Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas N/A No 132.9 (130.6, 135.3) N/A 2,600 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.7)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Butler County Urban No 128.5 (113.6, 145.1) 66 (29, 83) 55 falling falling trend -6.5 (-12.6, -3.4)
Saline County Rural No 130.8 (115.0, 148.5) 62 (29, 82) 53 falling falling trend -5.0 (-14.8, -0.1)
Decatur County Rural No 129.8 (76.2, 224.0) 65 (3, 91) 4 stable stable trend -4.7 (-37.4, 2.7)
Barber County Rural Yes 95.4 (55.8, 160.3) 90 (15, 91) 3 falling falling trend -4.1 (-8.4, -0.8)
Jackson County Urban Yes 107.2 (80.2, 141.8) 85 (26, 91) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -1.1)
Coffey County Rural Yes 107.3 (73.4, 153.9) 84 (15, 91) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.8, 0.0)
Osborne County Rural Yes 104.5 (61.0, 178.6) 87 (8, 91) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.6, 0.0)
Gray County Rural Yes 111.7 (67.4, 175.8) 81 (7, 91) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.7, 0.9)
Woodson County Rural Yes 116.5 (69.3, 198.9) 78 (4, 91) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.2, 1.5)
Harvey County Urban No 123.1 (104.2, 144.9) 73 (29, 88) 34 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -1.0)
Douglas County Urban Yes 109.2 (97.9, 121.6) 82 (59, 89) 70 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Pawnee County Rural Yes 102.2 (64.3, 159.6) 89 (12, 91) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.6, 0.5)
Ottawa County Rural No 160.0 (109.4, 229.4) 25 (2, 90) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.5)
Rice County Rural No 138.6 (99.2, 189.8) 54 (5, 91) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.4)
Johnson County Urban Yes 112.4 (107.6, 117.3) 80 (66, 86) 437 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Rawlins County Rural No 142.9 (84.9, 242.8) 46 (2, 91) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.6)
Scott County Rural Yes 83.2 (47.9, 139.3) 91 (30, 91) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 1.5)
Wyandotte County Urban No 151.4 (140.1, 163.3) 35 (16, 59) 139 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
McPherson County Rural Yes 120.9 (100.7, 144.3) 74 (28, 89) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Ford County Rural No 127.8 (104.6, 154.5) 68 (21, 88) 22 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Montgomery County Rural No 141.1 (120.3, 164.9) 48 (15, 81) 35 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.3)
Morton County Rural No 172.8 (98.6, 288.9) 14 (2, 91) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.7, 1.9)
Sedgwick County Urban No 135.9 (130.2, 141.8) 57 (36, 68) 445 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Wabaunsee County Urban No 144.8 (99.0, 206.6) 44 (3, 91) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Mitchell County Rural No 137.6 (92.2, 201.1) 55 (4, 91) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.4)
Cherokee County Urban No 140.2 (113.3, 172.3) 50 (9, 86) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.4)
Osage County Urban No 151.4 (120.6, 188.7) 34 (5, 84) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Shawnee County Urban No 135.6 (126.5, 145.2) 58 (31, 72) 181 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Allen County Rural No 148.0 (114.2, 189.9) 40 (5, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 1.7)
Atchison County Rural No 140.2 (109.5, 177.6) 49 (8, 89) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Chautauqua County Rural No 171.1 (104.5, 271.9) 16 (2, 91) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.6, 3.4)
Geary County Urban No 151.5 (122.3, 185.3) 32 (7, 83) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Seward County Rural No 128.1 (98.2, 164.1) 67 (12, 91) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.2)
Stevens County Rural No 125.1 (72.9, 200.5) 71 (4, 91) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.0, 3.4)
Leavenworth County Urban No 139.7 (125.3, 155.4) 52 (21, 75) 71 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Harper County Rural No 130.3 (85.8, 194.3) 63 (6, 91) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.6, 3.0)
Pottawatomie County Urban No 126.3 (101.9, 154.9) 69 (18, 89) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Sumner County Urban No 155.6 (129.8, 185.7) 28 (7, 76) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Greenwood County Rural No 189.2 (133.7, 263.5) 8 (2, 83) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.4)
Bourbon County Rural No 125.7 (95.4, 163.4) 70 (12, 91) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Cowley County Rural No 167.2 (144.0, 193.4) 17 (6, 61) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Jewell County Rural Yes 107.6 (63.2, 192.0) 83 (8, 91) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.7, 3.8)
Reno County Rural No 135.4 (120.6, 151.9) 59 (23, 79) 66 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Finney County Rural No 134.2 (111.0, 160.9) 60 (15, 86) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Labette County Rural No 151.5 (124.7, 183.1) 33 (6, 79) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.4)
