1) 65 (38, 86) 207 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
St. Clair County Urban No 148.1 (140.1, 156.6) 44 (21, 67) 264 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
McHenry County Urban No 136.5 (129.3, 144.1) 64 (40, 82) 275 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Madison County Urban No 142.7 (135.1, 150.6) 59 (29, 76) 280 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Winnebago County Urban No 141.8 (134.5, 149.5) 60 (29, 77) 294 falling falling trend -2.8 (-6.6, -1.3)
Kane County Urban No 122.8 (117.4, 128.5) 87 (68, 96) 390 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Will County Urban No 131.7 (126.7, 136.8) 78 (55, 86) 544 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Lake County Urban Yes 121.9 (117.3, 126.7) 89 (70, 96) 547 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
DuPage County Urban Yes 114.7 (110.9, 118.5) 97 (82, 100) 740 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Cook County Urban No 126.6 (124.8, 128.3) 82 (68, 87) 4,376 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -2.0)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 3:26 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top