Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi N/A No 149.5 (147.1, 152.0) N/A 3,035 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Franklin County Rural No 140.1 (100.2, 192.9) 60 (4, 81) 8 falling falling trend -19.3 (-32.2, -2.2)
Madison County Urban No 152.3 (139.5, 166.1) 42 (18, 67) 108 falling falling trend -12.4 (-20.7, -3.9)
Calhoun County Rural No 153.3 (119.2, 195.2) 39 (4, 81) 15 stable stable trend -3.5 (-22.6, 0.5)
Lee County Rural No 162.4 (147.5, 178.5) 26 (11, 60) 90 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -1.1)
Alcorn County Rural No 126.2 (107.0, 148.2) 76 (31, 81) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Carroll County Rural No 133.8 (98.5, 180.2) 69 (8, 81) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
Jefferson County Rural No 156.9 (111.3, 217.1) 34 (2, 81) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.0)
Stone County Urban No 147.3 (116.6, 184.2) 50 (6, 81) 17 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.5)
Yalobusha County Rural No 167.8 (132.8, 210.6) 23 (3, 79) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-4.8, -0.2)
Perry County Urban No 171.4 (134.5, 216.7) 20 (2, 78) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.1)
Bolivar County Rural No 172.9 (148.6, 200.3) 19 (4, 64) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Lamar County Urban Yes 121.9 (106.9, 138.6) 78 (47, 81) 48 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Smith County Rural No 139.4 (110.4, 174.9) 61 (10, 81) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.8)
Harrison County Urban No 151.2 (141.9, 161.0) 45 (23, 64) 207 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Jones County Rural No 129.3 (114.8, 145.3) 74 (36, 81) 61 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.1)
Kemper County Rural No 136.7 (96.1, 190.1) 65 (5, 81) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.1)
Amite County Rural No 138.8 (109.4, 175.6) 63 (10, 81) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Leake County Rural No 149.8 (122.6, 181.8) 47 (8, 80) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Newton County Rural Yes 122.5 (97.8, 151.9) 77 (25, 81) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.4)
Scott County Urban No 131.6 (108.6, 158.3) 72 (19, 81) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Wilkinson County Rural No 175.4 (130.1, 233.7) 15 (1, 80) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.2)
DeSoto County Urban No 157.8 (147.1, 169.0) 31 (17, 58) 168 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Oktibbeha County Rural No 133.2 (113.5, 155.5) 70 (23, 81) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Pearl River County Rural No 166.6 (148.8, 186.1) 24 (8, 64) 68 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Warren County Rural No 150.8 (131.3, 172.5) 46 (12, 75) 46 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Chickasaw County Rural No 142.5 (113.7, 177.2) 55 (9, 81) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.2)
Clarke County Rural Yes 114.9 (90.1, 145.6) 79 (33, 81) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Humphreys County Rural No 204.3 (154.7, 266.7) 5 (1, 75) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.1)
Lafayette County Rural No 132.4 (114.6, 152.2) 71 (26, 80) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.7)
Pike County Rural No 149.6 (129.3, 172.3) 48 (14, 77) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 0.9)
Rankin County Urban Yes 109.2 (100.5, 118.5) 80 (71, 81) 119 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.4)
Jackson County Urban No 146.3 (135.5, 157.9) 51 (26, 70) 140 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Jasper County Rural No 161.1 (128.6, 200.0) 27 (3, 79) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.3)
Lawrence County Rural No 155.7 (119.0, 201.3) 35 (4, 81) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Forrest County Urban No 148.2 (132.6, 165.3) 49 (17, 75) 68 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Itawamba County Rural No 145.5 (120.3, 174.8) 52 (11, 80) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Marion County Rural No 136.9 (113.1, 164.7) 64 (16, 81) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Tate County Urban No 155.5 (130.5, 184.2) 36 (7, 78) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Panola County Rural No 174.3 (150.6, 201.0) 16 (4, 60) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Washington County Rural No 200.9 (178.9, 225.2) 7 (2, 29) 64 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Benton County Urban No 157.3 (112.4, 216.1) 33 (2, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.1)
