Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York N/A Yes 112.1 (111.3, 112.9) N/A 16,367 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.0, -2.3)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Tompkins County Urban Yes 104.3 (93.1, 116.6) 56 (44, 62) 67 falling falling trend -5.2 (-13.4, -2.2)
Bronx County Urban Yes 101.4 (98.4, 104.4) 58 (54, 60) 930 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.9, -3.0)
New York County Urban Yes 91.1 (88.7, 93.6) 61 (60, 62) 1,142 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.2, -3.3)
Queens County Urban Yes 90.4 (88.4, 92.5) 62 (60, 62) 1,537 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.7, -2.6)
Kings County Urban Yes 97.0 (94.9, 99.2) 60 (57, 60) 1,690 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.9, -2.8)
Westchester County Urban Yes 99.1 (95.9, 102.4) 59 (55, 60) 773 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -2.3)
Putnam County Urban Yes 117.0 (106.0, 129.0) 53 (22, 58) 86 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Erie County Urban No 133.6 (129.8, 137.5) 27 (17, 39) 992 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -1.6)
Rockland County Urban Yes 103.9 (97.9, 110.1) 57 (51, 60) 237 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Suffolk County Urban Yes 117.5 (114.6, 120.4) 52 (42, 54) 1,330 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.9)
Ulster County Urban No 123.1 (115.0, 131.8) 46 (22, 55) 182 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Livingston County Urban Yes 114.5 (100.5, 130.2) 54 (20, 60) 53 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Madison County Urban Yes 118.7 (105.2, 133.7) 51 (18, 60) 60 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Nassau County Urban Yes 109.1 (106.3, 112.0) 55 (51, 57) 1,186 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Greene County Rural No 141.3 (125.1, 159.5) 14 (2, 52) 59 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Orange County Urban No 130.2 (123.8, 136.9) 36 (16, 48) 319 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Seneca County Rural No 129.2 (108.7, 152.9) 40 (2, 60) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Cortland County Rural No 130.5 (112.8, 150.5) 34 (4, 57) 41 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Dutchess County Urban No 124.9 (118.3, 131.9) 44 (23, 53) 284 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Richmond County Urban Yes 120.8 (115.6, 126.2) 47 (33, 54) 421 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Saratoga County Urban Yes 119.9 (112.7, 127.4) 49 (29, 55) 219 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Columbia County Rural No 130.4 (116.6, 145.7) 35 (7, 54) 73 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Onondaga County Urban No 125.1 (119.7, 130.6) 43 (26, 52) 446 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Ontario County Urban No 123.6 (113.4, 134.7) 45 (16, 55) 116 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Rensselaer County Urban No 131.9 (122.5, 141.9) 32 (10, 51) 154 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Albany County Urban Yes 120.1 (113.7, 126.8) 48 (31, 55) 283 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Hamilton County Rural No 134.3 (91.5, 200.9) 25 (1, 62) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.1)
Herkimer County Urban Yes 118.9 (105.3, 134.0) 50 (17, 59) 59 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Schoharie County Urban No 133.1 (112.8, 156.7) 28 (2, 58) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Warren County Urban No 134.9 (121.4, 149.8) 23 (5, 52) 79 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Monroe County Urban No 125.6 (121.4, 129.9) 42 (27, 50) 716 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
St. Lawrence County Rural No 140.0 (128.2, 152.8) 18 (4, 46) 110 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Sullivan County Rural No 140.7 (126.6, 156.1) 16 (2, 50) 77 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Lewis County Rural No 133.8 (110.7, 160.7) 26 (1, 59) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Wyoming County Rural No 129.7 (111.1, 151.1) 38 (3, 58) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Allegany County Rural No 134.6 (117.1, 154.3) 24 (3, 56) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Cattaraugus County Rural No 132.4 (119.0, 147.0) 30 (6, 54) 77 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 147.8 (134.9, 161.6) 10 (1, 38) 102 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Oswego County Urban No 142.8 (130.9, 155.6) 12 (3, 42) 113 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Broome County Urban No 130.2 (122.0, 138.9) 37 (14, 51) 209 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Cayuga County Rural No 131.2 (118.2, 145.6) 33 (6, 54) 79 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Chemung County Urban No 161.2 (147.1, 176.4) 3 (1, 21) 105 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Delaware County Rural No 135.9 (119.4, 154.5) 20 (3, 54) 56 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Essex County Rural No 135.5 (117.9, 155.6) 21 (3, 55) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Oneida County Urban No 132.2 (124.5, 140.3) 31 (12, 48) 240 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Tioga County Urban No 129.2 (113.3, 147.2) 39 (6, 56) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Niagara County Urban No 144.0 (135.7, 152.8) 11 (4, 32) 241 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Otsego County Rural No 126.3 (111.3, 143.0) 41 (8, 57) 59 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
Schenectady County Urban No 132.7 (123.1, 142.8) 29 (10, 50) 155 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Steuben County Rural No 149.2 (136.5, 162.8) 9 (1, 34) 109 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Chenango County Rural No 138.4 (121.7, 157.2) 19 (2, 53) 53 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Genesee County Rural No 135.3 (120.4, 151.9) 22 (4, 54) 63 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Wayne County Urban No 140.7 (128.1, 154.3) 17 (3, 46) 99 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Yates County Rural No 152.6 (127.9, 181.2) 7 (1, 53) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Chautauqua County Rural No 142.3 (131.7, 153.5) 13 (4, 39) 146 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Clinton County Rural No 154.1 (139.6, 169.9) 6 (1, 30) 88 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Fulton County Rural No 161.5 (144.0, 180.8) 2 (1, 27) 67 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Washington County Urban No 161.1 (144.8, 179.0) 4 (1, 24) 78 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Franklin County Rural No 152.2 (133.3, 173.4) 8 (1, 44) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Montgomery County Rural No 141.2 (124.2, 160.0) 15 (1, 53) 53 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Orleans County Urban No 160.2 (139.8, 183.2) 5 (1, 34) 47 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Schuyler County Rural No 170.0 (139.8, 205.8) 1 (1, 44) 25 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 2:52 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top