Rooks County Rural No 137.2 (88.6, 207.4) 56 (3, 91) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Washington County Rural Yes 106.2 (71.0, 159.2) 86 (15, 91) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.5)
Crawford County Rural No 162.8 (141.1, 187.2) 22 (6, 64) 42 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Ellis County Rural Yes 120.0 (97.2, 146.7) 75 (23, 89) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3)
Franklin County Rural No 160.1 (133.6, 190.5) 24 (6, 73) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Lyon County Rural No 141.8 (118.1, 168.9) 47 (12, 83) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Jefferson County Urban No 149.2 (121.3, 182.5) 38 (7, 83) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Rush County Rural No 220.3 (139.0, 341.2) 4 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.0, 3.9)
Wilson County Rural No 144.5 (106.3, 194.3) 45 (5, 90) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Barton County Rural No 132.2 (108.7, 159.7) 61 (17, 87) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Riley County Urban No 139.2 (120.2, 160.3) 53 (16, 82) 40 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Thomas County Rural No 139.9 (99.2, 193.7) 51 (5, 91) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.9)
Cloud County Rural Yes 120.0 (83.9, 167.9) 76 (10, 91) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.3)
Gove County Rural Yes 117.2 (65.0, 207.7) 77 (4, 91) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.6, 5.8)
Miami County Urban No 130.2 (109.9, 153.4) 64 (21, 87) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 8.3)
Dickinson County Rural No 174.2 (144.0, 209.9) 13 (3, 65) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.6)
Neosho County Rural No 154.7 (123.3, 192.6) 29 (5, 82) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.0)
Phillips County Rural No 159.9 (103.1, 239.8) 26 (2, 91) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 2.9)
Sherman County Rural Yes 113.9 (71.6, 174.5) 79 (9, 91) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.3, 3.9)
Chase County Rural No 192.3 (119.6, 306.1) 6 (1, 90) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.1)
Marshall County Rural No 157.7 (120.7, 204.5) 27 (4, 85) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.1)
Pratt County Rural No 123.6 (90.9, 166.7) 72 (13, 91) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Clay County Rural No 145.7 (107.4, 196.0) 43 (4, 89) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.5)
Linn County Urban No 150.8 (111.6, 200.9) 36 (5, 88) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Kearny County Rural No 164.4 (98.1, 260.2) 19 (2, 91) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.3, 6.4)
Doniphan County Urban No 150.1 (105.2, 209.5) 37 (4, 90) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.6)
Marion County Rural No 147.4 (115.1, 187.9) 41 (6, 86) 15 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.9)
Morris County Rural No 191.0 (132.4, 270.2) 7 (1, 84) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.6, 3.5)
Stafford County Rural No 163.6 (98.7, 257.8) 21 (2, 91) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.5, 4.4)
Ellsworth County Rural No 152.6 (100.8, 225.3) 30 (2, 91) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.2, 4.4)
Brown County Rural No 184.4 (140.4, 239.4) 10 (2, 79) 13 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 2.8)
Kingman County Rural No 347.7 (278.6, 431.0) 1 (1, 4) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-19.9, 14.5)
Anderson County Rural No 176.2 (130.4, 235.0) 12 (2, 83) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.1)
Russell County Rural No 152.5 (104.9, 216.5) 31 (2, 89) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.1, 3.9)
Elk County Rural No 171.5 (102.2, 287.7) 15 (1, 91) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.9, 13.7)
Meade County Rural No 215.0 (145.2, 310.9) 5 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 5.0)
Trego County Rural No 189.2 (123.1, 292.8) 9 (1, 89) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 4.6)
Nemaha County Rural No 146.0 (110.0, 191.7) 42 (5, 88) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-4.6, 12.9)
Edwards County Rural No 228.7 (135.8, 364.7) 2 (1, 88) 4 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.3, 6.8)
Haskell County Rural No 162.1 (92.1, 264.8) 23 (2, 91) 3 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.6, 7.0)
Republic County Rural No 179.4 (120.8, 261.3) 11 (2, 89) 8 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.6, 22.5)
Cheyenne County Rural No 220.3 (128.5, 357.9) 3 (1, 89) 4
*
*
Grant County Rural No 165.5 (114.3, 232.8) 18 (2, 89) 7
*
*
Logan County Rural No 164.0 (87.3, 285.2) 20 (1, 91) 3
*
*
Norton County Rural Yes 103.2 (62.8, 166.1) 88 (11, 91) 4
*
*
Smith County Rural No 148.3 (89.8, 238.6) 39 (2, 91) 5
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hodgeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ness County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wichita County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 1:34 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top