Claiborne County Rural No 134.7 (97.0, 183.9) 68 (6, 81) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.5)
Grenada County Rural No 188.0 (158.4, 222.0) 10 (2, 54) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Hancock County Urban No 153.1 (134.9, 173.5) 40 (12, 72) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Webster County Rural No 168.2 (127.5, 219.0) 22 (2, 80) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 1.9)
Coahoma County Rural No 214.4 (181.2, 252.4) 4 (1, 32) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 130.3 (98.4, 171.7) 73 (10, 81) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Prentiss County Rural No 142.0 (118.0, 169.8) 56 (13, 81) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Tippah County Rural No 140.1 (114.1, 170.8) 59 (12, 81) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
George County Rural No 179.1 (146.7, 216.5) 14 (2, 69) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Marshall County Urban No 173.9 (150.6, 200.1) 17 (4, 63) 43 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Sunflower County Rural No 182.7 (152.9, 217.1) 12 (3, 63) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Clay County Rural No 140.9 (113.9, 173.0) 58 (9, 81) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Greene County Rural No 141.0 (105.9, 185.2) 57 (6, 81) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Hinds County Urban No 136.1 (127.7, 145.1) 67 (42, 75) 203 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Lincoln County Rural No 153.9 (132.4, 178.2) 38 (10, 75) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Wayne County Rural No 154.3 (125.9, 187.6) 37 (6, 79) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Holmes County Urban No 200.7 (164.1, 243.4) 8 (1, 57) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Simpson County Urban No 136.5 (113.9, 162.8) 66 (18, 81) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Union County Rural No 159.2 (134.4, 187.5) 30 (7, 73) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.6)
Winston County Rural No 164.1 (133.7, 200.1) 25 (4, 76) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.8)
Jefferson Davis County Rural No 144.9 (109.9, 188.8) 53 (5, 81) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Adams County Rural No 173.4 (149.1, 201.1) 18 (4, 62) 42 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Choctaw County Rural Yes 104.6 (74.3, 146.4) 81 (29, 81) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 3.0)
Copiah County Urban No 151.6 (127.7, 179.0) 44 (9, 78) 30 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6)
Lauderdale County Rural No 128.5 (115.0, 143.4) 75 (41, 80) 69 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.4, 3.6)
Leflore County Rural No 202.3 (173.1, 235.2) 6 (1, 36) 36 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Lowndes County Rural No 157.7 (140.6, 176.4) 32 (12, 68) 65 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Noxubee County Rural No 139.2 (100.2, 188.8) 62 (4, 81) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.6)
Tallahatchie County Rural No 159.4 (123.0, 204.4) 29 (3, 81) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Walthall County Rural No 144.3 (112.3, 183.5) 54 (7, 81) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.4)
Attala County Rural No 152.2 (124.0, 185.7) 43 (7, 80) 21 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.2)
Yazoo County Urban No 183.1 (153.6, 217.1) 11 (2, 63) 28 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.2)
Tunica County Urban No 264.1 (200.3, 341.4) 1 (1, 31) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.5)
Covington County Rural No 170.9 (138.7, 208.8) 21 (3, 76) 20 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.0)
Neshoba County Rural No 160.4 (135.4, 188.9) 28 (6, 75) 30 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.6)
Tishomingo County Rural No 192.7 (161.9, 228.5) 9 (1, 54) 29 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.3)
Pontotoc County Rural No 181.7 (155.5, 211.3) 13 (3, 56) 35 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.6)
Quitman County Rural No 261.7 (195.5, 345.0) 2 (1, 37) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 12.8)
Monroe County Rural No 152.9 (132.3, 176.1) 41 (11, 75) 42 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.1, 12.3)
Sharkey County Rural No 236.8 (155.5, 348.6) 3 (1, 78) 6 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.1, 5.3)
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 7:18 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top